MUST2 SAMURAI_2018 S3-LEB-LPC SUPERNEMO MUGAST EXPAND SCALP GALATRON HiCARI VELO
  MUGAST, Page 9 of 132  Not logged in MUGAST
Status ExpNbr Date Authordown Type Category Target-Source Subject
FixedTEST Tue Mar 5 16:42:56 2019 iulian MarleneMUST2SoftwareN/Arun 79 Gamme 600 ns Time Calibration run (Calimero) on MUVI 3 MM2 X . good run
Run 79

Run 78 bad
Calimero on Muvi3 MM2(X)

Gamme 600 ns

Procedure:

0) HT on the detectors Off
1) Apply Das config
2) Put Das offline
3) Start Geco
4) Activate on each of the sector to calibrate the X side (see bellow image)
5) execute Calimero.exe in calimero directory
6) modify the calimero config on Geco (see bellow near config button)
7) Start the run in RCC
8) Start calimero (start button in Geco)
Attachment 1: run79_calimero_mm2X_spectra.png
run79_calimero_mm2X_spectra.png
FixedTEST Tue Mar 5 17:11:29 2019 iulian MarleneMUST2SoftwareN/Arun 81 Gamme 600 ns Time Calibration run (Calimero) on MUVI 3 MM3 X . good run
Run 81

Run 80 bad
Calimero on Muvi3 MM3(X)

Gamme 600 ns

Procedure:

0) HT on the detectors Off
1) Apply Das config
2) Put Das offline
3) Start Geco
4) Activate on each of the sector to calibrate the X side (see bellow image)
5) execute Calimero.exe in calimero directory
6) modify the calimero config on Geco (see bellow near config button)
7) Start the run in RCC
8) Start calimero (start button in Geco)
Attachment 1: run81_calimero_mm3X_spectra.png
run81_calimero_mm3X_spectra.png
FixedTEST Tue Mar 5 17:48:38 2019 iulian MarleneMUST2SoftwareN/Arun 82 Gamme 600 ns Time Calibration run (Calimero) on MUVI 3 MM4 X . good run
Run 82

Calimero on Muvi3 MM4(X)

Gamme 600 ns
Attachment 1: run82_calimero_mm4X_spectra.png
run82_calimero_mm4X_spectra.png
FixedTEST Tue Mar 5 18:03:24 2019 iulian MarleneMUST2SoftwareN/ACalimero problem on Y side
Calimero not working properly on Y side of any mm detector
Attachment 1: run83_calimero_mm4Y_spectra.png
run83_calimero_mm4Y_spectra.png
Attachment 2: run834calimero_mm2Y_spectra.png
run834calimero_mm2Y_spectra.png
FixedTEST Tue Mar 5 18:18:46 2019 iulian MarleneMUST2Hardware3-alpharun 97 3a run Muvi3 night run
Run 87

stop@ 5:42 am

3a run Muvi3 (MM)
-4 deg
pedestals aligned and suppressed
Attachment 1: run87_3alpha_4mm_spectra.png
run87_3alpha_4mm_spectra.png
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 01:57:08 2019 iulian Jaromir ValerianVAMOSHardwareN/AVamos efficiency 125_0
to obtain it:
>lpcgrit
>npp mugast
>root offline/root_vamos/run_xxx.root
root [1] .L macros/EffCheck.C
root [2] EffChechk()
================== Time split version of scripts: ~/analysis/nptool/Projects/MUGAST/macros/EffCheck.C
==== guesses an hour length, works for 122, 125
==== see the output bellow
==== modified code in attachment

Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.7121%
IC 1 93.4805%
IC 2 93.6874%
IC 3 95.111%
----------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.7834%
IC 2 93.8809%
IC 3 92.1641%
IC 4 91.0911%
----------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 89.3256%
DC WIRE 1 89.5065%
DC WIRE 2 88.2744%
DC WIRE 3 91.7775%
----------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 81.3829%
DCX1 81.3837%
DCX2 83.0758%
DCX3 82.449%
----------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 72.9503%
----------------------



root [3] .x macros/EffCheck.C
============================================================
offline/root_vamos/run_0125_0.root
============================================================
Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow
min 5645191654671913001
max 5746769951007854244
delta 101578296335941243
delta 4.3 hours EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT
1hour==23622862570130036



