MUST2 SAMURAI_2018 S3-LEB-LPC SUPERNEMO MUGAST EXPAND SCALP GALATRON HiCARI VELO
  MUGAST, Page 36 of 127  Not logged in MUGAST
Fixed, TEST, Mon Apr 15 13:07:43 2019, OttoH.V., OTHER, Hardware, N/A, HVM_ERROR 
*** hvm watcher error ***
cats2 Slot: 13 (A1835 ) Channel:1 Vmon: 580.2 V Imon: 0.76 uA Status: OVER CURRENT

Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 13:10:53 2019, OttoRun, RUN, General, CH2, Run128 
*************************
Run : 128
*************************

Start at 2019-04-15 13:09:31.968266

Run Conditions:
  • Operator: Nikola Damien Fairouz
  • Trigger: MUGAST + Vamos %1000 + CATS %30000
  • Target #3
  • Beam: 14O
  • Intensity: ~1e5
  • Brho = 0.519964 Tm
  • CATS2 in
  • Finger at +12 mm
  • WITH AGATA


Comment:
Start Target 3: 100 um
VAMOS is Open
AGATA Coupling
New thresholds on VAMOS DC0 and DC3 (same as run 126)
New thresholds MUST2 (same as run126)

Stop at 2019-04-15 14:06:10.922268
Stop comment: end run 128 for VAMOS detectors electronic setting changes
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 13:22:56 2019, Nikola Faïrouz Damien Ksenia, RUN, General, CH2, Scalers Run 128 21x

Run 128, same conditions then run 126
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 13:28:25 2019, Nikola Faïrouz Damien Ksenia, RUN, General, CH2, Beam intensity increased to 1.8e5 pps run128_1_scalers_2.png
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 14:09:25 2019, OttoRun, RUN, General, CH2, Run129 
*************************
Run : 129
*************************

Start at 2019-04-15 14:08:14.763458

Run Conditions:
  • Operator: Nikola Damien Fairouz Ksenia
  • Trigger: MUGAST + Vamos %1000 + CATS %30000
  • Target #3
  • Beam: 14O
  • Intensity: ~2e5
  • Brho = 0.519964 Tm
  • CATS2 in
  • Finger at +12 mm
  • WITH AGATA


Comment:
Start Target 3: 100 um
VAMOS is Open
AGATA Coupling
Tests VAMOS detectors settings

Stop at 2019-04-15 15:18:05.488173
Stop comment: end of modifications
Fixed, TEST, Mon Apr 15 14:13:26 2019, OttoH.V., OTHER, Hardware, N/A, HVM_ERROR 
*** hvm watcher error ***
cats2 Slot: 13 (A1835 ) Channel:1 Vmon: 567.1 V Imon: 0.66 uA Status: OVER CURRENT

Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 14:14:30 2019, Damien, Faïrouz, Nikola, Iulian, and all, VAMOS, Hardware, CH2, Vamos efficiency 128_0 
============================================================
offline/root_vamos/run_0128_0.root
============================================================
Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow
min 6121454382240790744
max 6142695442716936919
delta 21241060476146175
delta 0.899174 hours EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT
1hour==23622862570130036



=========================================================
i... HOUR: 2
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 95.3578%
IC 1 94.7752%
IC 2 93.7521%
IC 3 84.5044%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 95.8621%
IC 2 92.7939%
IC 3 90.8884%
IC 4 75.8709%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 79.3846%
DC WIRE 1 79.6441%
DC WIRE 2 77.023%
DC WIRE 3 86.1461%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 70.0453%
DCX1 70.2288%
DCX2 73.962%
DCX3 73.4596%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 55.4843%
----------------------------
Fixed, TEST, Mon Apr 15 14:46:16 2019, OttoH.V., OTHER, Hardware, N/A, HVM_ERROR 
*** hvm watcher error ***
cats2 Slot: 13 (A1835 ) Channel:1 Vmon: 568 V Imon: 0.72 uA Status: OVER CURRENT

Fixed, TEST, Mon Apr 15 15:02:06 2019, OttoH.V., OTHER, Hardware, N/A, HVM_ERROR 
*** hvm watcher error ***
cats2 Slot: 13 (A1835 ) Channel:1 Vmon: 580 V Imon: 0.38 uA Status: OVER CURRENT

Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 15:18:55 2019, A. Lemasson, VAMOS, Hardware, , Optimization of IC Shaping IC_Shapingafter_run129.png
During Run 129,
1) investigation of the trapezoidal filter of IC
2) The Conclusion is that if we reduce the shaping to 2.5 us we reduce the random line in IC vs IC (At 1e5 in VAMOS : Random Line / Peak is 18.5 % compared to 40% for shaping of 3us)
3) The 2.5us us also optimum for the resolution (oscillation of the abse line after the filter very sensitive to K, with freq of ~500Khz)

/!\ Increasing intensity during the study


Flat Top 1.07 , 320ns k+0.5M

K sigma
0.5 81 530
1.0 236 1038 0.53
1.5 161 1549 0.25
2. 215 2039 0.247
2.5 156 2554 0.1435
3. 260 3082 0.196

Changing N
320 2.5 126 2554 0.116
160 2.5 126 2554 0.116
40 2.5 130 2554 0.119

Chnging Q
2980 40 2.5 130 2554 0.1119
3300 40 2.5 134 2554 0.123

Chnging M

1070 3300 40 2.5 134 2554 0.123
500 2900 40 2.5 145 2554 0.133
750 3000 40 2.5 145 2554 0.133


-> Final Setting is
M Q N K
1070 3200 160 2.5 -> 126/2554 -> 0.116
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 15:23:58 2019, OttoRun, RUN, General, CH2, Run130 
*************************
Run : 130
*************************

Start at 2019-04-15 15:23:21.654207

Run Conditions:
  • Operator: Nikola Damien Fairouz Ksenia
  • Trigger: MUGAST + Vamos %1000 + CATS %30000
  • Target #3
  • Beam: 14O
  • Intensity: ~2e5
  • Brho = 0.519964 Tm
  • CATS2 in
  • Finger at +12 mm
  • WITH AGATA


Comment:
Start Target 3: 100 um
VAMOS is Open
AGATA Coupling
Good data

Stop at 2019-04-15 20:20:27.001928
Stop comment: Dipole of VAMOS OFF
Check TIMESTAMP

Stop at 2019-04-15 21:14:19.590092
Stop comment:
Fixed, TEST, Mon Apr 15 15:25:25 2019, OttoH.V., OTHER, Hardware, N/A, HVM_ERROR 
*** hvm watcher error ***
cats2 Slot: 13 (A1835 ) Channel:1 Vmon: 569.2 V Imon: 0.9 uA Status: OVER CURRENT

Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 15:36:48 2019, iulian Francois Fairouz Catalin, OFFLINE, General, CH2, looking for gamma proton events elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdfelab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdfelab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_ThinTar.pdfelab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_ThickTar.pdf1504b.jpg
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf -> thin target ELab protons vs Brho 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf -> thick target ELab protons vs Brho 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf -> thin target ELab protons vs Etot 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf -> thick target ELab protons vs Etot 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho 14O Vamos.


+ simulations
Fixed, TEST, Mon Apr 15 15:48:35 2019, OttoH.V., OTHER, Hardware, N/A, HVM_ERROR 
*** hvm watcher error ***
cats2 Slot: 13 (A1835 ) Channel:1 Vmon: 580.2 V Imon: 0.38 uA Status: OVER CURRENT

Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 17:05:24 2019, Valerian, OFFLINE, Software, CH2, Evolution of deE DeEEvolutionWithIntensity.png
Evolution of dEE between run 122 (8e4pps) and 129 (2.5e5pps)
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 17:10:54 2019, Valerian, OFFLINE, Software, CH2, Evolution of deE DeEEvolutionWithIntensityIC1vsIC2.png
Evolution of dEE between run 122 (8e4pps) and 130 (2.5e5pps)
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 17:17:57 2019, Beyhan +..., OTHER, General, , Spreadsheet with a list of runs up to 130 runs_list.ods
Fixed, TEST, Mon Apr 15 18:03:40 2019, OttoH.V., OTHER, Hardware, N/A, HVM_ERROR 
*** hvm watcher error ***
cats2 Slot: 13 (A1835 ) Channel:1 Vmon: 554.2 V Imon: 0.54 uA Status: OVER CURRENT

Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 18:07:43 2019, Marion Iulian Marlene Beyan Francois Marco, ONLINE, Social, CH2, Screenshots&Scalers Run 130 v1 22x
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 18:12:47 2019, Marion , BEAM, Hardware, CH2, Test: attempt to reduce the emittance and improve the VAMOS/CATS ratio 
Failed....remains at ~2.3 (CATS1/VAMOS)

ELOG Home Page