MUST2 SAMURAI_2018 S3-LEB-LPC SUPERNEMO MUGAST EXPAND SCALP GALATRON HiCARI VELO
  MUGAST, Page 10 of 132  Not logged in MUGAST
Status ExpNbr Date Author Type Category Target-Source Subjectdown
Fixede793s Fri Mar 12 23:54:52 2021 julien, nishu, FaïrouzVAMOSHardwareCD2Vamos tripped @ 23h35 & fixed
Fixede793s Sat Mar 13 10:14:16 2021 Lynda, Laetitia, ChloeVAMOSGeneral Vamos tripped @ 10:10 & fixed
Vamos tripped around 10:10. we switched back 3 HV on
Online spectra reset to check
Attachment 1: run62_scaler_9h16.png
run62_scaler_9h16.png
Fixede793s Sun Mar 14 06:25:33 2021 Léo, Serge, NishuVAMOSHardwareCD2Vamos tripped @ 06:20
the dipole tripped and the it had to be reset.(2mn)
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 10:01:13 2019 Fairouz Nikola Marion Kseniia Damien Chloe Marlene RUNGeneralCH2Vamos information & scalers run 126

Target CH2 # 3

Tension sur le finger est passée de 800 à 860V (Le plastique est entrain de se dégrader). Sur le run précédent, on avait 50% d'efficacité
Attachment 1: Vamos-run126.jpg
Vamos-run126.jpg
Attachment 2: run126_1_scalers_1.png
run126_1_scalers_1.png
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 14:14:30 2019 Damien, Faïrouz, Nikola, Iulian, and allVAMOSHardwareCH2Vamos efficiency 128_0
============================================================
offline/root_vamos/run_0128_0.root
============================================================
Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow
min 6121454382240790744
max 6142695442716936919
delta 21241060476146175
delta 0.899174 hours EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT
1hour==23622862570130036



=========================================================
i... HOUR: 2
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 95.3578%
IC 1 94.7752%
IC 2 93.7521%
IC 3 84.5044%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 95.8621%
IC 2 92.7939%
IC 3 90.8884%
IC 4 75.8709%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 79.3846%
DC WIRE 1 79.6441%
DC WIRE 2 77.023%
DC WIRE 3 86.1461%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 70.0453%
DCX1 70.2288%
DCX2 73.962%
DCX3 73.4596%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 55.4843%
----------------------------
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 12:39:45 2019 Damien, Faïrouz, Nikola, ChloeVAMOSHardwareCH2Vamos efficiency 126_0
============================================================
offline/root_vamos/run_0126_0.root
============================================================
Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow
min 6044607029673192529
max 6099422846027103291
delta 54815816353910762
delta 2.32046 hours EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT
1hour==23622862570130036



=========================================================
i... HOUR: 2
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 96.7464%
IC 1 96.195%
IC 2 95.0729%
IC 3 90.8458%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 96.577%
IC 2 93.1471%
IC 3 92.8727%
IC 4 77.8258%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 89.9857%
DC WIRE 1 90.1753%
DC WIRE 2 88.9825%
DC WIRE 3 91.4837%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 80.2862%
DCX1 80.554%
DCX2 81.4424%
DCX3 80.9388%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 69.2966%
----------------------------

=========================================================
i... HOUR: 4
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 96.3578%
IC 1 95.8225%
IC 2 94.7669%
IC 3 90.2217%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 96.3945%
IC 2 92.9317%
IC 3 92.8085%
IC 4 77.0803%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 88.9658%
DC WIRE 1 89.1277%
DC WIRE 2 87.8247%
DC WIRE 3 91.1065%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 79.7514%
DCX1 79.8534%
DCX2 81.2733%
DCX3 80.5688%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 68.6832%
----------------------------
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 10:00:01 2019 Damien, Faïrouz, Marion, Nikola, ChloeVAMOSHardwareCH2Vamos efficiency 125_3
============================================================
offline/root_vamos/run_0125_3.root
============================================================
Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow
min 5980684532772760498
max 6035549811431777728
delta 54865278659017230
delta 2.32255 hours EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT
1hour==23622862570130036



=========================================================
i... HOUR: 2
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 93.8234%
IC 1 95.1865%
IC 2 94.5027%
IC 3 95.5314%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 95.149%
IC 2 94.3407%
IC 3 92.1441%
IC 4 91.1351%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 91.4023%
DC WIRE 1 91.6532%
DC WIRE 2 90.9524%
DC WIRE 3 92.8162%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 83.6933%
DCX1 83.806%
DCX2 84.7628%
DCX3 84.1369%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 75.6488%
----------------------------

