MUST2 SAMURAI_2018 S3-LEB-LPC SUPERNEMO MUGAST EXPAND SCALP GALATRON HiCARI VELO
  MUGAST, Page 131 of 132  Not logged in MUGAST
 Find |  Login 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show only new entries   2636 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 130, 131, 132   Next  
Status ExpNbr Date Authordown Type Category Target-Source Subject
Fixede744s Sat Apr 13 22:04:32 2019 Adrien MattaRUNGeneralN/AInconsistent info in the run message

Adrien Matta wrote:
Be careful to fill in correctly all info in the start run message.

There is inconsistency in run 121 comment (target 2) and list (target 3).

Thèse information will be used for the analysis.


--> The misleading comment is preseved from run 103,
... the last #2 target was at run 110
... Iulian is removing the comments on #2 target that appear untill 121
Fixedcom2019 Wed Apr 3 16:24:37 2019 AdrienCATSSoftwareN/ACalib file from T.Roger
Here are the calibration file provided by T. Roger.
Attachment 1: CATS2_Y.vamos2019 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
2.71193e+02 3.51955e+01 9.20106e-01 
2.54820e+02 3.85477e+01 1.02407e+00 
2.70765e+02 9.63413e+01 1.01270e+00 
2.38067e+02 -1.94775e+02 2.02755e+00 
2.70950e+02 2.18371e+01 9.74726e-01 
2.71165e+02 1.20869e+02 1.07928e+00 
9.13653e+00 3.16800e+02 1.00754e+00 
5.66055e+02 -2.33425e+02 9.05174e-01 
2.87582e+02 4.24426e+01 9.10918e-01 
2.71272e+02 3.51955e+01 9.20106e-01 
2.87581e+02 1.47364e+01 9.01484e-01 
2.87546e+02 6.66734e+00 9.93090e-01 
2.05666e+02 1.43008e+02 9.85243e-01 
3.03492e+02 0.00000e+00 1.00000e+00 
3.03819e+02 -6.17854e+00 9.23957e-01 
7.46067e+01 2.16790e+02 8.97818e-01 
4.18173e+02 -1.88169e+01 8.82782e-01 
2.70940e+02 6.14310e+01 8.89892e-01 
2.38432e+02 9.12262e+01 8.87560e-01 
2.38441e+02 7.85597e+01 8.77800e-01 
2.38442e+02 8.48885e+01 8.70873e-01 
2.22035e+02 1.14424e+02 8.95446e-01 
2.54389e+02 8.12120e+01 8.90312e-01 
2.21670e+02 1.59730e+02 9.33857e-01 
2.70937e+02 7.20531e+01 8.66403e-01 
5.82149e+01 2.32593e+02 8.43761e-01 
2.87581e+02 -1.28631e+02 2.74796e+00
Attachment 2: CATS2_X.vamos2019 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
3.44896e+02 5.63680e+01 9.41419e-01 
3.44871e+02 2.74924e+01 8.93518e-01 
3.12042e+02 2.41995e+02 9.38371e-01 
2.79148e+02 3.23114e+02 1.10331e+00 
1.48358e+02 3.41540e+02 9.18807e-01 
1.80540e+02 4.53841e+02 9.26752e-01 
4.10458e+02 -5.02746e+01 9.52866e-01 
3.44871e+02 -2.17129e+02 1.19034e+00 
3.77669e+02 3.74782e+01 9.33222e-01 
3.77669e+02 8.51246e+01 8.96266e-01 
3.77644e+02 1.11250e+02 9.87395e-01 
3.44871e+02 -1.76949e+01 9.49754e-01 
3.77669e+02 0.00000e+00 1.00000e+00 
3.77663e+02 7.06397e+01 9.18807e-01 
2.13851e+02 1.68237e+02 9.52866e-01 
3.11592e+02 2.51688e+02 9.15915e-01 
2.79820e+02 1.11250e+02 9.87395e-01 
2.46601e+02 1.27417e+02 1.03243e+00 