=========================================================
i... HOUR: 2
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.9316%
IC 1 93.7101%
IC 2 93.8214%
IC 3 95.3857%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.9656%
IC 2 93.9186%
IC 3 92.1004%
IC 4 91.0845%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 90.7057%
DC WIRE 1 90.8913%
DC WIRE 2 89.7104%
DC WIRE 3 92.1789%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 82.8504%
DCX1 82.9172%
DCX2 84.0074%
DCX3 83.3231%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 74.9742%
----------------------------

=========================================================
i... HOUR: 4
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.6848%
IC 1 93.4008%
IC 2 93.6383%
IC 3 94.9419%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.6902%
IC 2 93.8594%
IC 3 92.1954%
IC 4 91.0825%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 88.811%
DC WIRE 1 89.0412%
DC WIRE 2 87.7612%
DC WIRE 3 91.4577%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 80.8638%
DCX1 80.7706%
DCX2 82.6961%
DCX3 82.0982%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 72.2419%
----------------------------

=========================================================
i... HOUR: 6
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.3355%
IC 1 93.4695%
IC 2 93.5595%
IC 3 95.0589%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.8846%
IC 2 93.8857%
IC 3 92.1605%
IC 4 91.2521%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 88.2688%
DC WIRE 1 88.3611%
DC WIRE 2 87.006%
DC WIRE 3 91.6316%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 79.9095%
DCX1 80.0215%
DCX2 82.2048%
DCX3 81.5886%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 71.1065%
----------------------------
root [4]
Attachment 1: EffCheck.C

void chkef( ULong64_t low, ULong64_t high,   ULong64_t n ){
  cout<<endl;
  cout<< "=========================================================\n" ;
  cout<<"i... HOUR: "<<n<<endl; //"     "<<low<<" "<<high<<endl;
  string sep = "----------------------------\n" ;



  TTree *t1 = (TTree*) gROOT->FindObject("AD");

  TH1F * hc = new TH1F("hc","hc",2000,0.1,50);
  TH1F * ht = new TH1F("ht","ht",2000,0.1,50);


  TString cond=  Form("(((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)>=%lld)&&(((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)<%lld)",low,high);
  TString condad=Form("&&( (((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)>=%lld)&&(((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)<%lld) )",low,high);


  // cout<<cond<<endl<<condad<<endl;


      cout << "Forward (condition by before)" << endl; 
  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>ht",i+1),cond.Data() ,"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>hc",i+1),Form("IC[%d]>0.1 %s",i,condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "IC " << i << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }

  cout << sep ;


  cout << "Backward  (condition by after)" << endl; 

  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>ht",i),cond.Data() ,"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>hc",i),Form("IC[%d]>0.1 %s",i+1,  condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "IC " << i+1 << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }
cout << sep ;

 cout << "DC  (condition by IC[0])" << endl; 

  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>ht"),cond.Data(),"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>hc"),Form("EWIRE_%d>100 %s",i, condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "DC WIRE " << i << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }
cout << sep ;

cout << "DC X  (condition by IC[0])" << endl; 

  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>ht"),cond.Data(),"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>hc"),Form("DC%d_X>-1500  %s",i, condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "DCX" << i << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }

cout << sep ;


cout << "Xf  (condition by IC[0])" << endl; 

      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>ht"),cond.Data() ,"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>hc"),Form("Xf>-1500 %s", condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "Xf " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;


cout << sep ;


 delete hc;
 delete ht;
}



/*
ORIGINAL NAME but  now the original code for VAMOS eff is above
 */
void EffCheck()
{

  ULong64_t hour;
  ULong64_t LTSmin=-1;
  ULong64_t LTSmax=-1;
  ULong64_t LTS,VTS,RTS, tmin,tmax,tmp;
 
  cout<< "============================================================\n" ;
  cout<<"          "<<gFile->GetName()<<endl;
  cout<< "============================================================\n" ;


  cout<<"Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow"<<endl;
  TTree *tree= (TTree*)gDirectory->Get("AD");
  tree->SetBranchAddress("LTS",&LTS);
  tree->SetBranchAddress("VTS",&VTS);
  tree->SetBranchAddress("RTS",&RTS);
  
  
 for (int i=1;i<tree->GetEntries();i++){
   tree->GetEntry(i);
   tmp=(RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS;
   if ((LTS>0)&&(tmp>1e+14)){  //================== kill some low values?
     if ((LTSmin>tmp) || (LTSmin==-1)){
       LTSmin=tmp;
     }
     if ((LTSmax<tmp) || (LTSmax==-1)){
       LTSmax=tmp;
     }
   }
 }


