| Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
| Fixed | TEST |
Tue Mar 5 16:42:56 2019 |
iulian Marlene | MUST2 | Software | N/A | run 79 Gamme 600 ns Time Calibration run (Calimero) on MUVI 3 MM2 X . good run |
Run 79
Run 78 bad
Calimero on Muvi3 MM2(X)
Gamme 600 ns
Procedure:
0) HT on the detectors Off
1) Apply Das config
2) Put Das offline
3) Start Geco
4) Activate on each of the sector to calibrate the X side (see bellow image)
5) execute Calimero.exe in calimero directory
6) modify the calimero config on Geco (see bellow near config button)
7) Start the run in RCC
8) Start calimero (start button in Geco) |
| Fixed | TEST |
Tue Mar 5 17:11:29 2019 |
iulian Marlene | MUST2 | Software | N/A | run 81 Gamme 600 ns Time Calibration run (Calimero) on MUVI 3 MM3 X . good run |
Run 81
Run 80 bad
Calimero on Muvi3 MM3(X)
Gamme 600 ns
Procedure:
0) HT on the detectors Off
1) Apply Das config
2) Put Das offline
3) Start Geco
4) Activate on each of the sector to calibrate the X side (see bellow image)
5) execute Calimero.exe in calimero directory
6) modify the calimero config on Geco (see bellow near config button)
7) Start the run in RCC
8) Start calimero (start button in Geco) |
| Fixed | TEST |
Tue Mar 5 17:48:38 2019 |
iulian Marlene | MUST2 | Software | N/A | run 82 Gamme 600 ns Time Calibration run (Calimero) on MUVI 3 MM4 X . good run |
Run 82
Calimero on Muvi3 MM4(X)
Gamme 600 ns |
| Fixed | TEST |
Tue Mar 5 18:03:24 2019 |
iulian Marlene | MUST2 | Software | N/A | Calimero problem on Y side |
| Calimero not working properly on Y side of any mm detector |
| Fixed | TEST |
Tue Mar 5 18:18:46 2019 |
iulian Marlene | MUST2 | Hardware | 3-alpha | run 97 3a run Muvi3 night run |
Run 87
stop@ 5:42 am
3a run Muvi3 (MM)
-4 deg
pedestals aligned and suppressed |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 01:57:08 2019 |
iulian Jaromir Valerian | VAMOS | Hardware | N/A | Vamos efficiency 125_0 |
to obtain it:
>lpcgrit
>npp mugast
>root offline/root_vamos/run_xxx.root
root [1] .L macros/EffCheck.C
root [2] EffChechk()
================== Time split version of scripts: ~/analysis/nptool/Projects/MUGAST/macros/EffCheck.C
==== guesses an hour length, works for 122, 125
==== see the output bellow
==== modified code in attachment
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.7121%
IC 1 93.4805%
IC 2 93.6874%
IC 3 95.111%
----------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.7834%
IC 2 93.8809%
IC 3 92.1641%
IC 4 91.0911%
----------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 89.3256%
DC WIRE 1 89.5065%
DC WIRE 2 88.2744%
DC WIRE 3 91.7775%
----------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 81.3829%
DCX1 81.3837%
DCX2 83.0758%
DCX3 82.449%
----------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 72.9503%
----------------------
root [3] .x macros/EffCheck.C
============================================================
offline/root_vamos/run_0125_0.root
============================================================
Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow
min 5645191654671913001
max 5746769951007854244
delta 101578296335941243
delta 4.3 hours EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT
1hour==23622862570130036
=========================================================
i... HOUR: 2
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.9316%
IC 1 93.7101%
IC 2 93.8214%
IC 3 95.3857%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.9656%
IC 2 93.9186%
IC 3 92.1004%
IC 4 91.0845%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 90.7057%
DC WIRE 1 90.8913%
DC WIRE 2 89.7104%
DC WIRE 3 92.1789%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 82.8504%
DCX1 82.9172%
DCX2 84.0074%
DCX3 83.3231%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 74.9742%
----------------------------
=========================================================
i... HOUR: 4
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.6848%
IC 1 93.4008%
IC 2 93.6383%
IC 3 94.9419%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.6902%
IC 2 93.8594%
IC 3 92.1954%
IC 4 91.0825%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 88.811%
DC WIRE 1 89.0412%
DC WIRE 2 87.7612%
DC WIRE 3 91.4577%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 80.8638%
DCX1 80.7706%
DCX2 82.6961%
DCX3 82.0982%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 72.2419%
----------------------------
=========================================================
i... HOUR: 6
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.3355%
IC 1 93.4695%
IC 2 93.5595%
IC 3 95.0589%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.8846%
IC 2 93.8857%
IC 3 92.1605%
IC 4 91.2521%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 88.2688%
DC WIRE 1 88.3611%
DC WIRE 2 87.006%
DC WIRE 3 91.6316%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 79.9095%
DCX1 80.0215%
DCX2 82.2048%
DCX3 81.5886%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 71.1065%
----------------------------
root [4] |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 15:36:48 2019 |
iulian Francois Fairouz Catalin | OFFLINE | General | CH2 | looking for gamma proton events |
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf -> thin target ELab protons vs Brho 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf -> thick target ELab protons vs Brho 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf -> thin target ELab protons vs Etot 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf -> thick target ELab protons vs Etot 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho 14O Vamos.