2.79372e+02 1.46788e+02 8.79335e-01 
2.79380e+02 2.32394e+02 8.93518e-01 
3.12042e+02 1.81364e+02 9.23798e-01 
2.79366e+02 1.00739e+02 9.18807e-01 
2.46616e+02 1.03641e+02 9.03826e-01 
2.46587e+02 1.39501e+02 9.36753e-01 
3.44871e+02 2.12105e+02 9.11509e-01 
2.79146e+02 1.51065e+02 2.75169e+00
Attachment 3: CATS1_Y.vamos2019 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
1.13931e+03 -3.52970e+02 9.68936e-01 
8.44459e+02 -1.44555e+02 1.07619e+00 
4.01828e+02 2.94406e+02 8.99414e-01 
3.53072e+02 3.83002e+02 1.07128e+00 
4.18602e+02 2.07103e+02 9.97538e-01 
4.18604e+02 2.22703e+02 9.35567e-01 
3.20322e+02 4.63142e+02 1.12991e+00 
3.69469e+02 3.68467e+02 9.91268e-01 
3.69466e+02 3.40471e+02 1.00655e+00 
3.69533e+02 3.23507e+02 9.85421e-01 
3.20391e+02 4.16747e+02 1.00459e+00 
3.03942e+02 3.77691e+02 9.26262e-01 
7.29833e+02 -1.81899e-12 1.00000e+00 
3.36702e+02 4.72202e+02 1.07558e+00 
3.20323e+02 5.25219e+02 1.01355e+00 
2.71183e+02 3.20537e+02 8.57953e-01 
3.20324e+02 4.53551e+02 9.49811e-01 
2.38494e+02 5.25479e+02 9.09205e-01 
3.20349e+02 4.37876e+02 8.58610e-01 
4.18602e+02 3.18712e+02 9.32195e-01 
3.85855e+02 2.52608e+02 9.56052e-01 
4.34843e+02 2.54458e+02 9.89716e-01 
4.50450e+02 1.87712e+02 8.76905e-01 
3.20254e+02 8.14065e+02 1.60565e+00 
3.53085e+02 2.57256e+02 9.52991e-01 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
Attachment 4: CATS1_X.vamos2019 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
1.40161e+02 9.92071e+01 9.76396e-01 
1.89289e+02 -2.69023e+00 1.68488e+00 
3.20343e+02 2.87366e+02 9.03085e-01 
1.56522e+02 6.72206e+01 9.76396e-01 
1.07402e+02 4.08998e+01 8.72104e-01 
1.40150e+02 8.09504e+01 1.02684e+00 
1.89310e+02 -5.35298e+01 1.48523e+00 
3.20322e+02 -1.42885e+02 9.20481e-01 
2.22045e+02 -2.12294e+01 1.00833e+00 
1.23762e+02 4.60139e+01 8.42356e-01 
1.40150e+02 1.46407e+02 1.09613e+00 
2.70859e+02 -2.25241e+02 1.59755e+00 
2.05264e+02 -9.09495e-13 1.00000e+00 
2.71182e+02 -3.42651e+01 8.87728e-01 
3.36702e+02 1.07801e+02 8.72316e-01 
3.36720e+02 1.24392e+02 9.02291e-01 
3.03966e+02 1.23800e+02 9.90423e-01 
2.87562e+02 1.39729e+02 9.89467e-01 
3.36702e+02 1.30358e+02 8.86667e-01 
3.03668e+02 1.68313e+02 8.83800e-01 
3.20254e+02 1.38346e+02 7.81607e-01 
3.20392e+02 1.41100e+02 7.62264e-01 
3.69438e+02 -1.65316e+02 1.32820e+00 
3.53090e+02 8.71354e+01 7.81607e-01 
3.36451e+02 9.07214e+01 7.77743e-01 
2.87388e+02 1.41433e+02 6.18790e-01
Fixedcom2019 Wed Apr 3 21:43:22 2019 AdrienONLINEGeneralN/ATest correlation between different VXI acq

iulian ruxandra fairouz wrote:
Test performed using a 100 Hz pulser signal send into the master trigger (entry 9 on GMTMASTER) and the analogical part send into a amplifier then split in 3 signal send to VXI MUGAST , VXI CATS and VXI Vamos.
No problem observed. See first image below (test_corel_Pulesr_all.png)