=========================================================
i... HOUR: 4
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 93.7978%
IC 1 94.9705%
IC 2 94.3827%
IC 3 95.5307%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 94.9805%
IC 2 94.2557%
IC 3 92.3397%
IC 4 91.1041%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 91.1868%
DC WIRE 1 91.5362%
DC WIRE 2 90.7708%
DC WIRE 3 92.6096%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 83.2471%
DCX1 83.3106%
DCX2 84.4269%
DCX3 83.8282%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 75.2358%
----------------------------
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 08:04:57 2019 Damien, Faïrouz, Marion, Nikola, Magda, ChloeVAMOSHardwareCH2Vamos efficiency 125_2
root [1] .x macros/EffCheck.C
============================================================
offline/root_vamos/run_0125_2.root
============================================================
Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow
min 5863695982673993501
max 5980684342752423366
delta 116988360078429865
delta 4.95234 hours EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT
1hour==23622862570130036



=========================================================
i... HOUR: 2
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 93.6426%
IC 1 94.9514%
IC 2 94.236%
IC 3 95.3632%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 94.9887%
IC 2 94.1585%
IC 3 92.2933%
IC 4 91.1857%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 90.3209%
DC WIRE 1 90.5349%
DC WIRE 2 89.6769%
DC WIRE 3 92.0875%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 82.5181%
DCX1 82.5673%
DCX2 83.8364%
DCX3 83.2371%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 74.3266%
----------------------------

=========================================================
i... HOUR: 4
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 93.6958%
IC 1 95.1799%
IC 2 94.364%
IC 3 95.4763%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 95.1955%
IC 2 94.192%
IC 3 92.2522%
IC 4 91.1886%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 80.6246%
DC WIRE 1 91.1635%
DC WIRE 2 90.6276%
DC WIRE 3 92.7532%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 75.4916%
DCX1 83.2325%
DCX2 84.5392%
DCX3 83.9668%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 75.0976%
----------------------------

=========================================================
i... HOUR: 6
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 93.6071%
IC 1 95.0734%
IC 2 94.4539%
IC 3 95.4969%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 95.0629%
IC 2 94.3913%
IC 3 92.3024%
IC 4 91.0992%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 90.7973%
DC WIRE 1 91.0359%
DC WIRE 2 90.2009%
DC WIRE 3 92.3901%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 82.8318%
DCX1 82.8058%
DCX2 84.1176%
DCX3 83.4456%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 74.598%
----------------------------
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 08:03:21 2019 Damien, Faïrouz, Marion, Nikola, Magda, ChloeVAMOSHardwareCH2Vamos efficiency 125_1
============================================================
offline/root_vamos/run_0125_1.root
============================================================
Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow
min 5746770055864367227
max 5863695806444869427
delta 116925750580502200
delta 4.94969 hours EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT
1hour==23622862570130036



=========================================================
i... HOUR: 2
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.8817%
IC 1 93.7508%
IC 2 93.7311%
IC 3 95.1744%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 94.0511%
IC 2 93.8309%
IC 3 92.2092%
IC 4 91.0936%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 89.4525%
DC WIRE 1 89.7361%
DC WIRE 2 88.5778%
DC WIRE 3 91.8895%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 81.5167%
DCX1 81.582%
DCX2 83.2556%
DCX3 82.6822%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 73.0483%
----------------------------

=========================================================
i... HOUR: 4
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 93.5228%
IC 1 94.6339%
IC 2 93.9874%
IC 3 95.4575%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 94.7737%
IC 2 93.8565%
IC 3 92.1359%
IC 4 90.954%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 91.8457%
DC WIRE 1 92.0115%
DC WIRE 2 91.5439%
DC WIRE 3 93.092%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 84.3472%
DCX1 84.4979%
DCX2 85.3878%
DCX3 84.6455%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 77.242%
----------------------------

=========================================================
i... HOUR: 6
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 93.495%
IC 1 94.9419%
IC 2 94.1014%
IC 3 95.3682%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 95.0332%
IC 2 94.0664%
IC 3 92.2387%
IC 4 91.1616%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 90.4443%
DC WIRE 1 90.6191%
DC WIRE 2 89.7514%
DC WIRE 3 92.212%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 82.5449%
DCX1 82.4591%
DCX2 83.8987%
DCX3 83.2895%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 74.4466%
----------------------------
Fixede744s Mon Apr 15 01:57:08 2019 iulian Jaromir ValerianVAMOSHardwareN/AVamos efficiency 125_0
to obtain it:
>lpcgrit
>npp mugast
>root offline/root_vamos/run_xxx.root
root [1] .L macros/EffCheck.C
root [2] EffChechk()
================== Time split version of scripts: ~/analysis/nptool/Projects/MUGAST/macros/EffCheck.C
==== guesses an hour length, works for 122, 125
==== see the output bellow
==== modified code in attachment

Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.7121%
IC 1 93.4805%
IC 2 93.6874%
IC 3 95.111%
----------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.7834%
IC 2 93.8809%
IC 3 92.1641%
IC 4 91.0911%
----------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 89.3256%
DC WIRE 1 89.5065%
DC WIRE 2 88.2744%
DC WIRE 3 91.7775%
----------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 81.3829%
DCX1 81.3837%
DCX2 83.0758%
DCX3 82.449%
----------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 72.9503%
----------------------



root [3] .x macros/EffCheck.C
============================================================
offline/root_vamos/run_0125_0.root
============================================================
Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow
min 5645191654671913001
max 5746769951007854244
delta 101578296335941243
delta 4.3 hours EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT
1hour==23622862570130036



=========================================================
i... HOUR: 2
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.9316%
IC 1 93.7101%
IC 2 93.8214%
IC 3 95.3857%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.9656%
IC 2 93.9186%
IC 3 92.1004%
IC 4 91.0845%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 90.7057%
DC WIRE 1 90.8913%
DC WIRE 2 89.7104%
DC WIRE 3 92.1789%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 82.8504%
DCX1 82.9172%
DCX2 84.0074%
DCX3 83.3231%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 74.9742%
----------------------------

=========================================================
i... HOUR: 4
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.6848%
IC 1 93.4008%
IC 2 93.6383%
IC 3 94.9419%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.6902%
IC 2 93.8594%
IC 3 92.1954%
IC 4 91.0825%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 88.811%
DC WIRE 1 89.0412%
DC WIRE 2 87.7612%
DC WIRE 3 91.4577%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 80.8638%
DCX1 80.7706%
DCX2 82.6961%
DCX3 82.0982%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 72.2419%
----------------------------

=========================================================
i... HOUR: 6
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 92.3355%
IC 1 93.4695%
IC 2 93.5595%
IC 3 95.0589%
----------------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 93.8846%
IC 2 93.8857%
IC 3 92.1605%
IC 4 91.2521%
----------------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC WIRE 0 88.2688%
DC WIRE 1 88.3611%
DC WIRE 2 87.006%
DC WIRE 3 91.6316%
----------------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 79.9095%
DCX1 80.0215%
DCX2 82.2048%
DCX3 81.5886%
----------------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 71.1065%
----------------------------
root [4]
Attachment 1: EffCheck.C

void chkef( ULong64_t low, ULong64_t high,   ULong64_t n ){
  cout<<endl;
  cout<< "=========================================================\n" ;
  cout<<"i... HOUR: "<<n<<endl; //"     "<<low<<" "<<high<<endl;
  string sep = "----------------------------\n" ;



  TTree *t1 = (TTree*) gROOT->FindObject("AD");

  TH1F * hc = new TH1F("hc","hc",2000,0.1,50);
  TH1F * ht = new TH1F("ht","ht",2000,0.1,50);


  TString cond=  Form("(((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)>=%lld)&&(((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)<%lld)",low,high);
  TString condad=Form("&&( (((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)>=%lld)&&(((RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS)<%lld) )",low,high);


  // cout<<cond<<endl<<condad<<endl;


      cout << "Forward (condition by before)" << endl; 
  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>ht",i+1),cond.Data() ,"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>hc",i+1),Form("IC[%d]>0.1 %s",i,condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "IC " << i << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }

  cout << sep ;


  cout << "Backward  (condition by after)" << endl; 

  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>ht",i),cond.Data() ,"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[%d]>>hc",i),Form("IC[%d]>0.1 %s",i+1,  condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "IC " << i+1 << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }
cout << sep ;

 cout << "DC  (condition by IC[0])" << endl; 

  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>ht"),cond.Data(),"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>hc"),Form("EWIRE_%d>100 %s",i, condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "DC WIRE " << i << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }
cout << sep ;

cout << "DC X  (condition by IC[0])" << endl; 

  for(int i =0; i<4;i++)
    {
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>ht"),cond.Data(),"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>hc"),Form("DC%d_X>-1500  %s",i, condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "DCX" << i << " " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;

    }

cout << sep ;


cout << "Xf  (condition by IC[0])" << endl; 

      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>ht"),cond.Data() ,"goff");
      t1->Draw(Form("IC[0]>>hc"),Form("Xf>-1500 %s", condad.Data() ),"goff");
      cout << "Xf " << hc->Integral()/ht->Integral()*100. << "%"<< endl;


cout << sep ;


 delete hc;
 delete ht;
}



/*
ORIGINAL NAME but  now the original code for VAMOS eff is above
 */
void EffCheck()
{