+ simulations |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 21:58:15 2019 |
iulian Beyhan | VAMOS | Hardware | CH2 | Xf efficiency evolution |
Xf efficiency (normalized to CATS intensity) is directly linked with the beam intensity. The image below show a comparison between normalised Xf spectra on 3 different runs taken with different beam intensities:
Run 122 2019-04-13 06:31:00 4e+4
Run 130 2019-04-15 15:23:00 2.5e+5
Run 131 2019-04-15 20:41:00 2.5e+4
No dependence on time, dependence on intensity. |
| Fixed | TEST |
Mon Mar 4 13:54:24 2019 |
iulian & Valerian | GRIT | Hardware | 3-alpha | run 50 3-alpha short run |
RUN 50
First 3a test with all Must2 detectors. HV on all set to 50 V for this test only to avoid any risks |
| Fixed | TEST |
Fri Feb 22 11:56:53 2019 |
iulian | GRIT | Hardware | 3-alpha | run 38 3-alpha with reordering of the MUGAST cables for the logic and analogic signals |
Run 38
Alpha source run for trapezoid detectors during the night with pedestals aligned (with HV on) and zero suppression. Cooling at 15°C.
Thresholds at 500 keV.
Important:
The MUGAST signal cables (logic & analogic) have been reordered:
On MUVI1
|
Channel | Spectra Label | Detector | Voltage
| |
1 | MG1 | MG1 | 140V
| |
2 | MG3 | MG3 | 160V
| |
3 | MG4 | MG4 | 95V
| |
4 | MG5 | MG5 | 150V
|
On MUVI2:
|
Channel | Spectra Label | Detector | Voltage
| |
1 | MG7 | MG7 | 120V
| |
2 | MG9 | MG11 | 60V
| |
3 | MG10 | -- | --
| |
4 | MG11 | -- | --
|
TRIGGERS are:
GMT ch1 --> OR MUVI1
GMT ch2 --> OR MUVI2
GMT ch3 --> OR MUVI3 (nothing on it) |
| Fixed | TEST |
Fri Feb 22 15:54:30 2019 |
iulian | GRIT | Hardware | 3-alpha | run 40 3-alpha night run |
Run 40
Alpha source run for trapezoid detectors during the night with pedestals aligned (with HV off) and zero suppression. Cooling at 15°C.
Thresholds at 500 keV.
On MUVI1
|
Channel | Spectra Label | Detector | Voltage
| |
1 | MG1 | MG1 | 140V
| |
2 | MG3 | MG3 | 160V
| |
3 | MG4 | MG4 | 95V
| |
4 | MG5 | MG5 | 150V
|
On MUVI2:
|
Channel | Spectra Label | Detector | Voltage
| |
1 | MG7 | MG7 | 120V
| |
2 | MG9 | MG11 | 60V
| |
3 | MG10 | -- | --
| |
4 | MG11 | -- | --
|
TRIGGERS are:
GMT ch1 --> OR MUVI1
GMT ch2 --> OR MUVI2
GMT ch3 --> OR MUVI3 (nothing on it)
[S]Problem MG5?![/S]---> No real problem, just spectra definition on plot was incorrect |
| Fixed | TEST |
Thu Feb 21 18:14:48 2019 |
iulian | GRIT | Hardware | 3-alpha | ACQ problem run 34 3 alfa with MG1,MG3,MG4,MG5,MG7,MG9 |
Alpha source run for trapezoid detectors + anulaire detector with pedestals aligned (with HV  ) and zero suppression. Cooling at 15°C.
Thresholds at 500 keV.
On MUVI1:
1--> MG5 (150V)
2--> MG4 (95V)
3--> MG3 (160V)
4--> MG11 (60V)
On MUVI2:
5--> MG7 (120V)
6--> MG1 (140V)
7--> --
8--> --
TRIGGERS are:
GMT ch1 --> OR MUVI1
GMT ch2 --> OR MUVI2
GMT ch3 --> OR MUVI3 (nothing on it)
PROBLEM ACQ , MUVI2 has no validations (DECS). MUVI1 OK!. Looks like a problem on the catchslave actor of Narval as no events seems to pass trough
The problem was caused by the cable used to triger the GMTSlave from the FanIn FanOut. |
| Fixed | TEST |
Fri Feb 22 14:36:35 2019 |
iulian | MUST2 | Hardware | 3-alpha | test new cable for Must2 detectors. Cables OK! |
Cables put on Muvi3.
Testing procedure. Use the numbered cables to conect the annular detector (MG11) and check if ok: GECO writting on MUVI3 , ORD Present, DECS present, STOP present.
Couldn't check the spectra as they do not exist.
