ELOG MUGAST

MUST2 SAMURAI_2018 S3-LEB-LPC SUPERNEMO MUGAST EXPAND SCALP GALATRON HiCARI VELO

MUGAST, Page 16 of 132

Not logged in

Find | Login

Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments

2636 Entries

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17 ... 130, 131, 132 Next

Mon Jun 24 13:57:46 2019

Timing change: -50 ns on CATS stop

We removed 50 ns of delay to the CATS signal used for the stop of the TOF (CATS-MUGAST/MUST) because we were at the edge of the FAG.
See the attached picture for the current situation:
Green: MUGAST/MUST2 ORD
Pink: FAG
yellow: CATS2
blue: CATS validated by FAG

Attachment 1: TimingCATSMUGAST.jpg

Fixed

e786s

Mon Jun 24 15:53:27 2019

*************************
Run : 53
*************************

Start at 2019-06-24 15:51:16.513185

Target Making (xxxx at start) with 2.5 10*4
Brho0=1.05 Tm
DC pressure 6 mbar
IC pressure 120 mbar
CATS2 inserted
******TEST OF TARGET THICKNESS*****

AGATA position +51 mm

TRIGGER :
- VAMOS %30
- MM
- MG

Stop at 2019-06-24 16:25:14.176085
Stop comment:

Fixed

e786s

Mon Jun 24 16:30:19 2019

*************************
Run : 55
*************************

Start at 2019-06-24 16:29:04.386013

CATS1 is inserted
target 700mb
Brho0=1.05 Tm
DC pressure 6 mbar
IC pressure 120 mbar
CATS2 inserted
******TEST OF TARGET THICKNESS*****

AGATA position +51 mm

TRIGGER :
- VAMOS %1000
- CATS1
- CATS2 %1000

Stop at 2019-06-24 17:38:27.010229
Stop comment:

* CATS1Y is not working --> We can't draw the CATS1 profile
* However we see scattering from CATS1 towards CATS2 in the shadowed region.
--> This means that the "thing" is most probably before CATS1

Attachment 1: Vamos13N_and_MUST3protons.png

Attachment 2: CATS1and2_raw_run55.png

Fixed

e786s

Mon Jun 24 16:50:48 2019

To plot those kinematics, there is a macros called kine.cxx

The first plot correspond to the Silicon energy in MUGAST corrected for energy loss (some improvement might be needed)
Second plot is the same but without energy loss corrections (Raw silicon energy)
Third plot is the excitation energy of 47K

Attachment 1: Kine47K.png

Fixed

e786s

Mon Jun 24 17:42:33 2019

*************************
Run : 56
*************************

Start at 2019-06-24 17:41:25.679819

CATS1 removed
target 700mb
Brho0=1.05 Tm
DC pressure 6 mbar
IC pressure 120 mbar
CATS2 inserted

AGATA position +51-25 mm

TRIGGER :
- VAMOS %1000
- CMG
- MM
- CATS2 %1000

Stop at 2019-06-25 02:55:05.207493
Stop comment: 48Ca source sample is empty. Need to be changed : probable change of beam tuning

Fixed

e786s

Mon Jun 24 20:39:54 2019

Attachment 1: scalers_run55_24062019_20h37.png

Fixed

e786s

Mon Jun 24 21:42:11 2019

The beam is fluctuating between 18 kHz and 22 kHz in VAMOS (24 to 27 kHz in CATS1)
Division on CATS1 trigger is 1000
Division on VAMOS trigger is 1000 in the GMT.

The target is stable with 6.00 K temperature, P=700mbar
We fill 4He every 5 to 5:30 hours and we use more or less 5.5 cm (i.e. 35l) for each filling.
The next bottle change is foreseen on wednesday morning.

We had 2 crashes of the target acquisition this afternoon. We think that it is due to the temperature. We added a fan and we slow down the reading of the temperature to every 12s (instead of 10s).

Fixed

e786s

Tue Jun 25 02:46:32 2019

Offline analysis run 56

Offline analysis of run 56 has been perfomed. On plots, kinematics lines and excitation energy are shown using gate on 47K in vamos. Then agata spectra is shown using gate on 47K in VAMOS un valid event in MUGAST. One can (may be) distinguish a peak at 368keV...

Attachment 1: Kine_run56.png

Attachment 2: TripleCoinc_run56.png

Fixed

e786s

Tue Jun 25 02:53:18 2019

No beam since 22h due to signal of neutron detectors. Then the diffuclty to set the beam due to thunders. Finally impossible to get back the beam because source sample is empty. No beam before tomorow 12h...

