Fixed, e744s, Tue Apr 16 08:30:58 2019, Kseniia, Dieter, AGATA, Social, CH2, AGATA count rate over the last 12 hours 
|
|
|
Fixed, , Wed Apr 17 11:25:29 2019, AGATA, AGATA, General, , AGATA background in Coinc with MUST2 with 14O beam
|
https://lxagata0.ganil.fr:8989/e744/56
http://run-control:8989/e744/56 |
|
Fixed, e793s, Sat Mar 13 07:29:56 2021, Faïrouz, Juan Lois, AGATA, Software, CD2, AGATA acquisition problem fixed by Emmanuel
|
|
|
Fixed, TEST, Thu Feb 21 18:14:48 2019, iulian, GRIT, Hardware, 3-alpha, ACQ problem run 34 3 alfa with MG1,MG3,MG4,MG5,MG7,MG9
|
Alpha source run for trapezoid detectors + anulaire detector with pedestals aligned (with HV  ) and zero suppression. Cooling at 15°C.
Thresholds at 500 keV.
On MUVI1:
1--> MG5 (150V)
2--> MG4 (95V)
3--> MG3 (160V)
4--> MG11 (60V)
On MUVI2:
5--> MG7 (120V)
6--> MG1 (140V)
7--> --
8--> --
TRIGGERS are:
GMT ch1 --> OR MUVI1
GMT ch2 --> OR MUVI2
GMT ch3 --> OR MUVI3 (nothing on it)
PROBLEM ACQ , MUVI2 has no validations (DECS). MUVI1 OK!. Looks like a problem on the catchslave actor of Narval as no events seems to pass trough
The problem was caused by the cable used to triger the GMTSlave from the FanIn FanOut. |
|
Fixed, e793s, Wed Mar 10 15:15:44 2021, Charlie, OTHER, General, , 48Ti Kinematics (additional)
|
Supplementary to Adrien's kinematic calculations of 47Ti(d,p)48Ti, we have found a paper suggesting that by far the most strongly populated state in 48Ti is at 5.65 MeV. There is also a doublet of strong states at around 4.4 MeV, and two more strongly populated states at 6.06 and 6.33 MeV.
See attachment for the full table from P. D. Barnes (1965), Phys.Rev.138.B597.
Some quick CatKin models also show that a (theoretical) state at 7 MeV in 48Ti would almost perfectly overlap with the ground state of 48K. As such, when looking at the lab energy with the g.s. of 48K normalised to 0, we could expect to see these strongly populated 48Ti states at -0.67, -0.94, -1.35 and -2.6 MeV (for 6.3, 6.06, 5.65 and 4.4 MeV, respectively).
See the attached plot for kinematics of 47K(d,p)48K @ 0 MeV and 4 MeV, as well as 47Ti(d,p)48Ti @ 0 MeV, 5.65 MeV and the theoretical 7 MeV. Additionally, see a mock-up of the expected spectra from Wilton. |
|
Fixed, e793s, Mon Mar 15 11:45:42 2021, Emmanuel, Chloé, OFFLINE, General, CD2, 48K level scheme from gg analysis
|
|
|
Fixed, e793s, Mon Mar 15 12:24:35 2021, Wilton, Emmanuel, Chloé, OFFLINE, General, CD2, 48K level scheme from gg analysis
|
| Fanstastic work, Emmanual and Chloe thanks. In a previous version, the 3522 was put in coincidence with the 143, but this has now changed? |
|
Fixed, e793s, Mon Mar 15 07:13:48 2021, Louis, OFFLINE, General, CD2, 47K(d,t)46K
|
| Preliminary analysis of the 37K(d,t)48K reaction. The 1944keV gamma transition is identified. Excitation energy was extracted using a cut on E-Tof Id in MUST2. More precise time calibration has to be performed on MUST2 to go further. |
|
Fixed, e786s, Mon Jun 24 16:50:48 2019, Valerian and Adrien, OFFLINE, Software, Cryo-3He, 3He-d kinematics
|
To plot those kinematics, there is a macros called kine.cxx
The first plot correspond to the Silicon energy in MUGAST corrected for energy loss (some improvement might be needed)
Second plot is the same but without energy loss corrections (Raw silicon energy)
Third plot is the excitation energy of 47K |
|
Fixed, e786s, Mon Jun 24 03:52:11 2019, Marlène Matthieu, RUN, General, Cryo-3He, 3He target filled with 700 mb
|
The 3He cryo target is filled with a pressure of 700 mb
The temperature on the target is 5.98K
The LHe dewar has been changed at 1 a.m. |
|
Ongoing, TEST, Tue Jan 22 18:52:23 2019, Valérian-Marlène, GRIT, General, 3-alpha, 3 alpha source run on MG10C & MG3T
|
3 alpha source (not centered)
MG10C and MG3T ON
MG10C is connected to MG5T HT and BT and seen on MUVI1 channel2 -> online name=MM2
MG3T is connected to MG3T HT and BT and seen on MUVI1 channel3 -> online name=MM3
Attached : current and bias of the detectors |
|
Fixed, e768s, Fri Jul 19 15:15:47 2019, Diego Ramos, OFFLINE, General, LiF, 19Ne identification in VAMOS together with MUGAST
|
|
|
Fixed, e768s, Fri Jul 26 19:36:03 2019, Kseniia, AGATA, General, , 19Ne gammas, current full stat
|
19Ne, VAMOS-identified
All runs from before + runs 151, 152part |
|
Fixed, e768s, Wed Jul 24 16:24:18 2019, Nicolas, OTHER, General, , 19Ne / 19F analog connections
|
|
|
Fixed, , Thu Apr 4 22:48:57 2019, mugast, GRIT, General, N/A, 16O beam tuning PCP
|
|
|
Fixed, , Sun Jul 21 22:28:11 2019, Kseniia, AGATA, General, , 15O implantation
|
Attached is the intensity distribution of 511 keV in run 119 (first image) vs run 120 (second image).
In between the two runs, beam optics was twitched.
These are the segments of crystal 02A which is near the beam pipe. Bottom is the tip of the detector, top is the
tail.
In run 119 it looks that the pillars that are near the beam line (columns 4 and 5) were seeing 511 more or less
homogeneously, which means that we are implanting 15O all over the pipe.
In run 120 looks like we still implant in the pipe, but also we implant a lot more at the target level. |
|
Fixed, e768s, Fri Jul 19 01:02:54 2019, mugast, OTHER, General, , 15O beam parameters
|
Brho manip = Brho after target - 2% = 0.556 Tm
RMN = 2821.476 Gauss
Q32 = 15.2 A
Q31 = 16.8 A
Q41 = 148.070 A
Q42 = 217.452 A
Dipole D4p = 187.632 A |
|
Fixed, , Tue Jul 16 18:51:06 2019, mugast, VAMOS, General, LiF, 15N beam optimisation
|
|
|
Fixed, e744s, Thu Apr 11 17:38:24 2019, mugast (beyhan), BEAM, General, , 14O8+ beam characteristics
|
Brho 14O8+ = 0.69186 Tm
update Adrien:
La dream team de Division (non) Opération n'arrive pas a mesurer l’énergie en sortie de CIME (WTF??!!)
Du coup ils ont mis une énergie fausse mais avec une super précision de 1.8 Mev/A dans la fiche.
#onlyatganil |
|
Fixed, e744s, Thu Apr 11 17:35:21 2019, François, BEAM, General, , 14O beam is in G1 since 17H00
|
alignment of the beam in VAMOS
intensity ~ 5x10^3 pps |
|