| Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
| Ongoing | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 14:27:48 2020 |
mugast ; Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CD2 | Issues in the EX reconstruction |
| mugast ; valerian irene wrote: | We are currently working on the EX reconstruction which is off for detector 1, 3 and 7... One of our guess might be that there is an issue with the position of the detectors which gives error in theta... As the energy calibration is ok. Joined are :
- the Excitation energy for good detectors compared to all detectors,
- the theoretical kinematic line for the 3.57 state for each detectors,
- the excitation energy as a function of the laboratory angle (for this last spectra a clear dependency is visible for telescopes 1,3 and 7)
- the 3D view, which doesn't show clear problem in position... |
Testing changing the beam impact :
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
Red lines corresponds to Ex = 3.570 MeV and Ex = 4.070 MeV
To try to correct the problem i also offseted the beam in X and Y, but this doesn't solve the problem quite the opposite as it make the result worse for other detectors also... The fact that it is better at lower angle and worse at higher angle might mean that the detectors angles are tilted compared to the
surveyors measurments... I also tried to use the CAO positions for MG3 (see Detectors/mugast.detector) but it didn't solve the problem. |
| Ongoing | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 15:53:12 2020 |
mugast ; Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CD2-Au | Issues in the EX reconstruction |
| mugast ; Valerian wrote: |
| mugast ; valerian irene wrote: | We are currently working on the EX reconstruction which is off for detector 1, 3 and 7... One of our guess might be that there is an issue with the position of the detectors which gives error in theta... As the energy calibration is ok. Joined are :
- the Excitation energy for good detectors compared to all detectors,
- the theoretical kinematic line for the 3.57 state for each detectors,
- the excitation energy as a function of the laboratory angle (for this last spectra a clear dependency is visible for telescopes 1,3 and 7)
- the 3D view, which doesn't show clear problem in position... |
Testing changing the beam impact :
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
Red lines corresponds to Ex = 3.570 MeV and Ex = 4.070 MeV
To try to correct the problem i also offseted the beam in X and Y, but this doesn't solve the problem quite the opposite as it make the result worse for other detectors also... The fact that it is better at lower angle and worse at higher angle might mean that the detectors angles are tilted compared to the
surveyors measurments... I also tried to use the CAO positions for MG3 (see Detectors/mugast.detector) but it didn't solve the problem. |
By looking at the EnergyCalibrator.C, I saw that the extrapolation used to find the dead layer of aluminum is commented... This might be an answer to the problem... |
| Ongoing | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 17:18:02 2020 |
mugast ; Valerian, Marlène , Pierre | OFFLINE | Software | CD2-Au | Issues in the EX reconstruction |
| mugast ; Valerian wrote: |
| mugast ; Valerian wrote: |
| mugast ; valerian irene wrote: | We are currently working on the EX reconstruction which is off for detector 1, 3 and 7... One of our guess might be that there is an issue with the position of the detectors which gives error in theta... As the energy calibration is ok. Joined are :
- the Excitation energy for good detectors compared to all detectors,
- the theoretical kinematic line for the 3.57 state for each detectors,
- the excitation energy as a function of the laboratory angle (for this last spectra a clear dependency is visible for telescopes 1,3 and 7)
- the 3D view, which doesn't show clear problem in position... |
Testing changing the beam impact :
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
Red lines corresponds to Ex = 3.570 MeV and Ex = 4.070 MeV
To try to correct the problem i also offseted the beam in X and Y, but this doesn't solve the problem quite the opposite as it make the result worse for other detectors also... The fact that it is better at lower angle and worse at higher angle might mean that the detectors angles are tilted compared to the
surveyors measurments... I also tried to use the CAO positions for MG3 (see Detectors/mugast.detector) but it didn't solve the problem. |
By looking at the EnergyCalibrator.C, I saw that the extrapolation used to find the dead layer of aluminum is commented... This might be an answer to the problem... |
WE HAVE A SOLUTION!!! It seems that the order of the detectors in mugast.detector matters!! Now we start with a dummy MG8, then MG1, MG2, ... And everything is fine!! We think that is because it was taking the wrong calibration files (to be checked).
Joined are (for run 128,137,138,139,151,152,153):
-Ex vs ThetaLab
-Ex for all detectors
-Egamma vs Ex |
| Fixed | e793s |
Fri Mar 5 16:16:28 2021 |
mugast | DAQ | Software | | Pedestals for E793S | Pedestal alignment was performed for Energy qnd Time for all cards with cooling at 0°.