  ULong64_t hour;
  ULong64_t LTSmin=-1;
  ULong64_t LTSmax=-1;
  ULong64_t LTS,VTS,RTS, tmin,tmax,tmp;
 
  cout<< "============================================================\n" ;
  cout<<"          "<<gFile->GetName()<<endl;
  cout<< "============================================================\n" ;


  cout<<"Looking for min and max time stamp... very slow"<<endl;
  TTree *tree= (TTree*)gDirectory->Get("AD");
  tree->SetBranchAddress("LTS",&LTS);
  tree->SetBranchAddress("VTS",&VTS);
  tree->SetBranchAddress("RTS",&RTS);
  
  
 for (int i=1;i<tree->GetEntries();i++){
   tree->GetEntry(i);
   tmp=(RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS;
   if ((LTS>0)&&(tmp>1e+14)){  //================== kill some low values?
     if ((LTSmin>tmp) || (LTSmin==-1)){
       LTSmin=tmp;
     }
     if ((LTSmax<tmp) || (LTSmax==-1)){
       LTSmax=tmp;
     }
   }
 }


 //tree->Draw("(RTS<<32)+(VTS<<16)+LTS>>h(10000)","","");
 //  Long64_t LTSmin=AD->GetV1()[0];
 //  AD->Draw("RTS<<32+VTS<<16+LTS","LTS>0","goff", 1, AD->GetEntries()-1 );
 //  Long64_t LTSmax=AD->GetV1()[0];
 cout<<"min    "<<LTSmin<<" "<<endl;
 cout<<"max    "<<LTSmax<<" "<< endl;
 cout<<"delta  "<<LTSmax-LTSmin<<endl;
 cout<<"delta  "<<(LTSmax-LTSmin)/100/1e+6/3600/282162*4.3<<" hours  EMPIRICAL RUN LENGHT"<<endl;
 hour=143567947269965277/6.0775;
 cout<<"1hour=="<<hour<<endl<<endl<<endl;
 //==========================================================================================

 ULong64_t n=0;
 int hourstep=2;
 for (ULong64_t i=LTSmin; i<LTSmax; i+=hour*hourstep){
   n=n+1;
   chkef( i, i+hour , n*hourstep);
 }

  return NULL;




}
Fixede744s Sat Apr 13 20:16:05 2019 DiegoVAMOSGeneral Vamos Efficiency
***************************************RUN 118************************************************

Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 95.6667%
IC 1 95.4542%
IC 2 95.513%
IC 3 93.2396%
----------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 95.9352%
IC 2 94.2267%
IC 3 96.2866%
IC 4 83.0393% //not reliable
----------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC 0 93.0557%
DC 1 92.6187%
DC 2 88.9858%
DC 3 96.6774%
----------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 93.707%
DCX1 93.0192%
DCX2 94.2166%
DCX3 94.1586%
----------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 95.0046%
----------------------


***************************************RUN 119************************************************
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 95.2904%
IC 1 95.071%
IC 2 94.9271%
IC 3 93.1055%
----------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 95.0696%
IC 2 91.6524%
IC 3 90.644%
IC 4 81.9769% //not reliable
----------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC 0 90.7155%
DC 1 90.3863%
DC 2 87.0165%
DC 3 94.7584%
----------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 88.1504%
DCX1 87.6396%
DCX2 88.7515%
DCX3 88.2139%
----------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 83.22%
----------------------

***************************************RUN 122_0************************************************

Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 95.2443%
IC 1 95.2177%
IC 2 94.8111%
IC 3 92.0637%
----------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 95.3114%
IC 2 91.8716%
IC 3 90.9907%
IC 4 79.8954% //not reliable
----------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC 0 87.9765%
DC 1 87.8112%
DC 2 83.8229%
DC 3 93.3538%
----------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 86.4654%
DCX1 86.8069%
DCX2 87.0654%
DCX3 86.5511%
----------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 80.1623%
----------------------

***************************************RUN 122_1************************************************
Forward (condition by before)
IC 0 94.9153%
IC 1 94.9217%
IC 2 94.5962%
IC 3 91.8891%
----------------------
Backward (condition by after)
IC 1 95.0787%
IC 2 91.7874%
IC 3 91.1441%
IC 4 79.9685% //not reliable
----------------------
DC (condition by IC[0])
DC 0 87.4807%
DC 1 87.3732%
DC 2 83.3638%
DC 3 92.8772%
----------------------
DC X (condition by IC[0])
DCX0 85.8206%
DCX1 86.2137%
DCX2 86.5489%
DCX3 85.9571%
----------------------
Xf (condition by IC[0])
Xf 79.0635%
----------------------

There is a continuous decrease of efficiency in the Drift Chamber. The efficiency of IC is also not optimal. I suspect that with this beam intensity (5x10^4 in VAMOS) detectors may start to suffer some damage. If the efficiency keeps decreasing we need to consider to reduce the beam intensity.

