| Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
Text |
 |
| Fixed | e744s |
Tue Apr 16 17:51:33 2019 |
Fairouz & Marlène | RUN | General | Carbon | Log and scalers RUN 134 @ 17h52 | |
20x |
| Fixed | e793s |
Thu Mar 11 21:14:26 2021 |
Fairouz & Franco | OFFLINE | General | CD2 | Plots run 51-56 | Top left: kinematic plot with the main levels
observed. The orange lines are (d,p), (d,t),
(d,d) and (12C,12C) reactions by 47Ti. The |
|
| Fixed | com2019 |
Fri Apr 5 23:32:29 2019 |
Fairouz | CATS | General | CD2 | Electronic changes | CATS detectors were removed.
For the MUVI stop, we send now HF propre.
|
|
| Fixed | e793s |
Mon Mar 15 11:45:42 2021 |
Emmanuel, Chloé | OFFLINE | General | CD2 | 48K level scheme from gg analysis | |
|
| Ongoing | e793s |
Fri Mar 12 12:58:10 2021 |
Emmanuel C | OFFLINE | General | | Gamma Gamma Analysis | |
7x |
| Fixed | e793s |
Sat Mar 13 18:37:01 2021 |
Emmanuel C | OFFLINE | General | | Efficiency gamma AGATA | TF1 *fit_1 = new TF1("fit_1","TMath::Exp([0]+[1]*TMath::Log(x)+[2]*pow(TMath::Log(x),2.0)+[3]*pow(TMath::Log(x),3.0)+[4]*pow(TMath::Log(x),4.0))",100,5000);
//NRJ traite en keV et efficiency en %
p0 -7.84071e+00
|
|
| Ongoing | e793s |
Wed Mar 17 15:17:39 2021 |
Emmanuel C | OFFLINE | General | | New gamma gamma analysis | The level scheme is based on coherent check
of
1- gamma gamma
|
|
| Fixed | e793s |
Thu Mar 18 16:25:56 2021 |
Emmanuel C | OFFLINE | General | | Efficiency gamma AGATA --- real measurement run70 | [quote="Emmanuel C"] TF1 *fit_1 = new TF1("fit_1","TMath::Exp([0]+[1]*TMath::Log(x)+[2]*pow(TMath::Log(x),2.0)+[3]*pow(TMath::Log(x),3.0)+[4]*pow(TMath::Log(x),4.0))",10,5000);
//NRJ traite en keV et efficiency en %
|
|
| Fixed | e793s |
Tue Mar 23 10:22:48 2021 |
Emmanuel C | OFFLINE | General | | Efficiency gamma AGATA --- real measurement run70 |
I have been working on the high energy response.
The point is that we do not have source measurement |
|
| Fixed | e768s |
Sat Jul 13 16:28:30 2019 |
Diego Ramos | OTHER | General | N/A | Proton ToF from VAMOS ToF reconstruction | Comparison between the Proton ToF measured
directly with the TAC between MUST and CATS
(left) and the one recontructed from the |
|
| Fixed | e768s |
Fri Jul 19 15:15:47 2019 |
Diego Ramos | OFFLINE | General | LiF | 19Ne identification in VAMOS together with MUGAST | |
|
| Fixed | e768s |
Fri Jul 19 15:18:38 2019 |
Diego Ramos | OFFLINE | General | LiF | Position of 19Ne in dE:E in VAMOS | Conclusion: IC pressure not needed to be reduced. |
|
| Fixed | e768s |
Tue Jul 23 15:03:54 2019 |
Diego Ramos | OTHER | Hardware | N/A | Diamond threshold | The threshold of the Diamond was increased
from ~50 mV to ~300 mV |
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Thu Apr 11 06:38:12 2019 |
Diego | VAMOS | Hardware | | TACS modification | +300 ns of delay in the HF validated signal
that gives the STOP of T_FPMW_HF && T_CATS2_HF.
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Fri Apr 12 22:00:42 2019 |
Diego | TARGET | General | | very different target thickness | |
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Sat Apr 13 20:16:05 2019 |
Diego | VAMOS | General | | Vamos Efficiency | ***************************************RUN
118************************************************
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Sat Apr 13 22:40:00 2019 |
Diego | VAMOS | General | | Saturation in the WIRES of Drift chamber due to Pile-Up | There is Saturation in the Energy of the WIRES
due to the Pile-up, it is not urgent to correct
it because these parameters are not needed |
|
| Fixed | e768s |
Sat Jul 20 23:57:34 2019 |
Diego | OFFLINE | General | | VAMOS acceptance, comparison between 9+ and 10+ states | Figures above, simulation of VAMOS acceptance
for 10+ and 9+ 19Ne charge states. Ratio
between them quite big (0.58)
|
|
| Fixed | e768s |
Wed Jul 24 17:21:27 2019 |
Diego | OTHER | General | | VAMOS Acceptance with different positions of the beam in the target | |
|
| Fixed | e768s |
Sun Jul 21 09:10:50 2019 |
Didier & Nicolas | BEAM | General | N/A | Beam intensity check | [quote="Jenn & Franck"]OR Vamos: 1300 /s
Vamos gas profiler: 1.7x10^7 pps[/quote]
|
|