Fixed

e786s

Tue Jun 25 03:44:12 2019

Run 56 : AGATA gamma rays in coincidences with VAMOS, MUST2 and/or MUGAST

As attachment are some gamma spectra we obtained while trying several conditions on the run 056.

*Beam excitation has been investigated by gating on PID in VAMOS. Both 46Ar and 47K were selected. Excitation of 46Ar appears clearly while no clear conclusions could be drawn for the 47K.

*46Ar(3He,d)47K was investigated gating 47K in VAMOS and requiring an event in MUGAST (no specific gate could be performed on deuteron). Data size is very small but the maximum of the distribution is very close to the energy of the expected gamma ray from 47K.

*Fusion-evaporation of beam tqrget materials were investigated by requiring proton PID in MUST2. Due to the large number of possible fragments is not not possible to clearly identify the nature of the first to observed gamma ray. Yet the highest energy might correspond to a known gamma transitions in 87Zr in the case of fusion-evaporation with HAVAR window

Sylvain & Louis

Attachment 1: Run56_BeamExcitation.png

Attachment 2: run56_K47plusMugast.png

Attachment 3: run56_FusionEvaporation.png

Fixed

e786s

Tue Jun 25 08:23:58 2019

Currently there is no beam since 22h-> Thunder + no more 48Ca sample. The sample was out during the night.

The "sourcier" on-call arrived at 8h15. By talking to people in shift at the PCP they told me that more will be known ~10am-11am. Beam is expected to be back around 12am.

Fixed

e786s

Tue Jun 25 10:51:59 2019

*************************
Run : 57
*************************

Start at 2019-06-25 10:50:03.672363

152Eu source @ AGATA

Stop at 2019-06-25 14:36:40.442175
Stop comment: end ; source removed

Fixed

e786s

Tue Jun 25 11:55:12 2019

We added the correct deformation of the target thickness, and corrected for it with the angle dependance.
15 um Water
Correct beam energy
Correct target position
Run 56 only

Attachment 1: Run56_better.pdf

Fixed

e786s

Tue Jun 25 15:33:40 2019

A Lemasson

VAMOS

General

VAMOS Analysis - Brho

VAMOS Analysis :
VAMOS PID with attached SetAlias.C

Suggestion to change Brho from 1.05 to 0.95 based on the distribution of K ions to optimize acceptance on the K
ions

Attachment 1: dEE_r56.png

Attachment 2: Q_vs_Xf_All_r56.png

Attachment 3: Q_vs_Xf_K_r56.png

Attachment 4: Brho_E_K_r56.png

Attachment 5: Q_MQ_K_r56.png

Attachment 6: SetAlias.C

char cond[1000];
TTree *t1;
void SetAlias()
{
  gStyle->SetPalette(1);

  t1 = (TTree*) gROOT->FindObject("AD")
;
  t1->SetAlias("fExist_DC_Y","DC0_Y>-1500&&DC1_Y>-1500&&DC2_Y>-1500&&DC3_Y>-1500"); 
  t1->SetAlias("fExist_IC","IC[0]>0&&IC[1]>0&&IC[2]>0&&IC[3]>0"); 

  t1->SetAlias("mT","(T_FPMW_CATS2_C*-1 + 305.3 + -4*(MWTVN==8)-1*(MWTVN==9)-1*(MWTVN==10)-2.2*(MWTVN==11)-0.7*(MWTVN==12)-0.5*(MWTVN==15)-0.6*(MWTVN==16)-1.1*(MWTVN==17)+0.6*(MWTVN==18)-1*(MWTVN==6)-0.5*(MWTVN==5)-0.5*(MWTVN==4)-1.5*(MWTVN==3))*(T_FPMW_CATS1_C>10)");
  t1->SetAlias("mD","D");
  t1->SetAlias("mV","(mD)/mT");
  t1->SetAlias("mBeta","mV/29.9792");
  t1->SetAlias("mGamma","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta*mBeta)");
  
  t1->SetAlias("mM_Q","Brho/3.107/mBeta/mGamma");
  t1->SetAlias("mM","(mE)/931.5016/(mGamma-1.)");
  t1->SetAlias("mMr","mM_Q*((13.*qmq13+14.*qmq14+15.*qmq15+16.*qmq16))"); 
  t1->SetAlias("mQ","mM/mM_Q");
 