The values are attached here and saved in : cd ganacq_manip/mugast/das-save/pedestal-save/pedestal_5march2021_15h54/ |
| Pending | e793s |
Sat Mar 13 05:11:08 2021 |
Faïrouz, Juan Lois | AGATA | Software | CD2 | Problem with AGATA acquisition started at 4h40 |
There is a problem with AGATA Acquisition. All the bars in the global status & control are yellow!!!
This problem started at 4h40.
We called the acquisition astreinte but he doesn't know how to fix the problem.
We called Emmanuel but we got on the answering machine. We will call him again at 7 am.
The count rate of AGATA in the scaler looks ok: ~ 1200 |
| Fixed | e793s |
Sat Mar 13 07:29:56 2021 |
Faïrouz, Juan Lois | AGATA | Software | CD2 | AGATA acquisition problem fixed by Emmanuel | |
| Fixed | TEST |
Fri Dec 14 09:08:46 2018 |
Adrien Matta | OTHER | Social | N/A | Test Post | | MUGAST ELOG is now ONLINE |
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 10 06:45:53 2019 |
François | BEAM | Social | | No beam yet | | They are about to align the beam from the cyclotron CIME to the area G1. |
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 10 07:15:22 2019 |
François | BEAM | Social | | no beam |
They aligned the beam up to G1 Pr31 but the stripper foil was not inserted, so they have to start the work again. |
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 10 09:05:33 2019 |
François | BEAM | Social | | No beam in G1 yet. | | The beam is at the entrance of G1. |
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 10 10:15:38 2019 |
François | BEAM | Social | | Beam stopped | A problem with the cooling water.
2 UT at least to restart the accelerator |
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 10 11:46:04 2019 |
iulian | BEAM | Social | N/A | E744 Status | Refrigeration problem, beam stopped.
Optimistic estimation: they need 1 UT to setup CIME => 14N could be back around 20h.
Optimistic scenario still on track
Then need 2 UT's to set CSS1 -> 14O next day around 18h
No shifts until 24h00 (midnight) today.
Shift to resume 11/04 @00h00
18h30 14N beam is back. |
| Fixed | e744s |
Thu Apr 11 07:30:15 2019 |
mugast | BEAM | Social | N/A | Beam stop | | The beam will be back around 8:30. |
| Fixed | e744s |
Sat Apr 13 08:02:42 2019 |
Marion, Kseniia, Dieter, Didier, Guiseppe | ONLINE | Social | CH2 | Screenshots run 122 v1 | |
| Fixed | e744s |
Sat Apr 13 11:42:16 2019 |
Marion, Kseniia, Dieter, Didier, Guiseppe, IuliaH | ONLINE | Social | CH2 | Screenshots - spectra zeroed after previous screenshot taking | | spectra zeroed after previous screenshot taking |
| Fixed | e744s |
Sat Apr 13 12:04:56 2019 |
Adrien Matta | OTHER | Social | N/A | Blow some steam this afternoon (staturday13th) | If some of you want to blow some steam this afternoon Crossfit Caen ( located in Mondeville, you. Can find them on google map) is organising an initiation Wod this afternoon for their 4th anniversary. Here is the program of the day:
Les quatre ans de la boxe commence, on vous attend avec impatience et venez nombreux. 👌🏻💪🏻 Si vous voulez découvrir le Crossfit ou tout simplement essayer (wod initiation),ça sera avec plaisir ! 😁
4 ans de CrossfitCaen 🔥🔥
Le déroulement de la journée !! 👌🏻
10h-13h Floater 1
10h30 Wod Team 20 personnes
11h15 Initiation
12h Wod Élite
12h30 Wod Indiv
13h30 Kids
14h-17h Floater 2
14h15 Wod Indiv
15h Initiation
15h45 Wod Élite
16h30 Wod Team
20h Tenue Correcte Exigée |
| Fixed | e744s |
Sat Apr 13 13:13:18 2019 |
Marion, Kseniia, Dieter, Didier, Guiseppe, IuliaH | ONLINE | Social | CH2 | Screenshots run 122 v5 | |
| Fixed | e744s |
Sat Apr 13 15:31:32 2019 |
Marion, Kseniia, Dieter, Didier, Guiseppe, IuliaH, Catalin | ONLINE | Social | CH2 | Screenshots run 122.1 v6 | | "1_" added to screenshot filenames to indicate automatic file opening |
| Fixed | e744s |
Sun Apr 14 03:30:28 2019 |
Iulian Iulia | OFFLINE | Social | CH2 | first calculation ECM ThetaCM for gamma-P emission | |
| Fixed | e744s |
Sun Apr 14 08:41:52 2019 |
Nikola Dieter Nicolas Beyhan Kseniia | ONLINE | Social | CH2 | Log & Scalers -- Run 122 at 08:40 | | Spectra zeroed after screenshot taking |
|