Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
Text |
 |
Fixed | e768s |
Tue Jul 23 19:21:50 2019 |
Nicolas | OTHER | Social | N/A | Waiting end of canicule (and beam!) | |
|
Fixed | e768s |
Wed Jul 24 16:24:18 2019 |
Nicolas | OTHER | General | | 19Ne / 19F analog connections | |
|
Fixed | e768s |
Sun Jul 28 16:23:48 2019 |
Nicolas | RUN | General | | Update on possible restart | Same situation as before lunch, the beam is
still in C0 and not yet in CSS1. We may have
beam in late evening.... |
|
Ongoing | e768s |
Sun Jul 28 19:58:57 2019 |
Nicolas | RUN | General | | Update on possible restart | Beam is now at the exit of CSS2 though We
may have beam around midnight....[/quote] |
|
Fixed | e768s |
Sun Jul 28 21:59:43 2019 |
Nicolas | RUN | General | | Update on possible restart | Beam is in G1 with 3e6 pps. PCP will optimize
for about 1-1,5h before we take the beam. |
|
Fixed | e768s |
Tue Jul 30 15:47:46 2019 |
Nicolas | BEAM | General | | Beam stopped since 11h30 | vacuum problem in CSS1 |
|
Pinned | e775s |
Thu Feb 27 12:44:37 2020 |
Nicolas | OFFLINE | Software | | How to produce control spectra | In /home/mugast/analysis/nptool/Projects/MUGAST/e775s
directory there is the Control.C macro which
draws: Ex, Ex vs Eg and Elab vs thetalab |
|
Pinned | e775s |
Thu Feb 27 16:35:26 2020 |
Nicolas | OFFLINE | Software | | How to produce control spectra | [quote="Nicolas"]In /home/mugast/analysis/nptool/Projects/MUGAST/e775s
directory there is the Control.C macro which
draws: Ex, Ex vs Eg and Elab vs thetalab |
|
Fixed | e793s |
Sun Mar 14 18:13:28 2021 |
Miguel, Wilton, Nishu, Dieter, Ablaihan | RUN | General | CD2 | run62 screenshots at 18h14 | |
10x |
Fixed | e793s |
Sun Mar 14 20:11:17 2021 |
Miguel, Wilton, Nishu, Dieter, Ablaihan | RUN | General | CD2 | run62 screenshots at 20h00 | Beam progressively down from 5 to 4 10^5.
Went to PCP, they were losing intensity in
the primary beam, from 500 to 400 nA. Working |
10x |
Fixed | e793s |
Sun Mar 14 22:01:04 2021 |
Miguel, Wilton, Ablaihan,nishu | RUN | General | CD2 | summary of run 62@22:00hrs | |
9x |
Fixed | e793s |
Sun Mar 14 17:16:01 2021 |
Miguel, Wilton, Ablaihan | BEAM | Hardware | CD2 | Beam went down for a couple of minutes at 17:13. Now it is ok, screenshot attached. | Beam went up to 2x10^6 pps in CATS.
Then it went down to 0 for a couple of minutes |
|
Fixed | e768s |
Tue Jul 23 14:33:03 2019 |
Marlène, Yorick, Faïrouz & Nicolas | BEAM | General | | Cheking beam transmission from G1 profiler to VAMOS | Goal:
Estimate beam transmission from profiler
to VAMOS (FP)
|
  |
Fixed | e768s |
Mon Jul 15 19:59:30 2019 |
Marlène, Nicolas, Serge | RUN | General | N/A | Run10 - fsc | *************************
[SIZE=3][B]Run : 10[/B][/SIZE]
*************************
|
|
Fixed | e768s |
Mon Jul 15 20:18:07 2019 |
Marlène, Nicolas, Serge | RUN | General | N/A | Run13 - fsc | *************************
[SIZE=3][B]Run : 13[/B][/SIZE]
*************************
|
|
Fixed | TEST |
Wed Feb 12 16:24:52 2020 |
Marlène, Freddy & Franco | MUST2 | Hardware | | Modifications on the electronic scheme | We cleaned the electronic scheme.
Now the HF CLEAN VAMOS is taken directly
from VAMOS and not re-cleaned by us.
|
|
Fixed | e768s |
Mon Jul 22 11:42:22 2019 |
Marlène, François D, Franck | BEAM | General | LiF | Beam profile and intensity | Intensity = 1.8e7 pps
Slight shifts in x and y compared to this |
|
Fixed | e768s |
Mon Jul 22 16:54:33 2019 |
Marlène, Franck, François & Nicolas | BEAM | General | | Cheking beam transmission from G1 profiler to VAMOS | Goal:
Estimate beam transmission from profiler
to VAMOS (FP)
|
|
Fixed | e768s |
Mon Jul 22 17:07:39 2019 |
Marlène, Franck, François & Nicolas | BEAM | General | | Profiler conditions for measuring beam intensity | We checked that the measured beam intensity
(present case 1.5e7 pps) is independent on
the voltage on the profiler. Values from |
|
Fixed | e768s |
Fri Jul 26 02:27:48 2019 |
Marlène, Faïrouz, Franck, Bertrand, Sylvain, Diego, Nicolas | BEAM | General | | G1 profiler efficiency | G1 profiler efficiency was checked against
CATS1 for two beam intensities. Agreement
between the two measurements is within 20%
|
|