Fixed, e744s, Tue Apr 16 17:51:33 2019, Fairouz & Marlène, RUN, General, Carbon, Log and scalers RUN 134 @ 17h52 20x
|
| |
|
Fixed, e793s, Thu Mar 11 21:14:26 2021, Fairouz & Franco, OFFLINE, General, CD2, Plots run 51-56
|
Top left: kinematic plot with the main levels observed. The orange lines are (d,p), (d,t), (d,d) and (12C,12C) reactions by 47Ti. The yellow line is 47K(p,p),
the green line 47K(d,d).
Top right: in black Ex spectrum with gate on VAMOS, in red with also the gate on a gamma and scaled by a factor 3 for better comparison.
|
|
Fixed, com2019, Fri Apr 5 23:32:29 2019, Fairouz, CATS, General, CD2, Electronic changes
|
CATS detectors were removed.
For the MUVI stop, we send now HF propre.
|
|
Fixed, e793s, Mon Mar 15 11:45:42 2021, Emmanuel, Chloé, OFFLINE, General, CD2, 48K level scheme from gg analysis
|
| |
|
Ongoing, e793s, Fri Mar 12 12:58:10 2021, Emmanuel C, OFFLINE, General, , Gamma Gamma Analysis 7x
|
| |
|
Fixed, e793s, Sat Mar 13 18:37:01 2021, Emmanuel C, OFFLINE, General, , Efficiency gamma AGATA
|
TF1 *fit_1 = new TF1("fit_1","TMath::Exp([0]+[1]*TMath::Log(x)+[2]*pow(TMath::Log(x),2.0)+[3]*pow(TMath::Log(x),3.0)+[4]*pow(TMath::Log(x),4.0))",100,5000);
//NRJ traite en keV et efficiency en %
p0 -7.84071e+00
|
|
Ongoing, e793s, Wed Mar 17 15:17:39 2021, Emmanuel C, OFFLINE, General, , New gamma gamma analysis
|
The level scheme is based on coherent check of
1- gamma gamma
2- gamma gated by Ex
|
|
Fixed, e793s, Thu Mar 18 16:25:56 2021, Emmanuel C, OFFLINE, General, , Efficiency gamma AGATA --- real measurement run70
|
[quote="Emmanuel C"] TF1 *fit_1 = new TF1("fit_1","TMath::Exp([0]+[1]*TMath::Log(x)+[2]*pow(TMath::Log(x),2.0)+[3]*pow(TMath::Log(x),3.0)+[4]*pow(TMath::Log(x),4.0))",10,5000);
//NRJ traite en keV et efficiency en %
|
|
Fixed, e793s, Tue Mar 23 10:22:48 2021, Emmanuel C, OFFLINE, General, , Efficiency gamma AGATA --- real measurement run70
|
I have been working on the high energy response.
The point is that we do not have source measurement beyond 2 MeV to constrain the fit.
|
|
Fixed, e768s, Sat Jul 13 16:28:30 2019, Diego Ramos, OTHER, General, N/A, Proton ToF from VAMOS ToF reconstruction
|
Comparison between the Proton ToF measured directly with the TAC between MUST and CATS (left) and the one recontructed from the time diference between the
time MUGAST-VAMOS and the time Target-VAMOS (recontructed from the Brho) (right)
|
|
Fixed, e768s, Fri Jul 19 15:15:47 2019, Diego Ramos, OFFLINE, General, LiF, 19Ne identification in VAMOS together with MUGAST
|
| |
|
Fixed, e768s, Fri Jul 19 15:18:38 2019, Diego Ramos, OFFLINE, General, LiF, Position of 19Ne in dE:E in VAMOS
|
| Conclusion: IC pressure not needed to be reduced. |
|
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 23 15:03:54 2019, Diego Ramos, OTHER, Hardware, N/A, Diamond threshold
|
| The threshold of the Diamond was increased from ~50 mV to ~300 mV |
|
Fixed, e744s, Thu Apr 11 06:38:12 2019, Diego, VAMOS, Hardware, , TACS modification
|
+300 ns of delay in the HF validated signal that gives the STOP of T_FPMW_HF && T_CATS2_HF.
Range of TAC FPMW_CATS2 increased to 1us. |
|
Fixed, e744s, Fri Apr 12 22:00:42 2019, Diego, TARGET, General, , very different target thickness
|
| |
|
Fixed, e744s, Sat Apr 13 20:16:05 2019, Diego, VAMOS, General, , Vamos Efficiency
|
***************************************RUN 118************************************************
Forward (condition by before)
|
|
Fixed, e744s, Sat Apr 13 22:40:00 2019, Diego, VAMOS, General, , Saturation in the WIRES of Drift chamber due to Pile-Up
|
There is Saturation in the Energy of the WIRES due to the Pile-up, it is not urgent to correct it because these parameters are not needed for the reconstruction.
Tomorrow morning, when stopping the run, we should change the offsets in NUMEXO in order to better allocate the amplitude of the signals. |
|
Fixed, e768s, Sat Jul 20 23:57:34 2019, Diego, OFFLINE, General, , VAMOS acceptance, comparison between 9+ and 10+ states
|
Figures above, simulation of VAMOS acceptance for 10+ and 9+ 19Ne charge states. Ratio between them quite big (0.58)
Figures below, comparison of the states with offline data. Ratio much smaller.
It seems like acceptance doesn't cut the 10+ charge state too much, but 10+ is less produced than 9+. |
|
Fixed, e768s, Wed Jul 24 17:21:27 2019, Diego, OTHER, General, , VAMOS Acceptance with different positions of the beam in the target
|
| |
|
Fixed, e768s, Sun Jul 21 09:10:50 2019, Didier & Nicolas, BEAM, General, N/A, Beam intensity check
|
[quote="Jenn & Franck"]OR Vamos: 1300 /s
Vamos gas profiler: 1.7x10^7 pps[/quote]
|
|