 //tree->Draw("(RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS>>h(10000)","","");
 //  Long64_t LTSmin=AD->GetV1()[0];
 //  AD->Draw("RTS<<32+VTS<<16+LTS","LTS>0","goff", 1, AD->GetEntries()-1 );
 //  Long64_t LTSmax=AD->GetV1()[0];
 cout<<"min    "<<LTSmin<<" "<<endl;
 cout<<"max    "<<LTSmax<<" "<< endl;
 cout<<"delta  "<<LTSmax-LTSmin<<endl;
 cout<<"delta  "<<(LTSmax-LTSmin)/100/1e+6/3600/282162*4.3<<" hours  EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT"<<endl;
 hour=143567947269965277/6.0775;
 cout<<"1hour=="<<hour<<endl<<endl<<endl;
 //==========================================================================================

 ULong64_t n=0;
 int hourstep=2;
 for (ULong64_t i=LTSmin; i<LTSmax; i+=hour*hourstep){
   n=n+1;
   chkef( i, i+hour , n*hourstep);
 }

  return NULL;




}
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 15:36:48 2019 iulian Francois Fairouz CatalinOFFLINEGeneralCH2looking for gamma proton events
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf -> thin target ELab protons vs Brho 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf -> thick target ELab protons vs Brho 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf -> thin target ELab protons vs Etot 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf -> thick target ELab protons vs Etot 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho 14O Vamos.


+ simulations
Attachment 1: elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf
Attachment 2: elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf
Attachment 3: elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_ThinTar.pdf
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_ThinTar.pdf
Attachment 4: elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_ThickTar.pdf
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_ThickTar.pdf
Attachment 5: 1504b.jpg
1504b.jpg
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 21:58:15 2019 iulian BeyhanVAMOSHardwareCH2Xf efficiency evolution
Xf efficiency (normalized to CATS intensity) is directly linked with the beam intensity. The image below show a comparison between normalised Xf spectra on 3 different runs taken with different beam intensities:
Run 122 2019-04-13 06:31:00 4e+4
Run 130 2019-04-15 15:23:00 2.5e+5
Run 131 2019-04-15 20:41:00 2.5e+4

No dependence on time, dependence on intensity.
Attachment 1: Xf_efficency_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Xf_efficency_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
FixedTEST Mon Mar 4 13:54:24 2019 iulian & ValerianGRITHardware3-alpharun 50 3-alpha short run
RUN 50
First 3a test with all Must2 detectors. HV on all set to 50 V for this test only to avoid any risks
Attachment 1: run50_3a_Must.png
run50_3a_Must.png
Attachment 2: run50_3a_Must2.png
run50_3a_Must2.png
FixedTEST Fri Feb 22 11:56:53 2019 iulian GRITHardware3-alpharun 38 3-alpha with reordering of the MUGAST cables for the logic and analogic signals
Run 38

Alpha source run for trapezoid detectors during the night with pedestals aligned (with HV on) and zero suppression. Cooling at 15°C.
Thresholds at 500 keV.

Important:
The MUGAST signal cables (logic & analogic) have been reordered:


On MUVI1
ChannelSpectra LabelDetectorVoltage
1 MG1 MG1 140V
2 MG3 MG3 160V
3 MG4 MG4 95V
4 MG5 MG5 150V



On MUVI2:
ChannelSpectra LabelDetectorVoltage
1 MG7 MG7 120V
2 MG9 MG1160V
3 MG10 -- --
4 MG11 -- --


TRIGGERS are:
GMT ch1 --> OR MUVI1
GMT ch2 --> OR MUVI2
GMT ch3 --> OR MUVI3 (nothing on it)
Attachment 1: run38_3alpha_mg1345.png
run38_3alpha_mg1345.png
Attachment 2: run38_3alpha_mg711.png
run38_3alpha_mg711.png
FixedTEST Fri Feb 22 15:54:30 2019 iulian GRITHardware3-alpharun 40 3-alpha night run
Run 40

Alpha source run for trapezoid detectors during the night with pedestals aligned (with HV off) and zero suppression. Cooling at 15°C.
Thresholds at 500 keV.


