| Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 14:14:30 2019 |
Damien, Faïrouz, Nikola, Iulian, and all | VAMOS | Hardware | CH2 | Vamos efficiency 128_0 |
============================================================
offline/root_vamos/run_0128_0.root
============================================================
Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow
min 6121454382240790744
max 6142695442716936919
delta 21241060476146175
delta 0.899174 hours EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT
1hour==23622862570130036
=========================================================
i... HOUR: 2
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 95.3578%
IC 1 94.7752%
IC 2 93.7521%
IC 3 84.5044%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 95.8621%
IC 2 92.7939%
IC 3 90.8884%
IC 4 75.8709%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 79.3846%
DC WIRE 1 79.6441%
DC WIRE 2 77.023%
DC WIRE 3 86.1461%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 70.0453%
DCX1 70.2288%
DCX2 73.962%
DCX3 73.4596%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 55.4843%
---------------------------- |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 15:18:55 2019 |
A. Lemasson | VAMOS | Hardware | | Optimization of IC Shaping |
During Run 129,
1) investigation of the trapezoidal filter of IC
2) The Conclusion is that if we reduce the shaping to 2.5 us we reduce the random line in IC vs IC (At 1e5 in VAMOS : Random Line / Peak is 18.5 % compared to 40% for shaping of 3us)
3) The 2.5us us also optimum for the resolution (oscillation of the abse line after the filter very sensitive to K, with freq of ~500Khz)
/!\ Increasing intensity during the study
Flat Top 1.07 , 320ns k+0.5M
K sigma
0.5 81 530
1.0 236 1038 0.53
1.5 161 1549 0.25
2. 215 2039 0.247
2.5 156 2554 0.1435
3. 260 3082 0.196
Changing N
320 2.5 126 2554 0.116
160 2.5 126 2554 0.116
40 2.5 130 2554 0.119
Chnging Q
2980 40 2.5 130 2554 0.1119
3300 40 2.5 134 2554 0.123
Chnging M
1070 3300 40 2.5 134 2554 0.123
500 2900 40 2.5 145 2554 0.133
750 3000 40 2.5 145 2554 0.133
-> Final Setting is
M Q N K
1070 3200 160 2.5 -> 126/2554 -> 0.116 |
| Attachment 1: IC_Shapingafter_run129.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 15:23:58 2019 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CH2 | Run130 |
*************************
Run : 130
*************************
Start at 2019-04-15 15:23:21.654207
Run Conditions:
- Operator: Nikola Damien Fairouz Ksenia
- Trigger: MUGAST + Vamos %1000 + CATS %30000
- Target #3
- Beam: 14O
- Intensity: ~2e5
- Brho = 0.519964 Tm
- CATS2 in
- Finger at +12 mm
- WITH AGATA
Comment:
Start Target 3: 100 um
VAMOS is Open
AGATA Coupling
Good data
Stop at 2019-04-15 20:20:27.001928
Stop comment: Dipole of VAMOS OFF
Check TIMESTAMP
Stop at 2019-04-15 21:14:19.590092
Stop comment: |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 15:36:48 2019 |
iulian Francois Fairouz Catalin | OFFLINE | General | CH2 | looking for gamma proton events |
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf -> thin target ELab protons vs Brho 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf -> thick target ELab protons vs Brho 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf -> thin target ELab protons vs Etot 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho Vamos.
elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf -> thick target ELab protons vs Etot 14O in M/Q for protons mult 1 in MUGAST. Orange are the same, but conditioned by Theta Lab protons vs Brho 14O Vamos.
