| Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
| Fixed | e793s |
Sun Mar 14 15:20:47 2021 |
Adrien | OFFLINE | General | CD2 | Updated Angular distribution macro |
The angular distribution macro has been updated and now produce TWOFNR calculation on the fly.
Feel free to add new plots and play around with the parameter.
MakePlot will produce the distribution using Ex and sigmaEx of the state and Eg and sigmaG of the gamma. Efficiency is automatically taken into account using the efficiency provided by manu.
FIT will perform the TWOFNR calculation using The energy of the state, l and j of the transferred nucleon and J of the formed states. Once the calculation done, it does the fit to the data and extract the C2S.
I found the number strangely small so I suspect we do something wrong.
To run it:
Open a terminal
$> lpcgrit
$> npp MUGAST
$> cd e793s
$> root AngDist.C |
| Fixed | e793s |
Thu Mar 11 01:24:47 2021 |
Ablaihan, Louis | RUN | General | CD2 | run 53 screenshots |
Screenshots of the run 53
Beam intensity is ~ 7.4 10^5 pps in CATS and 5.3 10^5 in VAMOS
~75% transmition
Dt is ~ 3% |
| Attachment 1: run53_Scalers.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: run53_MM_Impact.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: run53_Times.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: run53_VAMOS_MWpng
|
| Attachment 5: run53_MM_TY.png
|
|
| Attachment 6: run53_MM_TX.png
|
|
| Attachment 7: run53_MG_TY.png
|
|
| Attachment 8: run53_MG_TX.png
|
|
| Attachment 9: run53_MM_ErawY.png
|
|
| Attachment 10: run53_MM_ErawX.png
|
|
| Attachment 11: run53_MG_ErawY.png
|
|
| Attachment 12: run53_MG_ErawX.png
|
|
| Attachment 13: run53_MG_E_TOF.png
|
|
| Attachment 14: run53_MM_dEE.png
|
|
| Attachment 15: run53_MM_E_TOF.png
|
|
| Attachment 16: run53_MG_impact.png
|
|
| Fixed | e793s |
Thu Mar 11 02:50:14 2021 |
Ablaihan, Louis | BEAM | General | CD2 | VAMOS transmition |
| at 2h50 beam intensity reached 1.1x10^6 pps in CATS for 6.5x10^5 pps in VAMOS. The transmition decreased to 60% without any shift of the beam position. Does it come from a loss of efficiency of VAMOS at high counting rate? |
| Fixed | e793s |
Thu Mar 11 04:38:31 2021 |
Ablaihan, Louis | BEAM | General | CD2 | Beam stopped due to a equipment tripped in CSS1 |
Beam stopped 4h30 due to a equipment tripped in CSS1. They are going to fix it. Estimated timing of the intervention ~10/20min.
Beam went back at 4h52 at 3.5x10^5 pps in CATS and 3.0x10^5 pps in VAMOS. transmision ~ 85% |
| Attachment 1: Scaler_run53_4h30.png
|
|
| Fixed | e793s |
Thu Mar 11 05:12:36 2021 |
Ablaihan, Louis | RUN | General | CD2 | run 53 new screenshots |
|
| Attachment 1: run53_1_MMMG_T.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: run53_1_MM_Impact.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: run53_1_MG_impact.png
|
|
| Fixed | |
Tue Apr 16 12:18:46 2019 |
AGATA | AGATA | Hardware | | ATC4 - position 13 HV tripped |
- HV tripped around 12h10.
