MUST2 SAMURAI_2018 S3-LEB-LPC SUPERNEMO MUGAST EXPAND SCALP GALATRON HiCARI VELO
  MUGAST, Page 10 of 132  Not logged in MUGAST
 Find |  Login 
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show all entries   2636 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 130, 131, 132   Next  
Status ExpNbr Date Authordown Type Category Target-Source Subject
Fixede744s Thu Apr 11 00:57:34 2019 iulianOTHERHardwareCH2CH2 target thickness
target CH2 104 um (2nd position)

Brho 14N6+ CATS2
Fixede744s Thu Apr 11 02:25:06 2019 iulianRUNGeneralCH2 target thicknesses measurement Online
Online measurement of the target thickness:
Run 58
Cats2 in -> Brho 14N7+=0.9148 Tm

Run 59
Cats2 in
CH2 target place 2 in
-> Brho 14N6+=0.7473 Tm
Thickness found 105.2 um


Run 60
Cats2 in
CH2 target place 3 in
-> Brho 14N6+=0.7754 Tm
-> Brho 14N5+=0.8924 Tm
Thickness found 91 um

Run 61
Cats2 in
C target place 4 in
-> Brho 14N6+=0.8118 Tm
Thickness foun 35.85

Run 62
Cats2 in
CH2 target place 5 in
-> Brho 14N6+=0.8023 Tm
Thickness found 76.2 um
Fixede744s Thu Apr 11 06:48:23 2019 iulianRUNHardwareCH2TO DO list

mugast wrote:
- 2 TACS are not working:
  • T_Si_CATS1 (stop should be CATS n FAG --> to be checked). Also Ok now. Same problem as below
  • T_Si_VAMOS (seen now in T_CATS1_CATS2) --> check the signals (if CATS is the START we should use CATS n FAG, if it is the stop it should be delayed by 800 ns , the delay is prepared)
    The was a broken Cable from the delay to fan in fan out.

    Still remains T_Vamos_Cats1 with no counts. I suspect the necesity to put a 2 us delay on Cats1, or to inverse it and pout Cats1 fag validated as start

Attachment 1: run275_tacs_mugast.png
run275_tacs_mugast.png
Fixede744s Thu Apr 11 07:00:17 2019 iulianBEAMGeneralCH2ToDo List and plan for today
To Do/Understand
1) T_Vamos_Cats1 in Mugast and T_FPMW_CATS2 in Vamos are not working. I suspect it is the same reason, meaning stop arrives before start. Longer delay or inverse putting Cats2-Fag validated.
2) MM3_E_TOF there is a 5 MeV threshold see below?

For today:
1) We give the beam back to them at 10 am.
2) Analyse the data from RUN 74 & 75 to see the excitation function for 1H(14N,p)
3) If we have the beam back, take more data merged with Agata. Intensity around 2e+5 pps to protect CATS2.
4) If Vamos/Mugast need debugging for reconstruction/validation they have priority.

Summary of the night :
1) Measured the target thicknesses for the targets: 1) Hole 2) CH2 105 um 3) CH2 100 um 4) C 70 um 5) CH2 73 um
2) The C target was not very homogeneous, meaning that was dramatically spreading the momentum distribution of the beam charge states.
3) Vamos debugging went forward, transmission was 95% with Cats2 in with 2e+4 pps beam intensity
4) At 4h30 started the statistic run with Vamos setted at a Brho of 0.437 Tm to completely remove 14N7+ and all others from the focal plane. The beam spot was about 50 mm pied a pied ... This makes imposible the use
Attachment 1: run275_tacs_mugast.png
run275_tacs_mugast.png
Fixede744s Thu Apr 11 17:38:28 2019 iulianRUNHardwareEmptySetting trigger Vamos and Cats
Removed division %40000 on Cats and %1000 on Vamos.