+ simulations |
| Attachment 1: elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThinTar.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 2: elab_Brho_gamma_thetaCond_int_ThickTar.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 3: elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_ThinTar.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 4: elab_Etot_gamma_thetaCond_ThickTar.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 5: 1504b.jpg
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 17:05:24 2019 |
Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | Evolution of deE |
| Evolution of dEE between run 122 (8e4pps) and 129 (2.5e5pps) |
| Attachment 1: DeEEvolutionWithIntensity.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 17:10:54 2019 |
Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | Evolution of deE |
| Evolution of dEE between run 122 (8e4pps) and 130 (2.5e5pps) |
| Attachment 1: DeEEvolutionWithIntensityIC1vsIC2.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 17:17:57 2019 |
Beyhan +... | OTHER | General | | Spreadsheet with a list of runs up to 130 |
|
| Attachment 1: runs_list.ods
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 18:07:43 2019 |
Marion Iulian Marlene Beyan Francois Marco | ONLINE | Social | CH2 | Screenshots&Scalers Run 130 v1 |
|
| Attachment 1: run130_1_scalers_1.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: run130_1_MUGAST_1_1.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: run130_1_MUGAST_1_2.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: run130_1_MUGAST_1_3.png
|
|
| Attachment 5: run130_1_MUGAST_1_4.png
|
|
| Attachment 6: run130_1_MUGAST_1_5.png
|
|
| Attachment 7: run130_1_MUGAST_1_6.png
|
|
| Attachment 8: run130_1_MUGAST_1_7.png
|
|
| Attachment 9: run130_1_MUGAST_1_8.png
|
|
| Attachment 10: run130_1_VAMOS_1_1ZOOM.png
|
|
| Attachment 11: run130_1_VAMOS_1_1.png
|
|
| Attachment 12: run130_1_VAMOS_1_2.png
|
|
| Attachment 13: run130_1_VAMOS_1_3.png
|
|
| Attachment 14: run130_1_VAMOS_1_4.png
|
|
| Attachment 15: run130_1_VAMOS_1_5.png
|
|
| Attachment 16: run130_1_VAMOS_1_6.png
|
|
| Attachment 17: run130_1_VAMOS_1_7.png
|
|
| Attachment 18: run130_1_VAMOS_1_8.png
|
|
| Attachment 19: run130_1_VAMOS_1_9.png
|
|
| Attachment 20: run130_1_VAMOS_1_10.png
|
|
| Attachment 21: run130_1_VAMOS_1_11.png
|
|
| Attachment 22: run130_1_VAMOS_1_12.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 18:12:47 2019 |
Marion | BEAM | Hardware | CH2 | Test: attempt to reduce the emittance and improve the VAMOS/CATS ratio |
| Failed....remains at ~2.3 (CATS1/VAMOS) |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 18:23:57 2019 |
Marion | VAMOS | Hardware | CH2 | Suggestion to follow the VAMOS Ewire as a function of time |
| A shift in the peak position of the DC_EWIRE page could allow to follow the drift chamber wire ageing. |
| Attachment 1: run130_1_VAMOS_1_1ZOOM.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 20:43:37 2019 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CH2 | Run131 |
*************************
Run : 131
*************************
Start at 2019-04-15 20:41 654207
Run Conditions:
- Operator: Marlène Iulian Beyhan Valérian
- Trigger: MUGAST + Vamos %1000 + CATS %30000
- Target #3
- Beam: 14O
- Intensity: 2e4
- Brho = 0.519964 Tm
- CATS2 in
- Finger at moved +13 mm
- WITH AGATA
Comment:
Start Target 3: 100 um
VAMOS is Open
AGATA Coupling
Good data
Restart after stop of VAMOS DIPOLE (raz of errors on the "alim" in the basement and put back values) |
| Attachment 1: run131_scaler.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 21:21:46 2019 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CH2 | Run132 |
*************************
Run : 132