  //t1->SetAlias("mT1","(T_FPMW_HF_C*-1. + 559. + 3*(MWTVN==8))*(T_FPMW_HF_C>10)");
  t1->SetAlias("mT1","1.5+((23.7593+1.03259*MWTV)*(MWTVN==0)+(-9.53168+1.0711*MWTV)*(MWTVN==1)+(-30.486+1.11554*MWTV)*(MWTVN==2)+(-31.1261+1.11624*MWTV)*(MWTVN==3)+(-62.99829+1.1569*MWTV)*(MWTVN==4)+(-47.9021+1.13413*MWTV)*(MWTVN==5)+(-14.3957+1.08086*MWTV)*(MWTVN==6)+(-24.6655+1.1058*MWTV)*(MWTVN==7)+(60.4375+0.981809*MWTV)*(MWTVN==8)+(4.44472+1.06168*MWTV)*(MWTVN==9)+(11.408+1.04492*MWTV)*(MWTVN==10)+(56.8282+0.990287*MWTV)*(MWTVN==11)+(59.6833+0.995356*MWTV)*(MWTVN==12)+(27.6344+1.02846*MWTV)*(MWTVN==13)+(6.02794+1.06554*MWTV)*(MWTVN==14)+(20.1561+1.0342*MWTV)*(MWTVN==15)+(51.0718+1.01008*MWTV)*(MWTVN==16)+(36.5605+1.0391*MWTV)*(MWTVN==17)+(-6.01158+1.09581*MWTV)*(MWTVN==18)+(37.6143+1.00939*MWTV)*(MWTVN==19)+(29.3289+1.01291*MWTV)*(MWTVN==20) + 3*83.4*(GATCONF_MASTER==8)-0*(GATCONF_MASTER==1)-2*83.4*(GATCONF_MASTER==4))");
  t1->SetAlias("mT1","540-2*T_FPMW_CATS2_C");
  t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[0]+IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3]+IC[4])*(IC[0]>0.1&&IC[1]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1&&IC[3]>0.1)");
  //  t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3])*(IC[1]>1&&IC[2]>1&&IC[3]>1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mdE0","IC[0]*(IC[0]>1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mdE1","IC[0]*(IC[0]>1)+IC[1]*(IC[1]>1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mD1","Path");
  t1->SetAlias("mV1","mD1/(mT1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mBeta1","mV1/29.9792");
  t1->SetAlias("mGamma1","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta1*mBeta1)");
  
  t1->SetAlias("mM_Q1","Brho/3.107/mBeta1/mGamma1");
  t1->SetAlias("mM1","1.3*(mE1)/931.5016/(mGamma1-1.)");
  t1->SetAlias("mMr","mM_Q*((13.*qmq13+14.*qmq14+15.*qmq15+16.*qmq16))"); 
  t1->SetAlias("mQ1","mM1/mM_Q1");
  t1->SetAlias("ProjD","-174.*1.");
  t1->SetAlias("Xt","TMW1_X+ProjD*tan(TP_Theta/1000.)");
  t1->SetAlias("Yt","TMW1_Y+ProjD*tan(TP_Phi/1000.)");

 
  t1->SetAlias("mT2","540.5-2.*T_FPMW_CATS2_C+2.7*(MWTVN==16)+2.7*(MWTVN==15)+2.9*(MWTVN==14)+2.9*(MWTVN==13)+2.4*(MWTVN==12)+1.3*(MWTVN==11)+1.5*(MWTVN==10)+1.6*(MWTVN==9)-0.6*(MWTVN==8)+2.5*(MWTVN==7)+2.*(MWTVN==6)+1.6*(MWTVN==5)+1.1*(MWTVN==4)-0.6*(MWTVN==3)-1.2*(MWTVN==2)-4.0*(MWTVN==1)");

 //t1->SetAlias("mT2","mT1-TMWT1_MWT2_C+31");
  //  t1->SetAlias("mT2","mT1-4.83");

  t1->SetAlias("mdE2","(IC[0]+IC[1]*(IC[0]>0.1)");

 t1->SetAlias("mE2","0.85*(pow(Xf+450*tan(Tf/1000.),2)*0.0000015*IC[0] + 2.2*IC[0]+1.1*IC[1]*(IC[0]>0.1)+1.34*1.95*IC[2]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)+3.1*IC[3]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)+1.05*IC[4]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)+IC[5]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)*(IC[4]>0.1))");

 // t1->SetAlias("mE2","0.825*(2.4*IC[0]+IC[1]*(IC[0]>0.1)+1.5*1.95*IC[2]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)+3.16*IC[3]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)+1.1*IC[4]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)+IC[5]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)*(IC[4]>0.1))");