Didn't work properly with a tac signal divided in 3 or from 3 tacs with same start /stop. See test_corel.png and test_corel_2000.png
This might be due to the time calibrator trigger as it is very random and pile-up effects can contribute. Maybe with a very low trigger rate might work



  • The tac plot look convincing to me, the diagonal peaks seems to hold almost all the stat.
  • On the other hand I found it difficult to conclude from the pulser one, seems all event hold the same value, any miscorrelation in the merger would lead to the same plot.
Fixedcom2019 Mon Apr 8 10:58:16 2019 AdrienOFFLINEGeneralCD2Checked alignement of the different Silicon at backward angle
Here is a plot of Ex for all the com. stats detector by detector.

The Spectrum are overall well aligned.
Attachment 1: Ex_byDetector.png
Ex_byDetector.png
Fixede744s Wed Apr 10 09:06:16 2019 AdrienOFFLINEGeneralN/AStrange size of Time Calibrator Run
The two run for MUVI 1 are larger than the run for MUVI2 and 3.

I think this is due to the noise on MG4 that create a lot of Data but it need to be investigated.

The run are now converted to root using offline.

-r--r--r-- 1 mugast Exxx 2,0G 9 avril 18:52 run_0017.dat.09-04-19_18h29m04s
-r--r--r-- 1 mugast Exxx 2,4G 9 avril 19:19 run_0018.dat.09-04-19_18h52m49s
-r--r--r-- 1 mugast Exxx 84M 9 avril 19:42 run_0019.dat.09-04-19_19h19m37s
-r--r--r-- 1 mugast Exxx 170M 9 avril 20:06 run_0020.dat.09-04-19_19h43m25s
-r--r--r-- 1 mugast Exxx 213M 9 avril 20:29 run_0021.dat.09-04-19_20h07m12s
-r--r--r-- 1 mugast Exxx 269M 9 avril 20:53 run_0022.dat.09-04-19_20h30m56s
Fixede744s Wed Apr 10 09:12:32 2019 AdrienOTHERGeneralN/AFolder for conversion
I setup the various folder for conversion in : /data/mugastX/e744/acquisition/

  • run : MFM run from GANIL daq (VAMOS+MUGAST)
  • MERGED_DATA : root run after merged from Agata
  • root_np : raw data converted using ganil2root Offline (MUGAST raw only)
  • np_output: tree analysed using nptool.
Fixede744s Thu Apr 11 11:26:52 2019 AdrienMUST2GeneralCH2TOF in MUST2 MM3 is now fixed
The E-TOF plot in MM3 was showing a 5MeV threshold.
After investigation the 12 strip was not disable on MM2 to MM4, and particularly noisy on MM3, killing the counts at small angle where most of the proton are.

After disabling the Strip 12 all 4 telescope show the same amount of statistics.

I added the Impact matrix and the E-DE plot for each of the forward telescope as well. Looks like the beam is not centered but shifted. Need more investigation.

The online need to be restarted to take this into account.
Attachment 1: ETOF_14N.png
ETOF_14N.png
Attachment 2: EDE_14N.png
EDE_14N.png
Attachment 3: Impact_14N.png
Impact_14N.png
Fixede793s Fri Jan 29 15:11:54 2021 AdrienVACUUMGeneralN/AMUGAST undervacuum and powered up
MUGAST is undervacuum thanks to Arnaud and Laurent.