Removed Cats2 from the beam
Fixede744s Fri Apr 12 07:26:29 2019 iulianRUNGeneralCH2Run88
Please add all the spectra from the visualization into the elog and all the scales.... see runs before



OttoRun wrote:
*************************
Run : 88
*************************

Start at 2019-04-12 06:24:07.821497

Run Conditions:
  • Operator: Louis
  • Trigger: MG Backward, MG90, MUST2, CATS %1000 AGATA %100
  • Target/Source: CH2 target 2
  • Beam: 14O
  • Intensity: ~ 3e+4
  • Brho = 0.6912 Tm
  • !CATS/VAMOS (CATS Efficiency)! : XXXX

Comment:

Start Target 2: 104 um
VAMOS is closed.
Fixede744s Fri Apr 12 13:34:33 2019 iulianOTHERGeneralN/AE744 Status
1) Beam tuning during the night.
2) around 04h00 started runs at 4e+4
3) beam intensity decreased to 1e+4 @7h30 in the morning.
4) Vamos tuning at 8h
5) run low intensity at 12h30 et high intensity (1e+4) @13h.
6) @13h give the beam to PCP to increase the beam intensity. First IBE measurement
7) If beam I<5e+4 measure directly in Vamos
8) If beam I>5e+4 we have to cut in part the beam in Vamos or not use Vamos
Fixede744s Sat Apr 13 23:25:14 2019 iulianRUNGeneralN/AInconsistent info in the run message
This inconsistency has been addressed

Adrien Matta wrote:

Adrien Matta wrote:
Be careful to fill in correctly all info in the start run message.

There is inconsistency in run 121 comment (target 2) and list (target 3).

Thèse information will be used for the analysis.


--> Well.. in entry 4175 it is written target 3...
... ...
Fixede768s Thu Jul 18 19:40:11 2019 iulianOFFLINEGeneralLiFEx in 19F from run 72
Excitation energy spectra in 19F obtained by conditioning Z==9 and (A/Q*8-19)<0.3 in Vamos for
MG5
MG11
Trapezoidal detectors
All backward detectors
Attachment 1: mg5_19F_Ex_run72_0.png
mg5_19F_Ex_run72_0.png
Attachment 2: mg11_19F_Ex_run72_0.png
mg11_19F_Ex_run72_0.png
Attachment 3: allMugast_deToF_Q9_and8_19FVam_run72_0.png
allMugast_deToF_Q9_and8_19FVam_run72_0.png
Attachment 4: allBackward_deToF_Q9_and8_19FVam_run72_1.png
allBackward_deToF_Q9_and8_19FVam_run72_1.png
Fixed  Fri Jul 19 11:46:51 2019 iulianOFFLINEGeneralLiFOffline 112
Egamma vs M/Q*9 to check who is 19Ne
Ex in 19Ne all Mugast
Ex vs Egamma for 19Ne
Kinematics Lines drawn over Elab vs Tlab for 19Ne
Attachment 1: run112_Egamma_mM_Q.png
run112_Egamma_mM_Q.png
Attachment 2: run113_Ex_19Ne.png
run113_Ex_19Ne.png
Attachment 3: run112_Ex_Egamma_19Ne.png
run112_Ex_Egamma_19Ne.png
Attachment 4: run112_KinLines_19Ne.png
run112_KinLines_19Ne.png
Fixede744s Fri Apr 12 13:53:56 2019 diegoOTHERGeneral intervention
TAC FPMW_HF in VAMOS was still out of range for MUGAST physics
We increased the range from 1us to 2us and applied a delay of 200 ns to the stop of the TAC.
Fixede744s Fri Apr 12 19:44:09 2019 diegoVAMOSSoftware SetAlias script for VAMOS identification
Attachment 1: SetAlias.C 
char cond[1000];
TTree *t1;
void SetAlias()
{
  gStyle->SetPalette(1);

  t1 = (TTree*) gROOT->FindObject("AD")
;
  t1->SetAlias("fExist_DC_Y","DC0_Y>-1500&&DC1_Y>-1500&&DC2_Y>-1500&&DC3_Y>-1500"); 
  t1->SetAlias("fExist_IC","IC[0]>0&&IC[1]>0&&IC[2]>0&&IC[3]>0"); 

  t1->SetAlias("mT","(T_FPMW_CATS2_C*-1 + 305.3 + -4*(MWTVN==8)-1*(MWTVN==9)-1*(MWTVN==10)-2.2*(MWTVN==11)-0.7*(MWTVN==12)-0.5*(MWTVN==15)-0.6*(MWTVN==16)-1.1*(MWTVN==17)+0.6*(MWTVN==18)-1*(MWTVN==6)-0.5*(MWTVN==5)-0.5*(MWTVN==4)-1.5*(MWTVN==3))*(T_FPMW_CATS1_C>10)");
  t1->SetAlias("mD","D");
  t1->SetAlias("mV","(mD)/mT");
  t1->SetAlias("mBeta","mV/29.9792");
  t1->SetAlias("mGamma","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta*mBeta)");
  