MUVI3
|
| Entry 1 | Entry 2 | Entry 3 | Entry 4 | |
| Cable 1 | Cable 2 | Cable 3 | Cable 4 | |
GECO writting | OK | OK | OK | OK | |
ORD Present | OK | OK | OK | OK | |
DECS Present | NO | NO | NO | NO | |
STOP Present | OK | OK | OK | OK | |
|
|
| Fixed | TEST |
Tue Mar 5 10:16:03 2019 |
iulian | MUST2 | Software | N/A | run 57 Gamme 300 ns Time Calibration run (Calimero) on MUVI 3 (MUST) X sectors more stats (10000) |
RUNS 53,54,55,56 are bad runs
Run 57
Calimero on Muvi3 MM1(X)
Gamme 300 ns
Procedure:
0) HT on the detectors Off
1) Apply Das config
2) Put Das offline
3) Start Geco
4) Activate on each of the sector to calibrate the X side (see bellow image)
5) execute Calimero.exe in calimero directory
6) modify the calimero config on Geco (see bellow near config button)
7) Start the run in RCC
8) Start calimero (start button in Geco) |
| Fixed | |
Mon Apr 8 07:54:53 2019 |
iulian | MUST2 | Hardware | | end alpha contamination run |
Problem M3 EY , moving piedestal... See below
Alfa spectra have changed, no longer continuous excepting partially MM2. |
| Fixed | |
Mon Apr 8 08:01:04 2019 |
iulian | MUST2 | Hardware | | swiching off HV & BT (in that order) |
switching off HV & BT now :
>lpcgrit
>hvm_print MUST2
> hvm_group HV-CsI off
>hvm_group HV-Si off
>hvm_group BTMG-A off
>hvm_group BTMG-B off
>hvm_print MUST2
>hvm_print VAMOS |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 8 08:30:50 2019 |
iulian | OTHER | General | N/A | E744s to-do list , proposal and other relevant documents |
To do list
- ask final beam energy for the 14O beam (include CATS removal)-> E=7.60 MeV/u Done
- Mount CATS timing (much thinner) at Cats1 position -> no need -> Cats stay as they are
- make a hole target, diameter = 7 mm, thick target (Al?) Done
- dismount targets with gloves due to the contamination done
- mount targets (list ..… + hole target)
Target list ( Hole Target, 104 um CH2 , 100 um CH2, C target 75 um, 104 um CH2 ) done
- remove the Vamos entrance DCs done
- install the VAMOS finger, larger one, no need to change finger, stay as it is
- Id plots with Vamos
- to mount / or not a MCP -> we stay with cats
- Prepare Agata Or - HFpropre and Agata 52 – HFpropre for beam intensity monitoring.
- Solve the MM3 EY problems (see previous elog entry)
- Understand Vamos (40% efficency) (advances) and Agata efficiency (5% efficiency Agata instead of 10%) (seams that maximum efficiency is 8%-9%, despite having 10 % for Europium) for 2H(16O,p)17O
- Make an acq run with Mugast in air to understand if detectors contaminated done with conclusion ??
You will find:
E744s.pdf last infos about E744
Proposal__15F_6.pdf the proposal as it was for 2018 Lise run
time_request_E744.pdf time request for Vamos-Agata run |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 8 18:47:54 2019 |
iulian | OTHER | Hardware | N/A | todo to do list for Tuesday and 14N beam todo list |
To do list
- Id plots with Vamos
- Prepare Agata Or - HFpropre and Agata 52 – HFpropre for beam intensity monitoring.
- Check the E_Agata inside Mugast acq why is not working
- Check that Or Agata is divided only when goes to trigger not before fan-in fan out
- Obtain the E_Agata spectra and T_Agata_HF spectra in the acq (ckeck ADC entry ok)
- Solve the MM3 EY problems
- Understand Vamos (40% efficency) (advances, the finger cuts 20%, the other 20 % might be due to the beam time structure) and Agata efficiency (5% efficiency Agata instead of 10%) (seams that maximum efficiency is 8%-9%, despite having 10 % for Eu source) for 2H(16O,p)17O
- write a document about starting the acq from scratch
- Prepare the Vigru pages for Vamos & Mugast to be checked by the peoples in Shifts
- Prepare the similar online check list for Agata
- Add Beam Blocker into the acq scalers |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 8 21:39:44 2019 |
iulian | OTHER | General | N/A | Shifts table |
The shifts table can be found here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aSb4BMzkrwLzM2DuRUAoXhBwFCiFX-pbhQ1_CPxwRts/edit?usp=sharing
Do not forget to fill this and also add your name, institution and email as you can find in the example (look for "IS") |
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 10 11:46:04 2019 |
iulian | BEAM | Social | N/A | E744 Status |
Refrigeration problem, beam stopped.
Optimistic estimation: they need 1 UT to setup CIME => 14N could be back around 20h.
Optimistic scenario still on track
Then need 2 UT's to set CSS1 -> 14O next day around 18h
No shifts until 24h00 (midnight) today.
Shift to resume 11/04 @00h00
18h30 14N beam is back. |