MUST2 SAMURAI_2018 S3-LEB-LPC SUPERNEMO MUGAST EXPAND SCALP GALATRON HiCARI VELO
  MUGAST, Page 124 of 132  Not logged in MUGAST
Fixed, e744s, Sat Apr 13 22:40:00 2019, Diego, VAMOS, General, , Saturation in the WIRES of Drift chamber due to Pile-Up DC_Wire_saturation.png
There is Saturation in the Energy of the WIRES due to the Pile-up, it is not urgent to correct it because these parameters are not needed for the reconstruction. Tomorrow morning, when stopping the run, we should change the offsets in NUMEXO in order to better allocate the amplitude of the signals.
Fixed, e744s, Sun Apr 14 12:32:32 2019, Beyhan, François, OTHER, General, , Alarm in G2 but no beam stop 
Same issue as Saturday evening.
Alarm in G2 at 12:30 due to Exogam filling with liquid nitrogen.
Beam was not stopped.Acquisition of data ongoing
Fixed, e744s, Sun Apr 14 15:05:06 2019, A. Lemasson, VAMOS, Hardware, , Change of Offset in DC Numexo DC_NUMEXO_AfterChange.pngDC_NUMEXO_BeforeChnage.png
  • Increasing offset to minimize saturation.
  • Reducing DC Threholds
    • DC0 436 ->355 mV
    • DC1 255 ->255 mV
    • DC2 269 ->269 mV
    • DC3 600 ->433 mV

Fixed, e744s, Sun Apr 14 16:28:06 2019, Francois, OFFLINE, General, , prediction Ep from (p,gamma) predict.jpgEPCM_Brho_gamma.png
Predictions to compare with measurement
, , Mon Apr 15 04:34:00 2019, , , , ,  
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 10:07:23 2019, Antoine, VAMOS, Hardware, , Brho VAMOS 20190415_094107.jpg

During the change, Johan entered in G1 and connected a mass cable for the drift chambers.
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 12:33:52 2019, A. Lemasson, VAMOS, Hardware, , Test Run 127 : Change if IC Shaping IC_Threshold_BeforeChange_run126.pngIC_Decay_BeforeChange_run127.pngIC_CHange_Shaping__run127.pngIC_Shaping_Restore_run127.png
Try to change IC Shaping to solve the pb of Continuous Line in IC0 vs IC1
Change Shaping on all IC during run 126 Change Chan 5-12 from Filter B (3us) to Filter A (1us)
Regarding The line IC0 vs IC1 :
  • If Filter A The y =x line disapear, but the resolution deteriorate (22% compared 9 % in Filter B)
  • No clear effect of the Thresholds of
  • No clear effect of decay time on the resolution

Back to initial conditions of Run 126
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 15:18:55 2019, A. Lemasson, VAMOS, Hardware, , Optimization of IC Shaping IC_Shapingafter_run129.png
During Run 129,
1) investigation of the trapezoidal filter of IC
2) The Conclusion is that if we reduce the shaping to 2.5 us we reduce the random line in IC vs IC (At 1e5 in VAMOS : Random Line / Peak is 18.5 % compared to 40% for shaping of 3us)
3) The 2.5us us also optimum for the resolution (oscillation of the abse line after the filter very sensitive to K, with freq of ~500Khz)

/!\ Increasing intensity during the study


Flat Top 1.07 , 320ns k+0.5M

K sigma
0.5 81 530
1.0 236 1038 0.53
1.5 161 1549 0.25
2. 215 2039 0.247
2.5 156 2554 0.1435
3. 260 3082 0.196

Changing N
320 2.5 126 2554 0.116
160 2.5 126 2554 0.116
40 2.5 130 2554 0.119

Chnging Q
2980 40 2.5 130 2554 0.1119
3300 40 2.5 134 2554 0.123

Chnging M

1070 3300 40 2.5 134 2554 0.123
500 2900 40 2.5 145 2554 0.133
750 3000 40 2.5 145 2554 0.133


-> Final Setting is
M Q N K
1070 3200 160 2.5 -> 126/2554 -> 0.116
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 17:17:57 2019, Beyhan +..., OTHER, General, , Spreadsheet with a list of runs up to 130 runs_list.ods
, , Mon Apr 15 20:42:47 2019, marlene iulian beyhan valérian, , , ,  
Fixed, , Mon Apr 15 21:34:11 2019, mugast, ONLINE, Social, , Screenshots&Scalers Run 131 20x
Fixed, e744s, Tue Apr 16 00:04:08 2019, beyhan, OFFLINE, General, , ewire evolution vs beam intensity (normalized to CATS intensity) EWIRE0_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdfEWIRE1_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdfEWIRE2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdfEWIRE3_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Fixed, e744s, Tue Apr 16 01:01:42 2019, beyhan, louis, serge, , OFFLINE, General, , different parameters evolution as function of intensity 6x
Fixed, e744s, Tue Apr 16 11:01:04 2019, Marlène, RUN, General, , statistics on each target 
Cumulated statistics (evaluated from CATS trigger) on each target is :
-target #3 : 7.547e5 (x 30000)
-target #5 : 2.02e5 (x30000)

Up to now we have 3.7 time more with target #3 than target #5.
Documents, e744s, Tue Apr 16 12:15:28 2019, Beyhan, OTHER, General, , VAMOS settings for C run 
Fixed, , Tue Apr 16 12:18:46 2019, AGATA, AGATA, Hardware, , ATC4 - position 13 HV tripped 
- HV tripped around 12h10.
- need access to check the origin
    Fixed, , Tue Apr 16 13:15:48 2019, AGATA, AGATA, Hardware, , ATC4 - position 13 HV tripped 

set 1500 V at 13h15
Fixed, e744s, Tue Apr 16 15:33:26 2019, beyhan, marion, dieter, VAMOS, General, , VAMOS settings fo C run IMG_1643.jpg
Fixed, e744s, Tue Apr 16 23:38:04 2019, Fairouz Jaromir, RUN, Software, , Script to watch efficiency CATS and VAMOS offline hour by hour EffCheck_fhjm.C
do

lpcgrit

in directory
/home/mugast/analysis/nptool/Projects/MUGAST

root offline/root_vamos/run_xxx.root
.x macros/EffCheck_fhjm.C
Fixed, , Wed Apr 17 11:25:29 2019, AGATA, AGATA, General, , AGATA background in Coinc with MUST2 with 14O beam 
https://lxagata0.ganil.fr:8989/e744/56
http://run-control:8989/e744/56

ELOG Home Page