On MUVI1
ChannelSpectra LabelDetectorVoltage
1 MG1 MG1 140V
2 MG3 MG3 160V
3 MG4 MG4 95V
4 MG5 MG5 150V



On MUVI2:
ChannelSpectra LabelDetectorVoltage
1 MG7 MG7 120V
2 MG9 MG1160V
3 MG10 -- --
4 MG11 -- --


TRIGGERS are:
GMT ch1 --> OR MUVI1
GMT ch2 --> OR MUVI2
GMT ch3 --> OR MUVI3 (nothing on it)

[S]Problem MG5?!
[/S]---> No real problem, just spectra definition on plot was incorrect
Attachment 1: run40_3alpha_mg1345.png
run40_3alpha_mg1345.png
Attachment 2: run40_3alpha_mg79.png
run40_3alpha_mg79.png
FixedTEST Thu Feb 21 18:14:48 2019 iulianGRITHardware3-alphaACQ problem run 34 3 alfa with MG1,MG3,MG4,MG5,MG7,MG9

Alpha source run for trapezoid detectors + anulaire detector with pedestals aligned (with HV Frown ) and zero suppression. Cooling at 15°C.
Thresholds at 500 keV.

On MUVI1:

1--> MG5 (150V)
2--> MG4 (95V)
3--> MG3 (160V)
4--> MG11 (60V)

On MUVI2:
5--> MG7 (120V)
6--> MG1 (140V)
7--> --
8--> --

TRIGGERS are:
GMT ch1 --> OR MUVI1
GMT ch2 --> OR MUVI2
GMT ch3 --> OR MUVI3 (nothing on it)

PROBLEM ACQ , MUVI2 has no validations (DECS). MUVI1 OK!. Looks like a problem on the catchslave actor of Narval as no events seems to pass trough

The problem was caused by the cable used to triger the GMTSlave from the FanIn FanOut.
Attachment 1: acq_problem_21and22fevrier.png
acq_problem_21and22fevrier.png
FixedTEST Fri Feb 22 14:36:35 2019 iulianMUST2Hardware3-alphatest new cable for Must2 detectors. Cables OK!
Cables put on Muvi3.
Testing procedure. Use the numbered cables to conect the annular detector (MG11) and check if ok: GECO writting on MUVI3 , ORD Present, DECS present, STOP present.
Couldn't check the spectra as they do not exist.

MUVI3

Entry 1Entry 2Entry 3Entry 4
Cable 1Cable 2Cable 3Cable 4
GECO writting OKOKOKOK
ORD Present OKOKOKOK
DECS Present NONONONO
STOP Present OKOKOKOK
FixedTEST Tue Mar 5 10:16:03 2019 iulianMUST2SoftwareN/Arun 57 Gamme 300 ns Time Calibration run (Calimero) on MUVI 3 (MUST) X sectors more stats (10000)
RUNS 53,54,55,56 are bad runs

Run 57


Calimero on Muvi3 MM1(X)

Gamme 300 ns

Procedure:

0) HT on the detectors Off
1) Apply Das config
2) Put Das offline
3) Start Geco
4) Activate on each of the sector to calibrate the X side (see bellow image)
5) execute Calimero.exe in calimero directory
6) modify the calimero config on Geco (see bellow near config button)
7) Start the run in RCC
8) Start calimero (start button in Geco)
Attachment 1: run57_calimero_config.png
run57_calimero_config.png
Attachment 2: run57_calimero_mm1.png
run57_calimero_mm1.png
Fixed  Mon Apr 8 07:54:53 2019 iulianMUST2Hardware end alpha contamination run
Problem M3 EY , moving piedestal... See below
Alfa spectra have changed, no longer continuous excepting partially MM2.
Attachment 1: bilan_run262_bck_mugast4.png
bilan_run262_bck_mugast4.png
Attachment 2: bilan_run262_bck_mugast3.png
bilan_run262_bck_mugast3.png
Attachment 3: bilan_run262_bck_mugast2.png
bilan_run262_bck_mugast2.png
Attachment 4: bilan_run262_bck_mugast1.png
bilan_run262_bck_mugast1.png
Fixed  Mon Apr 8 08:01:04 2019 iulianMUST2Hardware swiching off HV & BT (in that order)
switching off HV & BT now :
>lpcgrit
>hvm_print MUST2
> hvm_group HV-CsI off
>hvm_group HV-Si off
>hvm_group BTMG-A off
>hvm_group BTMG-B off
>hvm_print MUST2
>hvm_print VAMOS
Attachment 1: HV_mugast_end1.png
HV_mugast_end1.png
Attachment 2: HV_mugast_end2.png
HV_mugast_end2.png
Attachment 3: HV_mugast_end3.png
HV_mugast_end3.png
Attachment 4: HV_mugast_end4.png
HV_mugast_end4.png
Fixede744s Mon Apr 8 08:30:50 2019 iulianOTHERGeneralN/AE744s to-do list , proposal and other relevant documents
To do list