*************************
Start at 2019-04-15 21:20:16.339760
*************************
Run : 132
*************************
Start at 2019-04-15 15:23:21.654207
Run Conditions:
Operator: Marco, Simon, Valerian, Beyhan, Jaromir, iulian
Trigger: MUGAST + Vamos %1000 + CATS %30000
Target #3
Beam: 14O
Intensity: ~2e5
Brho = 0.519964 Tm
CATS2 in
Finger at +13 mm
WITH AGATA
Comment:
Stop at 2019-04-16 11:21:01.480557
Stop comment: end run 132 for target change |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 21:58:15 2019 |
iulian Beyhan | VAMOS | Hardware | CH2 | Xf efficiency evolution |
Xf efficiency (normalized to CATS intensity) is directly linked with the beam intensity. The image below show a comparison between normalised Xf spectra on 3 different runs taken with different beam intensities:
Run 122 2019-04-13 06:31:00 4e+4
Run 130 2019-04-15 15:23:00 2.5e+5
Run 131 2019-04-15 20:41:00 2.5e+4
No dependence on time, dependence on intensity. |
| Attachment 1: Xf_efficency_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Tue Apr 16 00:01:43 2019 |
louis, Guiseppe | ONLINE | General | CH2 | Online snapshot from run 132 |
| Online snapshot from run 132 |
| Attachment 1: run131_Mugast_28.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: run131_Mugast_27.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: run131_Mugast_26.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: run131_Mugast_25.png
|
|
| Attachment 5: run131_Mugast_24.png
|
|
| Attachment 6: run131_Mugast_23.png
|
|
| Attachment 7: run131_Mugast_22.png
|
|
| Attachment 8: run131_Mugast_21.png
|
|
| Attachment 9: run131_Mugast_20.png
|
|
| Attachment 10: run131_Mugast_19.png
|
|
| Attachment 11: run131_Mugast_18.png
|
|
| Attachment 12: run131_Mugast_17.png
|
|
| Attachment 13: run131_Mugast_16.png
|
|
| Attachment 14: run131_Mugast_15.png
|
|
| Attachment 15: run131_Mugast_14.png
|
|
| Attachment 16: run131_Mugast_13.png
|
|
| Attachment 17: run131_Mugast_12.png
|
|
| Attachment 18: run131_Mugast_11.png
|
|
| Attachment 19: run131_Mugast_10.png
|
|
| Attachment 20: run131_Mugast_9.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Tue Apr 16 00:04:08 2019 |
beyhan | OFFLINE | General | | ewire evolution vs beam intensity (normalized to CATS intensity) |
|
| Attachment 1: EWIRE0_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 2: EWIRE1_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 3: EWIRE2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 4: EWIRE3_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Tue Apr 16 01:01:42 2019 |
beyhan, louis, serge, | OFFLINE | General | | different parameters evolution as function of intensity |
|
| Attachment 1: mM2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 2: mM_Q2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 3: mM_Q2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131_zoom.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 4: mV2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 5: mV2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131_zoom.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 6: T_FPMW_CATS2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Tue Apr 16 01:55:29 2019 |
louis, Guiseppe | ONLINE | General | CH2 | Log & Scalers -- Run 132 at 2:00 |
| Some of the spectra for VAMOS (in particular DC_EWIRE and IC_SUMMARY) disappeared |
| Attachment 1: run132_scaler.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: run132_VAMOS_1_2.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: run132_VAMOS_1_3.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: run132_VAMOS_1_4.png
|
|
| Attachment 5: run132_VAMOS_1_5.png
|
|
| Attachment 6: run132_VAMOS_1_6.png
|
|
| Attachment 7: run132_VAMOS_1_7.png
