| Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
| Fixed | e793s |
Thu Mar 11 03:37:45 2021 |
Louis | OFFLINE | General | CD2 | Offline analyis run 53 |
1) Some angular distribution were extracted (without any efficiency corrections) with gate on Ex btw 0 and 2 MeV (where p orbitals are populated) and btw 2 and 4 MeV (where f orbitals are populated). More counts are observed btw 110 and 120 degrees in Lab angle with the 0-2MeV gate compared to the 2-4MeV gate which is expected from the AWBA calculus. Kinematic cuts the large angles at high excitation energies. Geometrical efficiency is needed to compare this angular range. Looks like we well distinguish L=1 and L=3 transfers.
2) Some gamma spectra obtained with Ex gate btw -1 and 1, 1 and 3, 3 and 5 MeV.
3) Some strange horizontal lines are observed in the E-TOF id in MUST2. The spectra was obtained with gate on the promt signal in vamos so it can not be the beam intercepting directly must2...
4) the Ex vs Eg matrix |
| Attachment 1: AngDistrib.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: Eg_Ex.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: ETofMM.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: ExEg.png
|
|
| Attachment 5: Ex_Theta.png
|
|
| Fixed | |
Fri Jul 19 11:46:51 2019 |
iulian | OFFLINE | General | LiF | Offline 112 |
Egamma vs M/Q*9 to check who is 19Ne
Ex in 19Ne all Mugast
Ex vs Egamma for 19Ne
Kinematics Lines drawn over Elab vs Tlab for 19Ne |
| Attachment 1: run112_Egamma_mM_Q.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: run113_Ex_19Ne.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: run112_Ex_Egamma_19Ne.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: run112_KinLines_19Ne.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Fri Apr 26 11:29:02 2019 |
Valerian | OTHER | Software | N/A | Notes about the electronic |
While doing the electronic scheme, I saw that the Inspection line was inducing a bad signal in the coincidence module between fag and CATS1. See joined image.
Also, I broke a cable between CATS1 Fifo and the delay box, the delay is now 2 ns longer. |
| Attachment 1: Signal_oscilloscope_coinc_module.jpeg
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 10 06:45:53 2019 |
François | BEAM | Social | | No beam yet |
| They are about to align the beam from the cyclotron CIME to the area G1. |
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 10 09:05:33 2019 |
François | BEAM | Social | | No beam in G1 yet. |
| The beam is at the entrance of G1. |
| Fixed | e793s |
Thu Mar 11 23:38:02 2021 |
Faïrouz, Franco | RUN | General | CD2 | No beam at 23h35 for a duration of ~1à mn |
| The beam operators took the beam at 23h35 for 10 mn. |
| Attachment 1: run56_Scalers_23h44.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 17 03:03:15 2019 |
mugast | BEAM | General | CH2 | No beam |
No beam since 02:30
HV of C0 tripping all the time, pcp call someone to fix it |
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 17 05:14:15 2019 |
mugast | BEAM | General | CH2 | No beam |
| mugast wrote: | No beam since 02:30
HV of C0 tripping all the time, pcp call someone to fix it |
We recover the beam at 05:05 with oscillations |
| Fixed | TEST |
Mon Mar 4 12:28:26 2019 |
Valerian and Iulian | MUST2 | General | 3-alpha | No DECS and acq error run 47-48-49. Das Saved after problem fixed |
Fixed. Solution:
1) CENTRUM not configured on GENTRUM Master
2) GMT matrix on GMT3 (2nd slave) was all 0
DAS saved after solution found |
| Attachment 1: run49_error_acq.png
|
|
| Fixed | e768s |
Sat Jul 20 01:02:10 2019 |
Serge & Franco | OTHER | General | | Night shift beam & resync |
timeline of run 116
00:xx resync Agata #13C
00:57 lost beam, back at full intensity at 01:12
01:30 lost beam, back at full intensity at 01:45
01:37 FP_CATS5 tripped, reset
01:43 resync Agata #13C
02:04 resync Agata #13C
02:20 lost beam, back at full intensity at 02:30
02:36 resync Agata #13C
03:45 Vamos rate down to 900 pps, checked that intensity on profiler is 1.1e7 so decided to continue
05:58 resync Agata #13C
06:55 Vamos rate at 1400 pps but diamond is decreasing since several hours: we had 17500 counts at midnight and now only 7500.
