MUST2 SAMURAI_2018 S3-LEB-LPC SUPERNEMO MUGAST EXPAND SCALP GALATRON HiCARI VELO
  MUGAST, Page 124 of 132  Not logged in MUGAST
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
Status ExpNbr Date Author Type Category Target-Sourcedown Subject
Fixede744s Sat Apr 13 22:40:00 2019 DiegoVAMOSGeneral Saturation in the WIRES of Drift chamber due to Pile-Up
There is Saturation in the Energy of the WIRES due to the Pile-up, it is not urgent to correct it because these parameters are not needed for the reconstruction. Tomorrow morning, when stopping the run, we should change the offsets in NUMEXO in order to better allocate the amplitude of the signals.
Attachment 1: DC_Wire_saturation.png
DC_Wire_saturation.png
Fixede744s Sun Apr 14 12:32:32 2019 Beyhan, FrançoisOTHERGeneral Alarm in G2 but no beam stop
Same issue as Saturday evening.
Alarm in G2 at 12:30 due to Exogam filling with liquid nitrogen.
Beam was not stopped.Acquisition of data ongoing
Fixede744s Sun Apr 14 15:05:06 2019 A. LemassonVAMOSHardware Change of Offset in DC Numexo
  • Increasing offset to minimize saturation.
  • Reducing DC Threholds
    • DC0 436 ->355 mV
    • DC1 255 ->255 mV
    • DC2 269 ->269 mV
    • DC3 600 ->433 mV

Attachment 1: DC_NUMEXO_AfterChange.png
DC_NUMEXO_AfterChange.png
Attachment 2: DC_NUMEXO_BeforeChnage.png
DC_NUMEXO_BeforeChnage.png
Fixede744s Sun Apr 14 16:28:06 2019 FrancoisOFFLINEGeneral prediction Ep from (p,gamma)
Predictions to compare with measurement
Attachment 1: predict.jpg
predict.jpg
Attachment 2: EPCM_Brho_gamma.png
EPCM_Brho_gamma.png
   Mon Apr 15 04:34:00 2019      
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 10:07:23 2019 AntoineVAMOSHardware Brho VAMOS

During the change, Johan entered in G1 and connected a mass cable for the drift chambers.
Attachment 1: 20190415_094107.jpg
20190415_094107.jpg
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 12:33:52 2019 A. LemassonVAMOSHardware Test Run 127 : Change if IC Shaping
Try to change IC Shaping to solve the pb of Continuous Line in IC0 vs IC1
Change Shaping on all IC during run 126 Change Chan 5-12 from Filter B (3us) to Filter A (1us)
Regarding The line IC0 vs IC1 :
  • If Filter A The y =x line disapear, but the resolution deteriorate (22% compared 9 % in Filter B)
  • No clear effect of the Thresholds of
  • No clear effect of decay time on the resolution

Back to initial conditions of Run 126
Attachment 1: IC_Threshold_BeforeChange_run126.png
IC_Threshold_BeforeChange_run126.png
Attachment 2: IC_Decay_BeforeChange_run127.png
IC_Decay_BeforeChange_run127.png
Attachment 3: IC_CHange_Shaping__run127.png
IC_CHange_Shaping__run127.png
Attachment 4: IC_Shaping_Restore_run127.png
IC_Shaping_Restore_run127.png
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 15:18:55 2019 A. LemassonVAMOSHardware Optimization of IC Shaping
During Run 129,
1) investigation of the trapezoidal filter of IC
2) The Conclusion is that if we reduce the shaping to 2.5 us we reduce the random line in IC vs IC (At 1e5 in VAMOS : Random Line / Peak is 18.5 % compared to 40% for shaping of 3us)
3) The 2.5us us also optimum for the resolution (oscillation of the abse line after the filter very sensitive to K, with freq of ~500Khz)

/!\ Increasing intensity during the study


Flat Top 1.07 , 320ns k+0.5M

K sigma
0.5 81 530
1.0 236 1038 0.53
1.5 161 1549 0.25
2. 215 2039 0.247
2.5 156 2554 0.1435
3. 260 3082 0.196

Changing N
320 2.5 126 2554 0.116
160 2.5 126 2554 0.116
40 2.5 130 2554 0.119

Chnging Q
2980 40 2.5 130 2554 0.1119
3300 40 2.5 134 2554 0.123

Chnging M

1070 3300 40 2.5 134 2554 0.123
500 2900 40 2.5 145 2554 0.133
750 3000 40 2.5 145 2554 0.133