- need access to check the origin |
| Fixed | |
Tue Apr 16 13:15:48 2019 |
AGATA | AGATA | Hardware | | ATC4 - position 13 HV tripped |
set 1500 V at 13h15 |
| Fixed | |
Wed Apr 17 11:25:29 2019 |
AGATA | AGATA | General | | AGATA background in Coinc with MUST2 with 14O beam |
https://lxagata0.ganil.fr:8989/e744/56
http://run-control:8989/e744/56 |
| Pinned | e744s |
Wed Apr 10 11:57:37 2019 |
A. Lemasson | OFFLINE | Software | | VAMOS Conversion HowTo |
HOW TO convert a run in VAMOS
- Do : source $HOME/GoToVamosAna
- To Convert a Run : MyVAna -d2Ar <RunNr>
- Otherwise, If you want to convert a single file : MyVAna -d2Ar -f <Infile> <OutFile>
- Output Root rile is written to : ./RootA/
If you encounter the error on Brho "Could not find the BrhoRef for the run <RunNr> ", Update the ./Calibs/ListBrho.dat file with relevant Brho for RunNr |
| Fixed | e744s |
Thu Apr 11 00:06:50 2019 |
A. Lemasson | RUN | General | N/A | Run58 |
| Without Finger 21 kHz -> Reduced to 800 Hz with finger |
| Attachment 1: XfTFFinger.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: run58_Brho_Cats2_14N.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Sun Apr 14 15:05:06 2019 |
A. Lemasson | VAMOS | Hardware | | Change of Offset in DC Numexo |
- Increasing offset to minimize saturation.
- Reducing DC Threholds
- DC0 436 ->355 mV
- DC1 255 ->255 mV
- DC2 269 ->269 mV
- DC3 600 ->433 mV
|
| Attachment 1: DC_NUMEXO_AfterChange.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: DC_NUMEXO_BeforeChnage.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 12:33:52 2019 |
A. Lemasson | VAMOS | Hardware | | Test Run 127 : Change if IC Shaping |
Try to change IC Shaping to solve the pb of Continuous Line in IC0 vs IC1
Change Shaping on all IC during run 126 Change Chan 5-12 from Filter B (3us) to Filter A (1us)
Regarding The line IC0 vs IC1 :
- If Filter A The y =x line disapear, but the resolution deteriorate (22% compared 9 % in Filter B)
- No clear effect of the Thresholds of
- No clear effect of decay time on the resolution
Back to initial conditions of Run 126 |
| Attachment 1: IC_Threshold_BeforeChange_run126.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: IC_Decay_BeforeChange_run127.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: IC_CHange_Shaping__run127.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: IC_Shaping_Restore_run127.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 15:18:55 2019 |
A. Lemasson | VAMOS | Hardware | | Optimization of IC Shaping |
During Run 129,
1) investigation of the trapezoidal filter of IC
2) The Conclusion is that if we reduce the shaping to 2.5 us we reduce the random line in IC vs IC (At 1e5 in VAMOS : Random Line / Peak is 18.5 % compared to 40% for shaping of 3us)
3) The 2.5us us also optimum for the resolution (oscillation of the abse line after the filter very sensitive to K, with freq of ~500Khz)
/!\ Increasing intensity during the study
Flat Top 1.07 , 320ns k+0.5M
K sigma
0.5 81 530
1.0 236 1038 0.53
1.5 161 1549 0.25
2. 215 2039 0.247
2.5 156 2554 0.1435
3. 260 3082 0.196
Changing N
320 2.5 126 2554 0.116
160 2.5 126 2554 0.116
40 2.5 130 2554 0.119
Chnging Q
2980 40 2.5 130 2554 0.1119
3300 40 2.5 134 2554 0.123
Chnging M
1070 3300 40 2.5 134 2554 0.123
