MUST2 SAMURAI_2018 S3-LEB-LPC SUPERNEMO MUGAST EXPAND SCALP GALATRON HiCARI VELO
  MUGAST, Page 36 of 132  Not logged in MUGAST
Status ExpNbrdown Date Author Type Category Target-Source Subject
Fixede768s Tue Jul 23 11:02:54 2019 Kseniia, GilbertBEAMGeneral Beam profile
Attachment 1: FF0E1C03-CD2A-4BAB-8E82-26422F7EB866.jpeg
FF0E1C03-CD2A-4BAB-8E82-26422F7EB866.jpeg
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2019-07-23_11-04-17.png
Screenshot_from_2019-07-23_11-04-17.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2019-07-23_11-04-05.png
Screenshot_from_2019-07-23_11-04-05.png
Fixede768s Tue Jul 23 12:00:25 2019 ChristianBEAMGeneralLiFProfiler and beam current scaling since 11;10
See also AGATA elog and run-log entry
Fixede768s Tue Jul 23 13:11:36 2019 OttoRunRUNGeneralLiFRun127
*************************
Run : 127
*************************

Start at 2019-07-23 13:09:00.419349


Beam intensity: 1.5e7 pps
OR VAMOS ~ 1100 Hz
after check of beam intensity on target (factor of 2 in transmission with target)


Target: 1.25 mg/cm2 (nb 1) 7LiF

Triggers:
MUGAST (backward, MM, 90 deg)
VAMOS %100
BaF2 %100

Rates:

FAG: 87
MUGAST: 70
OR AGATA: 1100
OR VAMOS: 940


MG3 pedestal suppression between 0 and 6800

Shift of beam, retuning from PCP

Stop at 2019-07-23 13:17:22.129736
Stop comment: End of short run 127
Fixede768s Tue Jul 23 13:20:20 2019 mugastRUNGeneralN/ABeam stop for canicule
At 13.16 the beam was stopped due to the high temperature.
Bertrand is switching off the magnets of VAMOS.
Fixede768s Tue Jul 23 14:33:03 2019 Marlène, Yorick, Faïrouz & NicolasBEAMGeneral Cheking beam transmission from G1 profiler to VAMOS
Goal:
Estimate beam transmission from profiler to VAMOS (FP)
We question whether the factor of two found yesterday (VAMOS/Profiler ~ 0.5) could be due:
1. to an incorrect measurement of the beam intensity with the profiler
2. a charge state equilibration in the target (LISE++ calculation indicates 8+/7+ = 85%/15%)

Same conditions as yesterday:
1. Beam intensity is reduced with the pepper pot 1/9 and by closing slits after the 15O target production and the accelerators so that the beam quality (emittance, etc...) is not affected.
2. VAMOS plate is removed to allow the direct beam detection

Results:
We measure in VAMOS with the LiF target and with the target ladder totally removed. In the latter case, direct beam 15O(8+) is sent in VAMOS and no charge state effect enter into the game.
1. Beam intensity at G1 profiler ~ 6.5e4 pps
VAMOS (FP) + no target ~ 3.8e4 pps
2. Beam intensity at G1 profiler ~ 3.8e4 pps
VAMOS (FP) + thick LiF (nb 1) ~ 2.0e4 pps

Discussion:
We find the same results as yesterday, e.g. a factor of two attenuation between the profiler and VAMOS. If part of this loss would happen in the pipe/target/MUST2 mask, this should be observed in AGATA which is not the case. Could it be that the PPAC in VAMOS is not as efficient as announced at the beginning of the campaign (98%)? This must be checked when we get beam back later on.

Note:
While doing the above measurement, we observed a factor of 3 loss between profiler AR.Gaz13 and G1.Gaz31. Numbers follows:
L3.GAZ42 AR.GAZ13 G1.GAZ31
2.1e4 1.5e4 4.1e3
1.4e5 1.0e5 2.5e4
??? 1.8e5 6.5e4
Attachment 1: 714D4921-2A75-44B7-AD8D-87048BDA17A8.jpeg
714D4921-2A75-44B7-AD8D-87048BDA17A8.jpeg
Attachment 2: 6A77930D-8992-4118-B59C-DBAA37289533.jpeg
6A77930D-8992-4118-B59C-DBAA37289533.jpeg
Attachment 3: 3CD66D1D-D6E6-44B4-A15A-C947F048D2A0.jpeg
3CD66D1D-D6E6-44B4-A15A-C947F048D2A0.jpeg
Fixede768s Tue Jul 23 15:03:54 2019 Diego RamosOTHERHardwareN/ADiamond threshold
The threshold of the Diamond was increased from ~50 mV to ~300 mV
Fixede768s Tue Jul 23 16:19:14 2019 MarlèneOTHERHardware VAMOS division
VAMOS division was set 10 instead of 100.
CATS 1 & CATS2 scalers are sent to the two last channels of the scaler
Fixede768s Tue Jul 23 19:21:50 2019 NicolasOTHERSocialN/AWaiting end of canicule (and beam!)
Attachment 1: IMG_20190723_173257.jpg
IMG_20190723_173257.jpg
Fixede768s Wed Jul 24 12:40:49 2019 OttoRunRUNGeneralLiFRun128
*************************
Run : 128
*************************

