Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 00:38:38 2018, e744 all night shift teams, (edit) Valérie, RUN, General, CH2, Run 2010 20x
|
RUN 2010
Date : 26/05/2018 00:37:44
Target n°5 CH2 100 µm
140 all triggers except LISE
TRIGGER entry for CATS IN7 (Gatconf =64).
divisions EXL 10**4
PPT 3000
CATS 3 10**4
--------------------------------------------------
thresholds on all MUST2 : 1 MeV
pedestals CsI (high thr, haut seuil) 8210 ; (low thr, bas seuil) 8160
check GMT chronogramme GMT Master Val 2.5 µs.
- - - - - - - - - -
cf MM impacts at 00h53:Run2010_impactMM_14O_26may.png
1h18 Run2010MMimpactStatat1h18.pngand at 1h53 Run2010MMimpactStatat1h53.png
Signed by shift team, Iulan, Valérian, Valérie
-----------------------------
Missing strips:
x
MM1 1
MM2 5
MM3 0
MM4 2
MM5 0
y:
MM1 3
MM2 1
MM3 0
MM4 6
MM5 3 |
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 01:41:19 2018, e744 night shift team, edit valérie, DAQ, General, CH2, summary GMT, DAS config since run2005
|
Triggers: all except LISE
IN1 to IN5 : MM1 to MM5;
IN7: CATS
IN10: PPt; IN11: EXL
(IN13:LISE not in the trigger)
DIV CATS = 3. 10**4
DIV EXL = 10**4
DIV PPT= 3000
divisions EXL
PPT
CATS 3 10**4
--------------------------------------------------
thresholds on all MUST2 : 1 MeV
pedestals CsI (high thr, haut seuil) 8210 ; (low thr, bas seuil) 8160
Run 14O check GMT chronogramme GMT Master Val 2.5 µs. chronoGMTmasterRun14O.png
GMT slave chronogramGMTslave_Run14O.png |
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 02:39:18 2018, Mihai, Pedja, RUN, General, CH2, Run 2011, Target n°5 9x
|
RUN 2011
Date : 26/05/2018
Beam used: 14O
Start: 2h26
Stop: 4h21
-----------------------------
Missing strips:
x
MM1 1
MM2 6
MM3 0
MM4 2
MM5 0
y:
MM1 3
MM2 1
MM3 0
MM4 7
MM5 3.5 |
|
Ongoing, e744, Sat May 26 03:23:46 2018, Valerian, OFFLINE, General, CH2, 15O excitation function as a function of ThetaLab
|
|
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 04:24:16 2018, Mihai, Pedja, RUN, General, CH2, Run 2012, Target n°5
|
RUN 2012
Date : 26/05/2018
Beam used: 14O
Start: 4h23
Stop: 4h57
suspect the target is too thick, low resonances seen... run stopped in order to check it.
-----------------------------
Missing strips:
x
MM1 1
MM2 6
MM3 0
MM4 2
MM5 0
y:
MM1 3
MM2 1
MM3 0
MM4 7
MM5 3 |
|
Ongoing, e744, Sat May 26 05:02:42 2018, Valerian, TARGET, General, CH2, Problem with the target for run 2004 and 2010
|
The target seems identical between the two runs... We will have to investigate to understand what is going on.
The decision is to change the target 5 for the target 4 104um from georges.
The two spectras from run 2003 (target nr6) and 2010 (target nr 5) are identical. The peak at low energy correspond to the first excited state in 15F.
In the picture, target N°4 is written 104 µm
N°5 100 µm GoodFellow
N°6 187µm |
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 05:16:12 2018, Iulian Valerian, pedja, mihai, TARGET, General, CH2, Target change
|
| Target No 4 is placed in-beam 5h15. |
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 05:23:12 2018, Mihai, Pedja, RUN, General, CH2, Run 2013, Target n°4
|
RUN 2013
Date : 26/05/2018
Beam used: 14O
Start: 5h18
Stop: 5h48
-----------------------------
Missing strips:
x
MM1 1
MM2 6
MM3 0
MM4 2
MM5 0
y:
MM1 3
MM2 1
MM3 0
MM4 7
MM5 3 |
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 05:51:00 2018, Mihai, Pedja, RUN, General, CH2, Run 2014, Target n°4 9x
|
RUN 2014
Date : 26/05/2018
Beam used: 14O
Start: 5h50
Stop: 7h19
Stopped, because no beam due to a vacuum problem on CSS1
-----------------------------
Missing strips:
x
MM1 1
MM2 6
MM3 0
MM4 2
MM5 0
y:
MM1 3
MM2 1
MM3 0
MM4 7
MM5 3 |
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 06:05:13 2018, Iulian Valerian Pedjia, TARGET, General, CH2, Target issue No5
|
In the attached figure it could be seen that with the target No5 (run 2010) lower energy resonances were visible (lower part of the figure), which is not the case with the target No4 (upper part)from run 2013.