500 2900 40 2.5 145 2554 0.133
750 3000 40 2.5 145 2554 0.133
-> Final Setting is
M Q N K
1070 3200 160 2.5 -> 126/2554 -> 0.116 |
| Attachment 1: IC_Shapingafter_run129.png
|
|
| Fixed | e786s |
Tue Jun 25 15:33:40 2019 |
A Lemasson | VAMOS | General | | VAMOS Analysis - Brho |
VAMOS Analysis :
VAMOS PID with attached SetAlias.C
Suggestion to change Brho from 1.05 to 0.95 based on the distribution of K ions to optimize acceptance on the K
ions |
| Attachment 1: dEE_r56.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: Q_vs_Xf_All_r56.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: Q_vs_Xf_K_r56.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: Brho_E_K_r56.png
|
|
| Attachment 5: Q_MQ_K_r56.png
|
|
| Attachment 6: SetAlias.C
|
char cond[1000];
TTree *t1;
void SetAlias()
{
gStyle->SetPalette(1);
t1 = (TTree*) gROOT->FindObject("AD")
;
t1->SetAlias("fExist_DC_Y","DC0_Y>-1500&&DC1_Y>-1500&&DC2_Y>-1500&&DC3_Y>-1500");
t1->SetAlias("fExist_IC","IC[0]>0&&IC[1]>0&&IC[2]>0&&IC[3]>0");
t1->SetAlias("mT","(T_FPMW_CATS2_C*-1 + 305.3 + -4*(MWTVN==8)-1*(MWTVN==9)-1*(MWTVN==10)-2.2*(MWTVN==11)-0.7*(MWTVN==12)-0.5*(MWTVN==15)-0.6*(MWTVN==16)-1.1*(MWTVN==17)+0.6*(MWTVN==18)-1*(MWTVN==6)-0.5*(MWTVN==5)-0.5*(MWTVN==4)-1.5*(MWTVN==3))*(T_FPMW_CATS1_C>10)");
t1->SetAlias("mD","D");
t1->SetAlias("mV","(mD)/mT");
t1->SetAlias("mBeta","mV/29.9792");
t1->SetAlias("mGamma","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta*mBeta)");
t1->SetAlias("mM_Q","Brho/3.107/mBeta/mGamma");
t1->SetAlias("mM","(mE)/931.5016/(mGamma-1.)");
t1->SetAlias("mMr","mM_Q*((13.*qmq13+14.*qmq14+15.*qmq15+16.*qmq16))");
t1->SetAlias("mQ","mM/mM_Q");
//t1->SetAlias("mT1","(T_FPMW_HF_C*-1. + 559. + 3*(MWTVN==8))*(T_FPMW_HF_C>10)");
t1->SetAlias("mT1","1.5+((23.7593+1.03259*MWTV)*(MWTVN==0)+(-9.53168+1.0711*MWTV)*(MWTVN==1)+(-30.486+1.11554*MWTV)*(MWTVN==2)+(-31.1261+1.11624*MWTV)*(MWTVN==3)+(-62.99829+1.1569*MWTV)*(MWTVN==4)+(-47.9021+1.13413*MWTV)*(MWTVN==5)+(-14.3957+1.08086*MWTV)*(MWTVN==6)+(-24.6655+1.1058*MWTV)*(MWTVN==7)+(60.4375+0.981809*MWTV)*(MWTVN==8)+(4.44472+1.06168*MWTV)*(MWTVN==9)+(11.408+1.04492*MWTV)*(MWTVN==10)+(56.8282+0.990287*MWTV)*(MWTVN==11)+(59.6833+0.995356*MWTV)*(MWTVN==12)+(27.6344+1.02846*MWTV)*(MWTVN==13)+(6.02794+1.06554*MWTV)*(MWTVN==14)+(20.1561+1.0342*MWTV)*(MWTVN==15)+(51.0718+1.01008*MWTV)*(MWTVN==16)+(36.5605+1.0391*MWTV)*(MWTVN==17)+(-6.01158+1.09581*MWTV)*(MWTVN==18)+(37.6143+1.00939*MWTV)*(MWTVN==19)+(29.3289+1.01291*MWTV)*(MWTVN==20) + 3*83.4*(GATCONF_MASTER==8)-0*(GATCONF_MASTER==1)-2*83.4*(GATCONF_MASTER==4))");
t1->SetAlias("mT1","540-2*T_FPMW_CATS2_C");
t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[0]+IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3]+IC[4])*(IC[0]>0.1&&IC[1]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1&&IC[3]>0.1)");
// t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3])*(IC[1]>1&&IC[2]>1&&IC[3]>1)");
t1->SetAlias("mdE0","IC[0]*(IC[0]>1)");
t1->SetAlias("mdE1","IC[0]*(IC[0]>1)+IC[1]*(IC[1]>1)");
t1->SetAlias("mD1","Path");
t1->SetAlias("mV1","mD1/(mT1)");
t1->SetAlias("mBeta1","mV1/29.9792");
t1->SetAlias("mGamma1","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta1*mBeta1)");
t1->SetAlias("mM_Q1","Brho/3.107/mBeta1/mGamma1");
t1->SetAlias("mM1","1.3*(mE1)/931.5016/(mGamma1-1.)");