  t1->SetAlias("mM_Q","Brho/3.107/mBeta/mGamma");
  t1->SetAlias("mM","(mE)/931.5016/(mGamma-1.)");
  t1->SetAlias("mMr","mM_Q*((13.*qmq13+14.*qmq14+15.*qmq15+16.*qmq16))"); 
  t1->SetAlias("mQ","mM/mM_Q");
 
  //t1->SetAlias("mT1","(T_FPMW_HF_C*-1. + 559. + 3*(MWTVN==8))*(T_FPMW_HF_C>10)");
  t1->SetAlias("mT1","1.5+((23.7593+1.03259*MWTV)*(MWTVN==0)+(-9.53168+1.0711*MWTV)*(MWTVN==1)+(-30.486+1.11554*MWTV)*(MWTVN==2)+(-31.1261+1.11624*MWTV)*(MWTVN==3)+(-62.99829+1.1569*MWTV)*(MWTVN==4)+(-47.9021+1.13413*MWTV)*(MWTVN==5)+(-14.3957+1.08086*MWTV)*(MWTVN==6)+(-24.6655+1.1058*MWTV)*(MWTVN==7)+(60.4375+0.981809*MWTV)*(MWTVN==8)+(4.44472+1.06168*MWTV)*(MWTVN==9)+(11.408+1.04492*MWTV)*(MWTVN==10)+(56.8282+0.990287*MWTV)*(MWTVN==11)+(59.6833+0.995356*MWTV)*(MWTVN==12)+(27.6344+1.02846*MWTV)*(MWTVN==13)+(6.02794+1.06554*MWTV)*(MWTVN==14)+(20.1561+1.0342*MWTV)*(MWTVN==15)+(51.0718+1.01008*MWTV)*(MWTVN==16)+(36.5605+1.0391*MWTV)*(MWTVN==17)+(-6.01158+1.09581*MWTV)*(MWTVN==18)+(37.6143+1.00939*MWTV)*(MWTVN==19)+(29.3289+1.01291*MWTV)*(MWTVN==20) + 3*83.4*(GATCONF_MASTER==8)-0*(GATCONF_MASTER==1)-2*83.4*(GATCONF_MASTER==4))");
  t1->SetAlias("mT1","540-2*T_FPMW_CATS2_C");
  t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[0]+IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3]+IC[4])*(IC[0]>0.1&&IC[1]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1&&IC[3]>0.1)");
  //  t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3])*(IC[1]>1&&IC[2]>1&&IC[3]>1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mdE0","IC[0]*(IC[0]>1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mdE1","IC[0]*(IC[0]>1)+IC[1]*(IC[1]>1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mD1","Path");
  t1->SetAlias("mV1","mD1/(mT1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mBeta1","mV1/29.9792");
  t1->SetAlias("mGamma1","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta1*mBeta1)");
  
  t1->SetAlias("mM_Q1","Brho/3.107/mBeta1/mGamma1");
  t1->SetAlias("mM1","1.3*(mE1)/931.5016/(mGamma1-1.)");
  t1->SetAlias("mMr","mM_Q*((13.*qmq13+14.*qmq14+15.*qmq15+16.*qmq16))"); 
  t1->SetAlias("mQ1","mM1/mM_Q1");
  t1->SetAlias("ProjD","-174.*1.");
  t1->SetAlias("Xt","TMW1_X+ProjD*tan(TP_Theta/1000.)");
  t1->SetAlias("Yt","TMW1_Y+ProjD*tan(TP_Phi/1000.)");

 
  t1->SetAlias("mT2","535.1-2*T_FPMW_CATS2_C-1.2*(MWTVN==11)-0.3*(MWTVN==12)-0.5*(MWTVN==10)-0.7*(MWTVN==9)-2.8*(MWTVN==8)+0.2*(MWTVN==7)-0.4*(MWTVN==5)-1.0*(MWTVN==4)-3.0*(MWTVN==3)-3.0*(MWTVN==2)-8.0*(MWTVN==1)");
 //t1->SetAlias("mT2","mT1-TMWT1_MWT2_C+31");
  //  t1->SetAlias("mT2","mT1-4.83");