-> Final Setting is
M Q N K
1070 3200 160 2.5 -> 126/2554 -> 0.116
Attachment 1: IC_Shapingafter_run129.png
IC_Shapingafter_run129.png
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 17:17:57 2019 Beyhan +...OTHERGeneral Spreadsheet with a list of runs up to 130
Attachment 1: runs_list.ods
   Mon Apr 15 20:42:47 2019 marlene iulian beyhan valérian    
Fixed  Mon Apr 15 21:34:11 2019 mugastONLINESocial Screenshots&Scalers Run 131
Attachment 1: run131_scalers_1.png
run131_scalers_1.png
Attachment 2: run131_Vamos_1.png
run131_Vamos_1.png
Attachment 3: run131_Vamos_2.png
run131_Vamos_2.png
Attachment 4: run131_Vamos_3.png
run131_Vamos_3.png
Attachment 5: run131_Vamos_4.png
run131_Vamos_4.png
Attachment 6: run131_Vamos_5.png
run131_Vamos_5.png
Attachment 7: run131_Vamos_6.png
run131_Vamos_6.png
Attachment 8: run131_Vamos_7.png
run131_Vamos_7.png
Attachment 9: run131_Vamos_8.png
run131_Vamos_8.png
Attachment 10: run131_Vamos_9.png
run131_Vamos_9.png
Attachment 11: run131_Vamos_10.png
run131_Vamos_10.png
Attachment 12: run131_Mugast_1.png
run131_Mugast_1.png
Attachment 13: run131_Mugast_2.png
run131_Mugast_2.png
Attachment 14: run131_Mugast_3.png
run131_Mugast_3.png
Attachment 15: run131_Mugast_3.png
run131_Mugast_3.png
Attachment 16: run131_Mugast_4.png
run131_Mugast_4.png
Attachment 17: run131_Mugast_5.png
run131_Mugast_5.png
Attachment 18: run131_Mugast_6.png
run131_Mugast_6.png
Attachment 19: run131_Mugast_7.png
run131_Mugast_7.png
Attachment 20: run131_Mugast_8.png
run131_Mugast_8.png
Fixede744s Tue Apr 16 00:04:08 2019 beyhanOFFLINEGeneral ewire evolution vs beam intensity (normalized to CATS intensity)
Attachment 1: EWIRE0_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
EWIRE0_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 2: EWIRE1_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
EWIRE1_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 3: EWIRE2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
EWIRE2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 4: EWIRE3_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
EWIRE3_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Fixede744s Tue Apr 16 01:01:42 2019 beyhan, louis, serge, OFFLINEGeneral different parameters evolution as function of intensity
Attachment 1: mM2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
mM2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 2: mM_Q2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
mM_Q2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 3: mM_Q2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131_zoom.pdf
mM_Q2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131_zoom.pdf
Attachment 4: mV2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
mV2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 5: mV2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131_zoom.pdf
mV2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131_zoom.pdf
Attachment 6: T_FPMW_CATS2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
T_FPMW_CATS2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Fixede744s Tue Apr 16 11:01:04 2019 MarlèneRUNGeneral statistics on each target
Cumulated statistics (evaluated from CATS trigger) on each target is :
-target #3 : 7.547e5 (x 30000)
-target #5 : 2.02e5 (x30000)

Up to now we have 3.7 time more with target #3 than target #5.
Documentse744s Tue Apr 16 12:15:28 2019 BeyhanOTHERGeneral VAMOS settings for C run
Fixed  Tue Apr 16 12:18:46 2019 AGATAAGATAHardware ATC4 - position 13 HV tripped
- HV tripped around 12h10.
- need access to check the origin
Fixed  Tue Apr 16 13:15:48 2019 AGATAAGATAHardware ATC4 - position 13 HV tripped

set 1500 V at 13h15
Fixede744s Tue Apr 16 15:33:26 2019 beyhan, marion, dieterVAMOSGeneral VAMOS settings fo C run
Attachment 1: IMG_1643.jpg
IMG_1643.jpg
Fixede744s Tue Apr 16 23:38:04 2019 Fairouz JaromirRUNSoftware Script to watch efficiency CATS and VAMOS offline hour by hour
do

lpcgrit

in directory
/home/mugast/analysis/nptool/Projects/MUGAST

root offline/root_vamos/run_xxx.root
.x macros/EffCheck_fhjm.C
Attachment 1: EffCheck_fhjm.C
void chkef( ULong64_t low, ULong64_t high,   ULong64_t n ){
  cout<<endl;
  cout<< "=========================================================\n" ;
  cout<<"i... HOUR: "<<n<<endl; //"     "<<low<<" "<<high<<endl;
  string sep = "----------------------------\n" ;



  TTree *t1 = (TTree*) gROOT->FindObject("AD");

  TH1F * hc = new TH1F("hc","hc",2000,0.1,50);
  TH1F * ht = new TH1F("ht","ht",2000,0.1,50);