I switch on all BT and HT. everything fine so far. Keeping the HV to check there is no trip on the silicon
Fixede793s Fri Feb 12 18:12:00 2021 AdrienS1HardwareN/AKapton change
Arnaud open today and change the Y Kapton (YA5) of the S1. Everything under vacuum/cooled again so I ran FSC, hopefully this will fix the issue we have with the Junction side.
Fixede793s Mon Mar 8 08:45:49 2021 AdrienOFFLINEGeneralN/ATO DO LIST for 8 march 2021
Here is a todo list for today:

Data conversion:
  • Raw run files are located in /data/mugastX/mugast/acquisition/run/
  • Converting FSC run: 622 to 629 : run_0630.dat.06-03-21_13h15m06s
  • Converting alpha run: 630. warning: there is 3 files for this run :run_0630.dat.06-03-21_13h15m06s and run_0630.dat.06-03-21_13h15m06s.1 and run_0630.dat.06-03-21_13h15m06s.2

Extract histogram for calibration: each macro need to be run twice, once for MUGAST and once for MUST2 if I remember correctly.
  • Extract histograms for FSC run with the macro located : /home/mugast/analysis/nptool/Projects/calibration/Time/ExtractRawHisto_T.C
  • Extract histograms for alpha run with the macro located : /home/mugast/analysis/nptool/Projects/calibration/Energy/ExtractRawHisto_E.C

Analysed the extracted histograms to calibrate: change the appropriate field in the macro before running
  • FSC: /home/mugast/analysis/nptool/Projects/calibration/Time/TimeCalibrator.C
  • alpha: /home/mugast/analysis/nptool/Projects/calibration/Energy/EnergyCalibrator.C

Prepare the calibration file to be used for the online/offline analysis:
  • List all the file you just generated in /home/mugast/analysis/nptool/Projects/MUGAST/Calibration.txt
  • Do some cleanup in the file so it is more readable.
  • Check for missing/noisy strips and adjust config file in /home/mugast/analysis/nptool/Projects/MUGAST/configs

Analysed the calibration run with the new calibration:
  • check T:strip and E:strip
  • Post a summary of the resolution for each detector

Time calibrator on all tac
  • Check the range of each tac
  • wired the start/stop to the TAC inputs
  • do an acquisition with enough statitics
  • analyse it and put the calibration file in Calibration.txt
Pinnede793s Tue Mar 9 09:35:18 2021 AdrienOTHERGeneralN/AE793s proposal
Attached is the proposal of the experiment.
Attachment 1: Proposal_K48_by_dp_MUGAST_FINAL.pdf
Proposal_K48_by_dp_MUGAST_FINAL.pdf
Pinnede793s Wed Mar 10 13:10:14 2021 AdrienBEAMGeneralCD2Kinematical line from Ti contamination
In black the Kinematical line for states known to be populated strongly in 47Ti(d,p).
In blue range of the states of interrest.

The contamination is in a different region and should not cause any issue.
Attachment 1: KineTiK.pdf
KineTiK.pdf
Attachment 2: Kine.cxx 
void AddTiStates(double E);

void Kine(){
  
  
 NPL::Reaction K("47K(d,p)48K@362");
  
 // K states
 auto g = K.GetKinematicLine3();
 g->SetLineColor(kAzure+7);
 g->SetLineWidth(3);
 g->Draw("ac");
 K.SetExcitationHeavy(4);
 g = K.GetKinematicLine3();
 g->SetLineColor(kAzure+7);
 g->SetLineWidth(2);
 g->SetLineStyle(1);
 g->Draw("c");

 AddTiStates(0); 

 AddTiStates(0); 
 AddTiStates(0.969); 
 AddTiStates(2.2292); 
 AddTiStates(2.419); 
 AddTiStates(3.223); 
 AddTiStates(3.332); 
 AddTiStates(3.622); 
 AddTiStates(4.388); 
 AddTiStates(4.458); 
 AddTiStates(4.719); 
 AddTiStates(4.852); 
 AddTiStates(5.151); 
   
  }

void AddTiStates(double E){
  
 NPL::Reaction Ti("47Ti(d,p)48Ti@362");
   // Ti states
 Ti.SetExcitationHeavy(E);
 auto g = Ti.GetKinematicLine3();
 g->SetLineWidth(1);
 g->SetLineStyle(2);
 g->Draw("c");