  //t1->SetAlias("mD2","D-10.5/cos(TP_Theta/1000.)/cos(TP_Phi/1000.)");
  t1->SetAlias("mE2","1.42*(IC[0]+IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3]+0.3*IC[4])*(IC[0]>0.1&&IC[1]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1&&IC[3]>0.1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mdE2","(IC[0]+IC[1])*(IC[0]>0.1&&IC[1]>0.1)");
  //  t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3])*(IC[1]>1&&IC[2]>1&&IC[3]>1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mD2","Path");
  t1->SetAlias("mV2","mD2/(mT2)");
  t1->SetAlias("mBeta2","mV2/29.9792");
  t1->SetAlias("mGamma2","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta2*mBeta2)");
  
  t1->SetAlias("mM_Q2","Brho/3.107/mV2*29.9792");
  t1->SetAlias("mM2","(mE2)/931.5016/(mGamma2-1.)");
  t1->SetAlias("mQ2","mM2/mM_Q2");
  t1->SetAlias("mMrec","int(mQ2+0.5)*mM_Q2");
  
}
Fixedcom2019 Sat Apr 6 00:29:14 2019 clementOFFLINEGeneralCD2Experimental Kinematic Line from dp + gamma ?????
Triangle is 870 keV
Attachment 1: 20.png
20.png
Fixede744s Tue Apr 16 15:33:26 2019 beyhan, marion, dieterVAMOSGeneral VAMOS settings fo C run
Attachment 1: IMG_1643.jpg
IMG_1643.jpg
Fixede744s Tue Apr 16 01:01:42 2019 beyhan, louis, serge, OFFLINEGeneral different parameters evolution as function of intensity
Attachment 1: mM2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
mM2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 2: mM_Q2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
mM_Q2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 3: mM_Q2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131_zoom.pdf
mM_Q2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131_zoom.pdf
Attachment 4: mV2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
mV2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 5: mV2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131_zoom.pdf
mV2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131_zoom.pdf
Attachment 6: T_FPMW_CATS2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
T_FPMW_CATS2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Fixede744s Tue Apr 16 00:04:08 2019 beyhanOFFLINEGeneral ewire evolution vs beam intensity (normalized to CATS intensity)
Attachment 1: EWIRE0_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
EWIRE0_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 2: EWIRE1_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
EWIRE1_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 3: EWIRE2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
EWIRE2_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Attachment 4: EWIRE3_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
EWIRE3_change_122_vs_130_vs_131.pdf
Fixede768s Fri Jul 19 14:44:30 2019 adrienOTHERHardwareLiFThe diamond detector is not behaving properly
On the image attached we can see the counting rate of the diamond (Red) going up linearly while Vamos (blue) staty stables.
This is understood as the diamond's graphite impurities charging up with the beam, so the baseline is moving up and we trigger more and more on noise. At some point I expect the counting rate to start dropping as the detector is no longer polarized.
Attachment 1: dimaond_is_not_working.png
dimaond_is_not_working.png
Fixede793s Sat Mar 6 13:10:07 2021 adrienONLINEGeneralN/AFSC screen shot of online at end of run
every detetector have time on either X or Y except for MM5, which is at 90deg and used for elastic, so not a deal breaker.
Attachment 1: FSC5-6march.png
FSC5-6march.png
Fixede793s Thu Mar 11 09:04:38 2021 adrienONLINEGeneralCD2Elastic scattering in MM5
looking at E vs strip number in MM5 we see clearly the pp and dd elastic scattering.
Attachment 1: run53_mm5_elastic.png
run53_mm5_elastic.png
Fixede793s Thu Mar 11 04:34:58 2021 ablaihan, louisCATSHardwareCD2CATS and VAMOS tripped
at 4h15 CATS and VAMOS tripped probably due to too high beam intensity (~1.2x10^6 pps). We switched them on again at 4h30. All the 6 CATS in Board2 in HV by 525 V instead of 530 V.

We did not stop the run to not risk to crash the RCC. Events btw 4h15 and 4h30 will therefore have no time.
Attachment 1: Scaler_run53_4h30.png
Scaler_run53_4h30.png
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 130, 131, 132   Next  

ELOG Home Page