Fixed, com2019, Sat Apr 6 06:24:04 2019, mugast, RUN, Software, CD2, new data 5more statistics° 
|
|
|
Fixed, e768s, Wed Jul 17 01:08:03 2019, mugast, VAMOS, General, LiF, new beam settings
|
The last values Q32=21.0, Q31=22.8
With these new optimzed values, we have:
Std dev-x=6.147
Std dev y=13.29
Beam intensity=10⁴ pps, no masque mobile |
|
Fixed, e744s, Sat Apr 13 17:31:54 2019, mugast, VAMOS, Hardware, , new Threshold on DC1 Channel 127
|
Channel 127 of DC1 had a reduction of gain from yesterday, I corrected the gain by calibration and I reduced the threshold from 2114 to 2083 in order to reach the same low level.
(We can still see the lower gain in the online because the watcher is not reloaded, but it is ok in the root files) |
|
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 15:36:48 2019, iulian Francois Fairouz Catalin, OFFLINE, General, CH2, looking for gamma proton events
|
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf -> thin target ELab protons vs Brho 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf -> thick target ELab protons vs Brho 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf -> thin target ELab protons vs Etot 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf -> thick target ELab protons vs Etot 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho 14O Vamos.
+ simulations |
|
Fixed, e744s, Fri Apr 12 13:53:56 2019, diego, OTHER, General, , intervention
|
TAC FPMW_HF in VAMOS was still out of range for MUGAST physics
We increased the range from 1us to 2us and applied a delay of 200 ns to the stop of the TAC. |
|
Fixed, TEST, Mon Feb 24 10:26:29 2020, Marlène, GRIT, General, , infos
|
We have changed the range of the TAC FAG-HF to 500ns (it was 200 ns before)
there is no delay on the STOP of MUVI, it is directly the HF clean.
The inspection lines of MUVI1 are sent to vamos acquisition room. |
|
Fixed, e768s, Fri Jul 19 13:24:01 2019, mugast, OFFLINE, General, LiF, g-ray spectrum (run 112) requiring 19Ne in VAMOS
|
|
|
Fixed, e744s, Sat Apr 13 17:03:14 2019, Jérémie & François, OFFLINE, General, , first gamma spectrum
|
| After a few hours run. |
|
Fixed, e744s, Sun Apr 14 03:30:28 2019, Iulian Iulia, OFFLINE, Social, CH2, first calculation ECM ThetaCM for gamma-P emission
|
|
|
Fixed, e768s, Sat Jul 27 11:02:13 2019, mugast, ONLINE, General, , figures run 152 18x
|
|
|
Fixed, e744s, Tue Apr 16 00:04:08 2019, beyhan, OFFLINE, General, , ewire evolution vs beam intensity (normalized to CATS intensity)
|
|
|
Fixed, , Mon Apr 8 07:54:53 2019, iulian, MUST2, Hardware, , end alpha contamination run
|
Problem M3 EY , moving piedestal... See below
Alfa spectra have changed, no longer continuous excepting partially MM2. |
|
Fixed, e793s, Fri Mar 12 03:57:46 2021, Taras, Nishu, Chloe, Charlie, VAMOS, General, CD2, dipole issue fixed
|
the alimentation on dipole (G1.G.D4.P) was turned off,
the value was resetted(322.6) and works fine now.
cour: 323.5 A
tens. 39.21 V |
|
Fixed, e744s, Tue Apr 16 01:01:42 2019, beyhan, louis, serge, , OFFLINE, General, , different parameters evolution as function of intensity 6x
|
|
|
Fixed, e768s, Sat Jul 27 21:12:47 2019, teodora & beyhan, OTHER, Hardware, , cout rate with no beam & water level check 6x
|
Around 9 pm, we observed an average count rate of 30kHz on the "or agata" scaler rates panel of GECO. The other count rates were ok.
In the agata acquisition monitoring the rate was given about 8k. one of the detector was showing a rate in red.
We decided to stop : (1) to check the rates with no beam, (2) to check the water level in collection boxes and (3) the beam intensity.
Conclusions :
- The agata rate with no beam is about 4.5kHz. The rest seems ok.
- The level of water in the collection boxes did not change since 3 pm. So it should be ok for the night (see pictures)
- The beam profile and intensity are similar to what we got before
- The rate after we got the beam looks normal now.
So everything is going well 
PS : there is also a piscture about the water collection tank to empty the boxes if needed
|
|
Fixed, e793s, Tue Mar 16 04:06:46 2021, Lynda, Cyril, Nishu, AGATA, General, CD2, counting rates AGATA
|
crystal 12B counting rate is too low ~ 5 / s compared to an average of ~ 80/s - 100/ s for the other crystals
and 05B counting rate is too high from time to time reaching ~2000/s
but every thing is "green" ?!
Issue solved By Emmanuel Clement at 10h45 |
|
Fixed, com2019, Sat Apr 6 13:10:11 2019, mugast, VAMOS, Hardware, CD2, check in VAMOS HV
|
| target drift chamber HV checked. They are OK |
|
Fixed, e744s, Thu Apr 11 17:37:29 2019, Valérian, Chloé and François, OTHER, Hardware, , changes in the electronic
|
Changes made in the electronic during the break between 14N and 14O
1) T_VAMOS-CATS1
it was not connected. We added 500 ns delay in CATS1 (CATS2 in reality) (48+150ns before)
2) T_CATS1_HF
range changed from 2µs to 200 ns |
|
Fixed, e744s, Thu Apr 11 18:08:12 2019, Marlène, OTHER, Hardware, , changes in the electronic
|
| Valérian, Chloé and François wrote: | Changes made in the electronic during the break between 14N and 14O
1) T_VAMOS-CATS1
it was not connected. We added 500 ns delay in CATS1
2) T_CATS1_HF
range changed from 2µs to 200 ns |
T_VAMOS-CATS1 is now connected in T_CATS1_CATS2 as posted this night. We have tried to add 500ns more delay (800ns in total) to CATS and it did not work, so we suspected the TAC or ADC. This is why we inverted T_VAMOS-CATS1 with T_CATS1_CATS2. For this TAC, CATS is the START (and is not delayed by 500ns). |
|
Fixed, e744s, Mon Apr 15 09:59:32 2019, Marlène, RUN, General, CH2, change thresholds in DSSD MUST2 and suppression CsI
|
From RUN126
change of MUST2 DSSD thresholds : thresholds are 583 keV now
change of CsI suppression : before it was suppressed up to 8210 now it is 8200 |
|