Checked beam rate on profiler and found 1.8e7 so indeed it is the diamond efficiency that is going down steeply |
| Fixed | e744s |
Sun Apr 14 15:26:48 2019 |
Nikola Dieter Nicolas Beyhan Kseniia | VAMOS | Hardware | CH2 | New thresholds values for DC0 and DC3 |
Thresholds are lowered from 4V to 2V for DC0
Thresholds are lowered from 6V to 4V for DC3 |
| Fixed | e793s |
Mon Mar 15 10:08:27 2021 |
Taras, cyril, Léo | RUN | General | CD2 | New run scalers (beam stopped) |
|
| Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2021-03-15_10-08-59.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Sat Apr 13 13:42:22 2019 |
Marion, Kseniia, Dieter, Didier, Guiseppe, IuliaH | RUN | General | CH2 | New run 122...1 generated after 4G on disk |
|
| Ongoing | e793s |
Wed Mar 17 15:17:39 2021 |
Emmanuel C | OFFLINE | General | | New gamma gamma analysis |
The level scheme is based on coherent check of
1- gamma gamma
2- gamma gated by Ex
3- Ex gated by gamma |
| Attachment 1: 48K.pdf
|
|
| Fixed | TEST |
Mon Feb 10 18:42:23 2020 |
Franco&Marlène | GRIT | Hardware | | New MUGAST detectors MG2 MG6 |
MG2 and MG6 have been mounted in the chamber.
MG2 reference number is 3227_10 thickness=468um
MG6 3227_7 thickness=473um
Nominal depletion =35V |
| Fixed | com2019 |
Sat Apr 6 03:22:30 2019 |
Iulian Ruxandra | RUN | Software | | New Kinematics plots (4h of stats) |
More statistics on the script written by Adrian and Valerian (first image)
Second image is a comparison between the excited states produced between 90-130 deg and 130-180 deg. Effects of angular distribution?
the kinematic line seen in the Elab vs Theta at backward angles can be observed in figure 3. Are those protons? |
| Attachment 1: Kine256_0-256_3.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 2: Kine256_0-256_3_comparison.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 3: Elab_vs_ThetaLab_backward.pdf
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 17 13:48:25 2019 |
Valerian and Diego | RUN | Software | CH2 | New Dalitz plot with good angles in vamos |
The previous Dalitz plot was wrong as I was using the angle from vamos as polar angles.
Now that it is corrected we see that this decay seems sequential. |
| Attachment 1: DalitzGoodAngle.png
|
|
| Fixed | e786s |
Tue Jun 25 02:53:18 2019 |
Sylvain, Louis | BEAM | General | Cryo-3He | NO BEAM |
| No beam since 22h due to signal of neutron detectors. Then the diffuclty to set the beam due to thunders. Finally impossible to get back the beam because source sample is empty. No beam before tomorow 12h... |
| Fixed | e793s |
Wed Mar 17 19:19:05 2021 |
Franco | OFFLINE | General | CD2 | Mugast detectors disaligned in Ex |
The Ex distributions gated on the different MG detectors show large differences, up to 500 keV. In the attached figure I show as an example the comparison between two nearby detectors, MG3 and MG4.
I tried a rough alignment of the Ex by shifting it manually and setting the first main peak at Ex=0 (essentially taking MG5 as the reference, since his first peak is at 0).
These are the shifts applied:
MG1 -> -580 keV
MG2 -> -280 keV
MG3 -> -550 keV
MG4 -> -100 keV
MG5 -> 0 keV
MG7 -> -400 keV
The resulting Ex distribution is plotted in the second attachment, compared with the original below. The resolution of the first peak (assuming there's a single level there) is 420 keV FWHM.
I think it would be worth having the position of the MUGAST detectors re-measured. |
| Attachment 1: detectors_disalignment_Ex.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: Ex_aligned_vs_unaligned.png
|
|
| Fixed | TEST |
Thu Mar 12 14:47:59 2020 |
Marlène & Franco | GRIT | Hardware | N/A | Moving MG9 square to MUVI2 |
- Since we are not using MG6 anymore (card burnt), we replaced it with MG9 on slot 3 of MUVI2. MUVI4 is now unused. We changed the actions parameters accordingly.
- We cannot run the time calibration for MG9 because the pulser does not go through neither on X nor on Y. |