  TString cond=  Form("(((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)>=%lld)&&(((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)<%lld)",low,high);
  TString condad=Form("&&( (((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)>=%lld)&&(((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)<%lld) )",low,high);


  // cout<<cond<<endl<<condad<<endl;



      cout << "Forward (condition by before)" << endl; 
  for(int i =0; i<1;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw("T_FPMW_HF_C:T_FPMW_CATS2_C",cond.Data(),"goff"); 
      long long a=AD->GetSelectedRows();

      t1->Draw("T_FPMW_HF_C:T_FPMW_CATS2_C",Form("T_FPMW_CATS2_C<1 && T_FPMW_HF_C>2 && %s",cond.Data() ),"goff");
      long long b=AD->GetSelectedRows();

	cout << "CATS lost efficiency with resect to VAMOS" << 100.*b/a  << "%" << endl;

    }

  cout << sep ;




      cout << "Forward (condition by before)" << endl; 
  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>ht",i+1),cond.Data() ,"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>hc",i+1),Form("IC[%d]>0.1 %s",i,condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "IC " << i << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }

  cout << sep ;


  cout << "Backward  (condition by after)" << endl; 

  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>ht",i),cond.Data() ,"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>hc",i),Form("IC[%d]>0.1 %s",i+1,  condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "IC " << i+1 << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }
cout << sep ;

 cout << "DC  (condition by IC[0])" << endl; 

  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>ht"),cond.Data(),"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>hc"),Form("EWIRE_%d>100 %s",i, condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "DC WIRE " << i << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }
cout << sep ;

cout << "DC X  (condition by IC[0])" << endl; 

  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>ht"),cond.Data(),"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>hc"),Form("DC%d_X>-1500  %s",i, condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "DCX" << i << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }

cout << sep ;


cout << "Xf  (condition by IC[0])" << endl; 

      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>ht"),cond.Data() ,"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>hc"),Form("Xf>-1500 %s", condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "Xf " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;


cout << sep ;


 delete hc;
 delete ht;
}
//==============================================================end





/*
ORIGINAL NAME but  now the original code for VAMOS eff is above
 */
void EffCheck_fhjm()
{

  ULong64_t hour;
  ULong64_t LTSmin=-1;
  ULong64_t LTSmax=-1;
  ULong64_t LTS,VTS,RTS, tmin,tmax,tmp;
 
  cout<< "============================================================\n" ;
  cout<<"          "<<gFile->GetName()<<endl;
  cout<< "============================================================\n" ;


  cout<<"Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow"<<endl;
  TTree *tree= (TTree*)gDirectory->Get("AD");
  tree->SetBranchAddress("LTS",&LTS);
  tree->SetBranchAddress("VTS",&VTS);
  tree->SetBranchAddress("RTS",&RTS);
  
  
 for (int i=1;i<tree->GetEntries();i++){
   tree->GetEntry(i);
   tmp=(RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS;
   if ((LTS>0)&&(tmp>1e+14)){  //================== kill some low values?
     if ((LTSmin>tmp) || (LTSmin==-1)){
       LTSmin=tmp;
     }
     if ((LTSmax<tmp) || (LTSmax==-1)){
       LTSmax=tmp;
     }
   }
 }


 //tree->Draw("(RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS>>h(10000)","","");
 //  Long64_t LTSmin=AD->GetV1()[0];
 //  AD->Draw("RTS<<32+VTS<<16+LTS","LTS>0","goff", 1, AD->GetEntries()-1 );
 //  Long64_t LTSmax=AD->GetV1()[0];
 cout<<"min    "<<LTSmin<<" "<<endl;
 cout<<"max    "<<LTSmax<<" "<< endl;
 cout<<"delta  "<<LTSmax-LTSmin<<endl;
 cout<<"delta  "<<(LTSmax-LTSmin)/100/1e+6/3600/282162*4.3<<" hours  EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT"<<endl;
 hour=143567947269965277/6.0775;
 cout<<"1hour=="<<hour<<endl<<endl<<endl;
 //==========================================================================================
//   MAIN LOOP OVER TIME STEPS
 ULong64_t n=0;
 int hourstep=2;
 for (ULong64_t i=LTSmin; i<LTSmax; i+=hour*hourstep){
   n=n+1;
   chkef( i, i+hour , n*hourstep);
 }

  return NULL;




}
Fixed  Wed Apr 17 11:25:29 2019 AGATAAGATAGeneral AGATA background in Coinc with MUST2 with 14O beam
https://lxagata0.ganil.fr:8989/e744/56
http://run-control:8989/e744/56

ELOG Home Page