ELOG MUGAST

Brho information 15 Oxygen beam 4.7MeV/u

Fri Jul 19 00:06:35 2019

Jenn

BEAM

General

Attachment 1: New_Doc_2019-07-18_23.58.18_1.pdf

Screenshots run 112 overnight

Fri Jul 19 03:29:58 2019

MUGAST and VAMOS screenshots run 112

Attachment 1: run_112_DC_X.png

Attachment 2: run_112_DC_Y.png

Attachment 3: run_112_DC_E.png

Attachment 4: run_112_MW.png

Attachment 5: run_112_IC.png

Attachment 6: run_112_TACS.png

Attachment 7: run_112_REC.png

Attachment 8: run_112_IC_IC.png

Attachment 9: run_112_MM_IMPACT_MATRIX.png

Attachment 10: run_112_MG_IMPACT_MATRIX.png

Attachment 11: run_112_MM_ToF.png

Attachment 12: run_112_MM_DeE.png

Attachment 13: run_112_MG_ToF.png

Attachment 14: run_112_MUGAST_TAC.png

Attachment 15: run_112_MUGAST_E_RAW.png

Attachment 16: run_112_scalers.png

Beam intensity and profile check

Mon Jul 29 01:27:59 2019

Run number 156: 15-O beam
beam intensity 8.8e6
OR Vamos ~ 106

Attachment 1: photo_2019-07-29_00-27-36.jpg

Mon Jul 15 18:05:14 2019

Run7 - TAC calibration

*************************
Run : 7
*************************

Start at 2019-07-15 18:04:51.105052

TAC Time calibrator

range 2.56 um
period 20ns

TACs range settings:
1. VAMOS - AGATA -> 500 ns
2. FAG - HF -> 200 ns
3. CATAS1 - HF -> 500 ns
4. VAMOS - HF -> 2 us
5. MUGAST - VAMOS -> 2 us
6. MUST2 - AGATA -> 2 us
7. MUST2 - HF -> 2 us
8. BAF2 - HF -> 1 us
9. AGATA - HF -> 200 ns

Stop at 2019-07-15 18:16:11.458928
Stop comment: Finish 1st time calibration. Changing ranges now

Mon Jul 15 18:17:49 2019

Run8 - TAC calibrations

*************************
Run : 8
*************************

Start at 2019-07-15 18:17:21.942994

TAC Time calibrator

range 2.56 um

10 ns period

Mon Jul 15 18:39:03 2019

Run9 - TAC calibration

*************************
Run : 9
*************************

Start at 2019-07-15 18:38:59.133455

TAC Time calibrator

range 2.56 um

10 ns period

Stop at 2019-07-15 19:04:03.255467
Stop comment: type your message here

Stop at 2019-07-15 19:18:09.593144
Stop comment: end of tac time calibration

Online Spectra run 256 @2h30 am 06/04 (for reference)

Sat Apr 6 02:48:39 2019

Iulian Ruxandra

RUN

Software

The online spectra (for reference)
No timing on Mg3 & Mg4 side X. Those correspond with the masked channels on the Muvi1

Attachment 1: Run_256_Impact_Matrix.png

Attachment 2: Run_256_Must_X_side.png

Attachment 3: Run_256_TACs.png

Attachment 4: Run_256_Must_Y_side.png

Attachment 5: Run_256_Must_X_side.png

Attachment 6: Run_256_Impact_Matrix.png

Attachment 7: Run_256_Vamos_1.png

Attachment 8: Run_256_Vamos_2.png

Attachment 9: Run_256_Vamos_3.png

Attachment 10: Run_256_Vamos_4.png

Attachment 11: Run_256_Vamos_5.png

Online Scalers run 256 @2h30 am 06/04 for reference

Sat Apr 6 02:52:51 2019

Iulian Ruxandra

RUN

Software

Attachment 1: Run_256_Scaler1.png

Attachment 2: Run_256_Scaler2.png

Attachment 3: Run_256_Scaler3.png

Attachment 4: Run_256_Scaler4.png

New Kinematics plots (4h of stats)

Sat Apr 6 03:22:30 2019

Iulian Ruxandra

RUN

Software

More statistics on the script written by Adrian and Valerian (first image)

Second image is a comparison between the excited states produced between 90-130 deg and 130-180 deg. Effects of angular distribution?

the kinematic line seen in the Elab vs Theta at backward angles can be observed in figure 3. Are those protons?

Attachment 1: Kine256_0-256_3.pdf

Attachment 2: Kine256_0-256_3_comparison.pdf

Attachment 3: Elab_vs_ThetaLab_backward.pdf

first calculation ECM ThetaCM for gamma-P emission

Sun Apr 14 03:30:28 2019

Attachment 1: first_gammaP_rec.pdf

Attachment 2: Alias_iul.C

TTree *tTmp;
void SetAlias()
{
  tTmp = (TTree*) gROOT->FindObject("PhysicsTree");
  //  tTmp->SetAlias("mp","1.00866491582");
  // tTmp->SetAlias("m14o","14.008596706");
  // tTmp->SetAlias("Elab14o","71.");//MeV
  // tTmp->SetAlias("Erel14o","1.00866491582*14.008596706/(1.00866491582+14.008596706)/(1.00866491582+14.008596706)*71."); 
  tTmp->SetAlias("EPCM","ELab+4.4485492-2*sqrt(ELab*4.4485492)*cos(ThetaLab/57.4)");
  tTmp->SetAlias("ThetaPCM","57.4*(3.14-acos((EPCM+4.4485492-ELab)/2./sqrt(EPCM*4.4485492)))");


  //tTmp->SetAlias("EPCM","ELab+Erel14o-2*sqrt(ELab*Erel14o)*cos(ThetaLab)");
  //tTmp->SetAlias("ThetaPCM","57.4*(3.14-atan((EPCM+Erel14o-ELab)/2./sqrt(EPCM*Erel14o)))");


}

Change target CH2 to no target

Thu Apr 11 19:19:21 2019

Target hole is now removed -> No target

rTarget change and Brho change VAMOS before run 125 for off resonance measurement

Sun Apr 14 16:55:57 2019

16:30 start run 124
setting brho for next run
brho old = 0.519964
finger old = +12 mm

brho new = 0.550875
finger new = +16 mm

16:55 start run 125 with thinner CH2 target #5 for off-resonance measurement

Scalers - U2M23 must be the finger

Sat Apr 13 12:39:02 2019

Iulian ->Jaromir update

ONLINE

Hardware

N/A

Looks like U2M_23 is in fact the beam dump (plastic finger).

This day scalers were looked at;
Tested OR_VAMOS + U2M23 = CATS2

the discrepancy is on level of 1-2% for the actual rate,
or approx 500-1000cps for TOTALS of the scalers.

Attachment 1: run122_doigt_is_u2m23.png

GMT channel4 corresponds to VAMOS now

TEST

Fri Mar 29 10:00:52 2019

Voie4 GMT = trigger Vamos

Sat Apr 13 10:32:59 2019

Screenshots run 122 v3

Is missing the scalers