//t1->SetAlias("mE2","IC[0]+IC[1]*(IC[0]>0.1)+2*IC[2]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)+2*IC[3]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)+IC[4]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)+IC[5]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)*(IC[4]>0.1)");
   t1->SetAlias("mdE21","(IC[0]+IC[1])*(IC[0]>1&&IC[1]>0.1)");
 t1->SetAlias("mE21","(IC[0]+IC[1]+2*IC[2]+2*IC[3]+IC[4]+IC[5])*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)");
 t1->SetAlias("mD2","Path+5");
  t1->SetAlias("mV2","mD2/(mT2)");
  t1->SetAlias("mBeta2","mV2/29.9792");
  t1->SetAlias("mGamma2","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta2*mBeta2)");
  
  t1->SetAlias("mM_Q2","Brho/3.105/mBeta2/mGamma2");
  t1->SetAlias("mM2","(mE2)/931.5016/(mGamma2-1.)");
  t1->SetAlias("mQ2","mM2/mM_Q2");
  t1->SetAlias("mMrec","int(mQ2+0.5)*mM_Q2");
  
  t1->SetAlias("Gamma_from_E","mE2/14./931.5016+1");
  t1->SetAlias("Beta_from_E","sqrt(1.-1./pow(Gamma_from_E,2))");
  t1->SetAlias("Brho_from_E","14./8*3.105*Beta_from_E*Gamma_from_E");

  t1->SetAlias("mEM","(3.7*IC[0]+IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3]*(IC[2]>0.1)+18./55*IC[4]*(IC[3]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1) + 7.*IC[5]*(IC[4]>0.1&&IC[3]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1) )*(IC[0]>1&&IC[1]>0.1&&IC[2]>1&&IC[3]>1)");

}

Attachment 7: Mr_K_r56.png

Attachment 8: QMQ_K_Gates.png

Fixed

e786s

Tue Jun 25 16:58:53 2019

========================================
*************************
Run : 58
*************************

Start at 2019-06-25 16:56:44.425517

target 700mb
Brho0=0.95 Tm
DC pressure 6 mbar
IC pressure 120 mbar
CATS2 inserted

AGATA position +51-25 mm

TRIGGER :
- VAMOS %1000
- CMG
- MM
- CATS2 %1000

Beam is back
scaler_run_58.png taken at the beginning of the run.

Stop at 2019-06-26 05:02:52.980409
Stop comment:

Fixed

e786s

Tue Jun 25 18:14:38 2019

OttoRun wrote:

*************************
Run : 58
*************************

Start at 2019-06-25 16:56:44.425517

target 700mb
Brho0=0.95 Tm
DC pressure 6 mbar
IC pressure 120 mbar
CATS2 inserted

AGATA position +51-25 mm

TRIGGER :
- VAMOS %1000
- CMG
- MM
- CATS2 %1000

Beam is back
scaler_run_58.png taken at the beginning of the run.

In the CATS position spectra the central part is missing.
It is possible that the gain is two high for the actual high intensity of the beam.

Attachment 1: cats_run_58.png

Fixed

e786s

Tue Jun 25 22:20:36 2019

OttoRun wrote:

In the CATS position spectra the central part is missing (maybe for the high intensity of the beam?).
We can anyway recover the time information.

After the decrease of the high voltage of VAMOS drift chamber to avoid saturation of the signals
the BRho resolution has worsened of about 25% (see attachment). We will now increase it again (h. 22.30).

Attachment 1: BRho_run58.png

Fixed

e786s

Tue Jun 25 23:55:34 2019

Franco wrote:

OttoRun wrote:

scaler_run_58.png is taken after 7h.

Attachment 1: scaler_run_58_2.png

Fixed

e786s

Wed Jun 26 03:46:09 2019

Screenshots at 3h30 on the 26th of june during RUN 58

Attachment 1: run58_CATS_26062019_3h39.png

Attachment 2: run58_Correl_26062019_3h39.png

Attachment 3: run58_TAC_26062019_3h39.png

Attachment 4: run58_MGdETOF_26062019_3h39.png

Attachment 5: run58_MGImpact_26062019_3h39.png

Attachment 6: run58_MMImpact_26062019_3h39.png

Fixed

e786s

Wed Jun 26 03:55:20 2019

Run conversion with AGATA

To convert a run including the AGATA data, here is the procedure (Only if you know reasonably what you are doing Wink

1- Go to the AGATA Analysis computer, open a terminal and execute the following commands:

> a4
> t e786s
> cd Replay
> ./do_global_replay.sh -run ## (## is the run number you want to convert)

2- When it is finished copy the root file to the GANIL world:

> mkdir /dataganil/e786s/acquisition/root_agata/run_00##/
> cp ./run_00##/Out/Analysis/Tree_00*.root /dataganil/e786s/acquisition/root_agata/run_00##/.

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17 ... 130, 131, 132 Next

ELOG Home Page