t1->SetAlias("mMr","mM_Q*((13.*qmq13+14.*qmq14+15.*qmq15+16.*qmq16))");
t1->SetAlias("mQ1","mM1/mM_Q1");
t1->SetAlias("ProjD","-174.*1.");
t1->SetAlias("Xt","TMW1_X+ProjD*tan(TP_Theta/1000.)");
t1->SetAlias("Yt","TMW1_Y+ProjD*tan(TP_Phi/1000.)");
t1->SetAlias("mT2","540.5-2.*T_FPMW_CATS2_C+2.7*(MWTVN==16)+2.7*(MWTVN==15)+2.9*(MWTVN==14)+2.9*(MWTVN==13)+2.4*(MWTVN==12)+1.3*(MWTVN==11)+1.5*(MWTVN==10)+1.6*(MWTVN==9)-0.6*(MWTVN==8)+2.5*(MWTVN==7)+2.*(MWTVN==6)+1.6*(MWTVN==5)+1.1*(MWTVN==4)-0.6*(MWTVN==3)-1.2*(MWTVN==2)-4.0*(MWTVN==1)");
//t1->SetAlias("mT2","mT1-TMWT1_MWT2_C+31");
// t1->SetAlias("mT2","mT1-4.83");
t1->SetAlias("mdE2","(IC[0]+IC[1]*(IC[0]>0.1)");
t1->SetAlias("mE2","0.85*(pow(Xf+450*tan(Tf/1000.),2)*0.0000015*IC[0] + 2.2*IC[0]+1.1*IC[1]*(IC[0]>0.1)+1.34*1.95*IC[2]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)+3.1*IC[3]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)+1.05*IC[4]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)+IC[5]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)*(IC[4]>0.1))");
// t1->SetAlias("mE2","0.825*(2.4*IC[0]+IC[1]*(IC[0]>0.1)+1.5*1.95*IC[2]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)+3.16*IC[3]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)+1.1*IC[4]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)+IC[5]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)*(IC[4]>0.1))");
//t1->SetAlias("mE2","IC[0]+IC[1]*(IC[0]>0.1)+2*IC[2]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)+2*IC[3]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)+IC[4]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)+IC[5]*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)*(IC[4]>0.1)");
t1->SetAlias("mdE21","(IC[0]+IC[1])*(IC[0]>1&&IC[1]>0.1)");
t1->SetAlias("mE21","(IC[0]+IC[1]+2*IC[2]+2*IC[3]+IC[4]+IC[5])*(IC[0]>0.1)*(IC[1]>0.1)*(IC[2]>0.1)*(IC[3]>0.1)");
t1->SetAlias("mD2","Path+5");
t1->SetAlias("mV2","mD2/(mT2)");
t1->SetAlias("mBeta2","mV2/29.9792");
t1->SetAlias("mGamma2","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta2*mBeta2)");
t1->SetAlias("mM_Q2","Brho/3.105/mBeta2/mGamma2");
t1->SetAlias("mM2","(mE2)/931.5016/(mGamma2-1.)");
t1->SetAlias("mQ2","mM2/mM_Q2");
t1->SetAlias("mMrec","int(mQ2+0.5)*mM_Q2");
t1->SetAlias("Gamma_from_E","mE2/14./931.5016+1");
t1->SetAlias("Beta_from_E","sqrt(1.-1./pow(Gamma_from_E,2))");
t1->SetAlias("Brho_from_E","14./8*3.105*Beta_from_E*Gamma_from_E");
t1->SetAlias("mEM","(3.7*IC[0]+IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3]*(IC[2]>0.1)+18./55*IC[4]*(IC[3]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1) + 7.*IC[5]*(IC[4]>0.1&&IC[3]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1) )*(IC[0]>1&&IC[1]>0.1&&IC[2]>1&&IC[3]>1)");
}
|
| Attachment 7: Mr_K_r56.png
|
|
| Attachment 8: QMQ_K_Gates.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Thu Apr 11 00:23:21 2019 |
Iulian François Marlène | RUN | Hardware | CH2 | TAC changes & target |
We have inserted the 2nd target CH2 104 um.
We have changed the range of the TAC MUGAST-HF from 1us to 200ns.
TAC VAMOS-CATS1 (in fact CATS2) was not working in the previous run because there was no delay on CATS. We send now CATS DELAY x2, meaning that the delay is 300ns. |
| | |
Mon Apr 15 04:34:00 2019 |
| | | | |
|