In order to check the efficiency, there is a script in /home/mugast/Analysis_e744 called EffCheck.C

Open a root file: root -l RootA/r0XXX_XXXa.root
Load the script: .L EffCheck.C
Launch the script: EffCheck() (the calculation is automatic)
Pinnede793s Fri Mar 12 15:48:35 2021 AdrienRUNGeneralN/AVamos D and Q value and MW HV
Pinnede793s Fri Mar 12 15:50:12 2021 AdrienRUNGeneralN/AVamos D and Q value and MW HV
Attached are the value for D and Q pole of vamos in case they trip.
Also attached is the computer driving the HV of the focal plan.
Attachment 1: 1613EC0C-1F4A-4933-B90A-D98A37421BFF.jpeg
1613EC0C-1F4A-4933-B90A-D98A37421BFF.jpeg
Attachment 2: 4ACA3448-35FF-472C-977C-E642B4ADE6A6.jpeg
4ACA3448-35FF-472C-977C-E642B4ADE6A6.jpeg
Fixede744s Sun Apr 14 12:11:52 2019 Valerian and IulianOFFLINESoftwareCH2VERY VERY preliminary results Gamma-p
Around 8-10 events are found in the good energy vs Brho region and Si_T vs Si_E region for the gamma emission.

Joined are :

- the cut done for Energy vs Brho
- the "good" Events plotted on the Si_E vs Si_T spectra for each telescope.


one can see that most events are in, or close to the punch through but some of them ~8-10 are not -> very good candidates for proton after gamma emission
Attachment 1: EPCM_Brho_gamma.png
EPCM_Brho_gamma.png
Attachment 2: PossiblePafterGamma_ToF.png
PossiblePafterGamma_ToF.png
Attachment 3: Epcm_gamma.png
Epcm_gamma.png
Fixede793s Fri Mar 12 22:31:46 2021 julien, nishuVAMOSHardwareCD2VAMOS tripped @ ~ 22:24 ans again ~ 22:45
back again to normal after restarting the HV
(22:39)
Attachment 1: vamos_nc.png
vamos_nc.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2021-03-12_22-33-47.png
Screenshot_from_2021-03-12_22-33-47.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2021-03-12_22-47-38.png
Screenshot_from_2021-03-12_22-47-38.png
Fixede793s Fri Mar 12 22:26:55 2021 julien, nishuVAMOSHardwareCD2VAMOS tripped @ ~ 22:24
back again to normal,
Fixede793s Fri Mar 12 03:21:01 2021 Taras, Chloe, NIshu, CharlieVAMOSGeneralCD2VAMOS trip, requires help (FIXED @ 03:55)
We received a call from PCP telling us that VAMOS has tripped. Currents on all focal planes are 0. We tried stopping and restarting the FP_CATS0 - FP_CATS5, but this does not resolve the issue.

A picture of the VAMOS control screen is attached. Diego has been contacted.

EDIT:::
Diego has informed us that the focal plane current is not the issue. The problem instead is with G1.G.D4.P (dipole?) in VAMOS. This has tripped off (see second attached image). He has advised us to call Bertrand to fix this.

EDIT2:::
Bertrand called an operator, and the VAMOS count rate is now back up to normal. The whole process from crash to fix took ~half an hour
Attachment 1: PXL_20210312_020550869.jpg
PXL_20210312_020550869.jpg
Attachment 2: PXL_20210312_024401845.jpg
PXL_20210312_024401845.jpg
Fixede793s Thu Mar 11 02:50:14 2021 Ablaihan, LouisBEAMGeneralCD2VAMOS transmition
at 2h50 beam intensity reached 1.1x10^6 pps in CATS for 6.5x10^5 pps in VAMOS. The transmition decreased to 60% without any shift of the beam position. Does it come from a loss of efficiency of VAMOS at high counting rate?
Documentse744s Tue Apr 16 12:15:28 2019 BeyhanOTHERGeneral VAMOS settings for C run
Fixede744s Tue Apr 16 15:33:26 2019 beyhan, marion, dieterVAMOSGeneral VAMOS settings fo C run
Attachment 1: IMG_1643.jpg
IMG_1643.jpg

ELOG Home Page