|
|
| Attachment 8: run132_VAMOS_1_9.png
|
|
| Attachment 9: run132_VAMOS_1_10.png
|
|
| Attachment 10: run132_VAMOS_1_11.png
|
|
| Attachment 11: run132_VAMOS_1_12.png
|
|
| Attachment 12: run132_Mugast_1.png
|
|
| Attachment 13: run132_Mugast_2.png
|
|
| Attachment 14: run132_Mugast_3.png
|
|
| Attachment 15: run132_Mugast_4.png
|
|
| Attachment 16: run132_Mugast_5.png
|
|
| Attachment 17: run132_Mugast_6.png
|
|
| Attachment 18: run132_Mugast_7.png
|
|
| Attachment 19: run132_Mugast_8.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Tue Apr 16 03:55:38 2019 |
louis, Guiseppe | ONLINE | General | CH2 | Log and scalers RUN 132 @4:00 |
| Internal trip at 3:37...fixed |
| Attachment 1: run132_scaler_1.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: run132_VAMOS_2_2.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: run132_VAMOS_2_3.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: run132_VAMOS_2_4.png
|
|
| Attachment 5: run132_VAMOS_2_5.png
|
|
| Attachment 6: run132_VAMOS_2_6.png
|
|
| Attachment 7: run132_VAMOS_2_7.png
|
|
| Attachment 8: run132_VAMOS_2_9.png
|
|
| Attachment 9: run132_VAMOS_2_10.png
|
|
| Attachment 10: run132_VAMOS_2_11.png
|
|
| Attachment 11: run132_VAMOS_2_12.png
|
|
| Attachment 12: run132_Mugast_2_1.png
|
|
| Attachment 13: run132_Mugast_2_2.png
|
|
| Attachment 14: run132_Mugast_2_3.png
|
|
| Attachment 15: run132_Mugast_2_4.png
|
|
| Attachment 16: run132_Mugast_2_5.png
|
|
| Attachment 17: run132_Mugast_2_6.png
|
|
| Attachment 18: run132_Mugast_2_7.png
|
|
| Attachment 19: run132_Mugast_2_8.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Tue Apr 16 05:53:00 2019 |
louis, Guiseppe | ONLINE | General | CH2 | Log and scalers RUN 132 @6:00 |
| Over-current on CATS2 is quite frequent. Clean spectra at 6:00 |
| Attachment 1: run132_scaler_2.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: run132_VAMOS_3_2.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: run132_VAMOS_3_3.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: run132_VAMOS_3_4.png
|
|
| Attachment 5: run132_VAMOS_3_5.png
|
|
| Attachment 6: run132_VAMOS_3_6.png
|
|
| Attachment 7: run132_VAMOS_3_7.png
|
|
| Attachment 8: run132_VAMOS_3_9.png
|
|
| Attachment 9: run132_VAMOS_3_10.png
|
|
| Attachment 10: run132_VAMOS_3_11.png
|
|
| Attachment 11: run132_VAMOS_3_12.png
|
|
| Attachment 12: run132_Mugast_3_1.png
|
|
| Attachment 13: run132_Mugast_3_2.png
|
|
| Attachment 14: run132_Mugast_3_3.png
|
|
| Attachment 15: run132_Mugast_3_4.png
|
|
| Attachment 16: run132_Mugast_3_5.png
|
|
| Attachment 17: run132_Mugast_3_6.png
|
|
| Attachment 18: run132_Mugast_3_7.png
|
|
| Attachment 19: run132_Mugast_3_8.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Tue Apr 16 07:53:16 2019 |
louis, Guiseppe | ONLINE | General | CH2 | Log and scalers RUN 132 @8:00 |
|
| Attachment 1: run132_scaler_3.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: run132_VAMOS_4_2.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: run132_VAMOS_4_3.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: run132_VAMOS_4_4.png
|
|
| Attachment 5: run132_VAMOS_4_5.png
|
|
| Attachment 6: run132_VAMOS_4_6.png
|
|
| Attachment 7: run132_VAMOS_4_7.png
|
|
| Attachment 8: run132_VAMOS_4_9.png
|
|
| Attachment 9: run132_VAMOS_4_10.png
|
|
| Attachment 10: run132_VAMOS_4_11.png
|
|
| Attachment 11: run132_VAMOS_4_12.png
|
|
| Attachment 12: run132_Mugast_4_1.png
|
|
| Attachment 13: run132_Mugast_4_2.png
|
|
| Attachment 14: run132_Mugast_4_3.png
|
|
| Attachment 15: run132_Mugast_4_4.png
|
|
| Attachment 16: run132_Mugast_4_5.png
|
|
| Attachment 17: run132_Mugast_4_6.png
|
|
| Attachment 18: run132_Mugast_4_7.png
|
|
| Attachment 19: run132_Mugast_4_8.png
|
|