  
  }
Pendinge793s Thu Mar 11 11:14:04 2021 AdrienOFFLINEGeneralCD2TODO LIST for Offline analysis
Miscelanous
  • Cleanup branches in npanalysis (remove old vamos branch and add MW TDC ones)
  • Check the MW TDC, make an offset calibration to align them
  • Implement the calibration in the analysis and out a MW_T branch with all the time
  • Allow for multiplicity in EDC


A clean macro for offline analysis producing a standardise Tcanvas to be put in the elog:
  • Ex And Ex normalised with coinc gamma overlay (Tac conditions for both) Indicate the Sn on this plot.
  • Kinematic plot with kinematic all line overlay (add fonctions to add kine line for 47Kdp 47Tidp 47Kpp 47Kdd 47Kdt 47KCC)
  • Ex vs EDC
  • Ex vs ThetaLab
  • Gamma-Gamma


Angular distribution
  • Add a separate macro with gate on gamma to produce ThetaLab distribution for each states
  • Do a simulation and produce a Solid angle for the g.s. And apply it to the distribution
  • Overlay the ADWA calculation with appropriate scaling (on a reference angle bin to be chosen)
Fixede793s Fri Mar 12 08:58:09 2021 AdrienBEAMHardwareCD2Beam is stopped 8h55
Beam stopped to fix a leak on the accelerator. Intervention up to 4hours, maybe less.
Fixede793s Fri Mar 12 09:57:30 2021 AdrienOTHERSocialN/ALost phone in agata counting room
Someone lost his/her phone in the agata counting room. Pictures attached.
Attachment 1: 161C9D73-3ED8-49DE-A1EF-4ED9AA11C912.jpeg
161C9D73-3ED8-49DE-A1EF-4ED9AA11C912.jpeg
Fixede793s Fri Mar 12 10:52:46 2021 AdrienVAMOSHardwareN/AQ pole trip in vamos
Q-Pole tripped this night around 4am at the same time as the dipole but was switch on again only at 9am.
Pinnede793s Fri Mar 12 15:48:35 2021 AdrienRUNGeneralN/AVamos D and Q value and MW HV
Pinnede793s Fri Mar 12 15:50:12 2021 AdrienRUNGeneralN/AVamos D and Q value and MW HV
Attached are the value for D and Q pole of vamos in case they trip.
Also attached is the computer driving the HV of the focal plan.
Attachment 1: 1613EC0C-1F4A-4933-B90A-D98A37421BFF.jpeg
1613EC0C-1F4A-4933-B90A-D98A37421BFF.jpeg
Attachment 2: 4ACA3448-35FF-472C-977C-E642B4ADE6A6.jpeg
4ACA3448-35FF-472C-977C-E642B4ADE6A6.jpeg
Fixede793s Fri Mar 12 15:52:15 2021 AdrienRUNGeneralN/Ato do during run
Every 1-2h:

Online: take screen shot of
  • Impact Matrix (MM and MG)
  • E-TOF (MM and MG)
  • E-DE (MM and MG)
  • Raw Tac
  • MW TDC
  • Scaler

Check the Vamos Q and D value on the left computer in the VAMOS daq ROOM (next to inspection line)
Fixede793s Sat Mar 13 10:11:44 2021 AdrienOFFLINEGeneralCD2Offline analysis of run 51-61
Run 51 to 61 are converted and analysed.
I fixed the gamma/no gamma normalisation after binning change.

We clearly see :
a state at 2.5 MeV that decay directly to the g.s. and a state at around 5 MeV with a 3 gamma cascade.

To do list:
- Add an angle dist in AngDist.C macro for the states around 2MeV (you can remove the Ex plot)
- Put Logy in all the canvas for the angle dist;)
- create a new macro showing the EDC 1D histo gated on several sliding windows in Ex to see the the gamma peak changing height
- add arrow or line indication the gamma rays position on every plots
- build the level scheme based on this (there is a preliminary scheme posted earlier by Manu based on gamma-gamma).
Attachment 1: Plot51-61.png
Plot51-61.png
Attachment 2: Angle51-61.png
Angle51-61.png
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 130, 131, 132   Next  

ELOG Home Page