GOODFELLOW or mounting error? |
|
Ongoing, e744, Sat May 26 07:03:12 2018, Valerian and Iulian and Francois, OFFLINE, General, CH2, First picture for 15F from runs 2010-2013
|
Target -> Thick target (Sandwich target ??)
The predictions are different....
At large angles, the 5/2+ peak (at 2.78 MeV) is cut because it goes to lower energies in lab. If the background at 4 MeV is normalized to the one at 0°, there is no very broad-resonance at high energy in large angles. |
|
, , Sat May 26 07:20:03 2018, , , , ,
|
|
|
Ongoing, e744, Sat May 26 07:32:17 2018, Valerian, pedja, mihai, RUN, General, CH2, Run 2015 after vacuum problem of Css1 target 4
|
Run 2015
26/05/18
start @7h29
stop @9h42 |
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 09:33:48 2018, Giuseppe, Dieter, RUN, General, CH2, run 2015
|
Missing strips:
x
MM1 1
MM2 6
MM3 0
MM4 2
MM5 0
y:
MM1 3
MM2 1
MM3 0
MM4 7
MM5 3
 |
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 10:03:37 2018, Giuseppe, Dieter, RUN, General, , run 2016& 2017
|
Problems with the ACQ (merger), they were solved by making Breakup and Init
run2016 start@9:45 stop @9:47 (bad run)
run2017 start@9:48 stop @9:49 (bad run) |
|
Ongoing, e744, Sat May 26 10:06:06 2018, Giuseppe, Dieter, RUN, General, CH2, Run 2018
|
Run 2018
Start @ 09:56 26/05/2018
Stop @ 10:51 |
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 11:19:37 2018, Giuseppe, Dieter, RUN, General, CH2, interruption due to to waterleak ibn CSS1
|
10:50 h Water leak at CSS1
cryo pumps have to be regenerated
continuation until the expert intervention starts is possible
presently waiting for resubmission of the beam
11:40 h started new run (run2019 - see next entry)
11:43 h another leak occurred and it was decided to stop the beam, data taking continues |
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 11:42:03 2018, Giuseppe, Dieter, RUN, General, CH2, run 2019
|
Run 2019
start@ 11:40 26/05/2018
stop @ 11:52
the beam intensity dropped to 22 pps so we stopped |
|
Pending, e744, Sat May 26 13:22:08 2018, Francois, BEAM, General, , problem with CSS1
|
There is a leakage of water in cavity north of cyclotron CSS1. I discussed with Alain Savale.
There are 2 options:
1) We take the beam as it is, probably deteriorated, with a lower intensity. There is a risk of break up in CSS1. The vacuum of the cavity is maintained probably by a small piece of ice only.
2) They can make a new setting of CSS1, using only one acceleration cavity (south). They would stop the north cavity and reduce the water pressure. In this case the beam is also deteriorated.
Decision:
We chose option 1 and we will observe the stability of the vacuum in CSS1 in time. If the stability is bad, vacuum too bad, later in the day they will decide to go to option 2. This means several hours without beam (may be a few hours). |
|
Fixed, e744, Sat May 26 14:03:27 2018, Giuseppe, Dieter, J. Eric, RUN, General, CH2, Run 2020 9x
|
run 2020
start@ 14:02 26/05/2018
stop @ 15:20 26/05/2018
Missing strips:
x
MM1 1
MM2 6
MM3 0
MM4 2
MM5 0
y:
MM1 3
MM2 1
MM3 0
MM4 7
MM5 3 |
|