- ask final beam energy for the 14O beam (include CATS removal)-> E=7.60 MeV/u Done
- Mount CATS timing (much thinner) at Cats1 position -> no need -> Cats stay as they are
- make a hole target, diameter = 7 mm, thick target (Al?) Done
- dismount targets with gloves due to the contamination done
- mount targets (list ..… + hole target)
Target list ( Hole Target, 104 um CH2 , 100 um CH2, C target 75 um, 104 um CH2 ) done

- remove the Vamos entrance DCs done
- install the VAMOS finger, larger one, no need to change finger, stay as it is
- Id plots with Vamos
- to mount / or not a MCP -> we stay with cats
- Prepare Agata Or - HFpropre and Agata 52 – HFpropre for beam intensity monitoring.
- Solve the MM3 EY problems (see previous elog entry)
- Understand Vamos (40% efficency) (advances) and Agata efficiency (5% efficiency Agata instead of 10%) (seams that maximum efficiency is 8%-9%, despite having 10 % for Europium) for 2H(16O,p)17O
- Make an acq run with Mugast in air to understand if detectors contaminated done with conclusion ??

You will find:
E744s.pdf last infos about E744
Proposal__15F_6.pdf the proposal as it was for 2018 Lise run
time_request_E744.pdf time request for Vamos-Agata run
Attachment 1: Proposal__15F_v6.pdf
Proposal__15F_v6.pdf Proposal__15F_v6.pdf Proposal__15F_v6.pdf Proposal__15F_v6.pdf Proposal__15F_v6.pdf
Attachment 2: time_request_E744.pdf
time_request_E744.pdf time_request_E744.pdf time_request_E744.pdf time_request_E744.pdf
Attachment 3: e744s.pdf
e744s.pdf e744s.pdf e744s.pdf e744s.pdf e744s.pdf e744s.pdf e744s.pdf
Fixede744s Mon Apr 8 18:47:54 2019 iulianOTHERHardwareN/Atodo to do list for Tuesday and 14N beam todo list
To do list

- Id plots with Vamos
- Prepare Agata Or - HFpropre and Agata 52 – HFpropre for beam intensity monitoring.
- Check the E_Agata inside Mugast acq why is not working
- Check that Or Agata is divided only when goes to trigger not before fan-in fan out
- Obtain the E_Agata spectra and T_Agata_HF spectra in the acq (ckeck ADC entry ok)
- Solve the MM3 EY problems
- Understand Vamos (40% efficency) (advances, the finger cuts 20%, the other 20 % might be due to the beam time structure) and Agata efficiency (5% efficiency Agata instead of 10%) (seams that maximum efficiency is 8%-9%, despite having 10 % for Eu source) for 2H(16O,p)17O
- write a document about starting the acq from scratch
- Prepare the Vigru pages for Vamos & Mugast to be checked by the peoples in Shifts
- Prepare the similar online check list for Agata

- Add Beam Blocker into the acq scalers
Attachment 1: e744s.pdf
e744s.pdf e744s.pdf e744s.pdf e744s.pdf e744s.pdf e744s.pdf e744s.pdf
Attachment 2: E744_14N.pdf
E744_14N.pdf
Fixede744s Mon Apr 8 21:39:44 2019 iulianOTHERGeneralN/AShifts table
The shifts table can be found here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aSb4BMzkrwLzM2DuRUAoXhBwFCiFX-pbhQ1_CPxwRts/edit?usp=sharing
Do not forget to fill this and also add your name, institution and email as you can find in the example (look for "IS")
Fixede744s Wed Apr 10 11:46:04 2019 iulianBEAMSocialN/AE744 Status
Refrigeration problem, beam stopped.
Optimistic estimation: they need 1 UT to setup CIME => 14N could be back around 20h.
Optimistic scenario still on track
Then need 2 UT's to set CSS1 -> 14O next day around 18h
No shifts until 24h00 (midnight) today.
Shift to resume 11/04 @00h00


18h30 14N beam is back.

ELOG Home Page