Start at 2019-07-24 12:40:32.602728

Test of scalers

Stop at 2019-07-24 12:43:18.414715
Stop comment:
Fixede768s Wed Jul 24 13:33:34 2019 OttoRunRUNGeneralLiFRun129
*************************
Run : 129
*************************

Start at 2019-07-24 13:29:27.436829

Test of scalers

Started with the setting of VAMOS with 15N beam + target. Plate removed.

Stop at 2019-07-24 14:22:17.151753
Stop comment: type your message here
Fixede768s Wed Jul 24 14:41:09 2019 mugastRUNGeneralN/AVAMOS divison 30
VAMOs division is set to 30
Fixede768s Wed Jul 24 14:57:51 2019 OttoRunRUNGeneralLiFRun130
*************************
Run : 130
*************************

Start at 2019-07-24 14:45:43.707908

Test of scalers

Started with the setting of VAMOS with 15N beam + target. Plate removed.

Stop at 2019-07-24 14:57:53.598976
Stop comment:
Fixede768s Wed Jul 24 15:12:07 2019 OttoRunRUNGeneralLiFRun132
*************************
Run : 132
*************************

Start at 2019-07-24 15:05:21.496150

Test of scalers

Started with the setting of VAMOS with 15N beam + target. Plate removed.

Stop at 2019-07-24 15:53:35.796063
Stop comment:
Fixede768s Wed Jul 24 16:04:04 2019 OttoRunRUNGeneralLiFRun133
*************************
Run : 133
*************************

Start at 2019-07-24 16:01:41.339572

Stable 15N beam @ ~ 1-2e8 pps

Brho = Tm

target LiF thick number 1

Trigger:
MUGAST
VAMOS %30
BaF2 %100

Stop at 2019-07-24 16:44:55.787916
Stop comment: type your message here
Fixede768s Wed Jul 24 16:24:18 2019 NicolasOTHERGeneral 19Ne / 19F analog connections
Attachment 1: ne19_f19_AnalogStates.pdf
ne19_f19_AnalogStates.pdf ne19_f19_AnalogStates.pdf
Fixede768s Wed Jul 24 16:51:16 2019 OttoRunRUNGeneralLiFRun135
*************************
Run : 135
*************************

Start at 2019-07-24 16:43:07.051256

Stable 15N beam @ ~ 1-2e8 pps

Brho = 0.64 Tm (ref Brho = central trajectory)

target LiF thick number 1

Trigger:1100
MUGAST 1500
VAMOS %30 4500
BaF2 %100
DT 20%

Stop at 2019-07-25 07:21:33.253248
Stop comment: End of run 135
Fixede768s Wed Jul 24 17:21:27 2019 DiegoOTHERGeneral VAMOS Acceptance with different positions of the beam in the target
Attachment 1: VAMOS_acceptance_for_different_positions_at_the_target.png
VAMOS_acceptance_for_different_positions_at_the_target.png
Fixede768s Wed Jul 24 22:10:04 2019 Chloé, YorickONLINEGeneralLiFSpectra Run 135 24/07/19 22:00
Attachment 1: MG_ETOF_run135.png
MG_ETOF_run135.png
Attachment 2: MM_deE_run135.png
MM_deE_run135.png
Attachment 3: MM_ETOF_run135.png
MM_ETOF_run135.png
Attachment 4: MGimpact_run135.png
MGimpact_run135.png
Attachment 5: MMimpact_run135.png
MMimpact_run135.png
Attachment 6: Scalers-run135.png
Scalers-run135.png
Fixede768s Thu Jul 25 03:58:19 2019 François et GilbertRUNGeneralLiFSpectra Run 135 25/07/19 4:00
Second snapshot of run 135
Spectra refreshed
Attachment 1: Scalers_run135b
Attachment 2: MG_TOF_run135b
Attachment 3: MM_deE_run135b
Attachment 4: MM_ETOF_run135b
Attachment 5: MG_IMPACT_run135b
Attachment 6: MG_ETOF_run135b
Fixede768s Thu Jul 25 07:00:15 2019 mugastRUNGeneralLiFRun 135 - stop
Qpole 41 lost (Q41). Beam stopped before recovery.
Operator not able to get it back. Will try without waiting on next operator.
Attachment 1: Scalers_run135_end
Attachment 2: MG_ETOF_run135_end
Attachment 3: MM_deE_run135_end
Attachment 4: MM_ETOF_run135_end
Attachment 5: MG_Impact_run135_end
Attachment 6: MM_Impact_run135_end

ELOG Home Page