MUST2 SAMURAI_2018 S3-LEB-LPC SUPERNEMO MUGAST EXPAND SCALP GALATRON HiCARI VELO
  MUGAST, Page 41 of 132  Not logged in MUGAST
Fixed, e768s, Mon Jul 29 18:59:51 2019, OttoRun, RUN, General, LiF, Run158 
*************************
Run : 158
*************************

Start at 2019-07-29 18:59:00.751661

15O beam

Brho = 0.556 Tm

target LiF thick number 1

OR VAMOS 474
OR Mugast 106
Fag 133

beam intensity XX

TRIGGERS:
MG BACK
MG 90
MUST2
VAMOS%10
BF2%100


restart after VAMOS optimization

Stop at 2019-07-30 11:04:58.183397
Stop comment: changing AGATA 01B parameter file
Fixed, e768s, Mon Jul 29 19:49:19 2019, Freddy, Sylvain, Nicolas, BEAM, General, LiF, Run 158 : Beam profile after beam tuning index.jpgscaler_1.png
Below is the beam profile and the scaler corresponding to the beam after optimisation

Edit : beam intensity is strongly fluctuating : current intensity is 2 10⁶
Fixed, e768s, Mon Jul 29 22:00:00 2019, Freddy, Sylvain, BEAM, General, LiF, Scaler Evolution run 158 r0158.pdf
Evolution of scaler during run0158 _ from 19h to 24h00

--> Beam extremely unstable from zero to 10**7 pps (for not more than 5 min).
--> Several moment without beam, either lost at C0 or trying to optimize.
Ongoing, e768s, Mon Jul 29 22:50:43 2019, Sylvain & Freddy, ONLINE, General, LiF, Screenshots run 158 @ 22h05 19x
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 01:20:21 2019, Jenn & Franco, BEAM, General, LiF, Beam intensity, profile check and SUMMARY night photo_2019-07-30_00-19-19.jpgscaler_4.pngcorrelation.png
In run 158 at around 01:00am PCP took the beam to try to optimize it. We got the beam back after ~15 minutes.

Beam intensity ~1.2e7
OR MUGAST ~ 160
OR VAMOS ~ 650

30 minutes later: comparing the actual beam profile with the previous ones it looks like the beam has shifted on the horizontal axis (before the centroid was -1.9, now it is -3.4).
At the same time we noticed an increase in the AGATA counting rate (~ 35k). AGATA itself is not very stable, each now and then all the detectors go in back pressure for few
seconds and then they come back to the normal status. Moreover we see more counts on the second line in the correlation matrix (see figure attached). We think that maybe
with the last optimization the beam is slightly touching somewhere out of the target.

At 02:15am there was a problem with the vacuum on the PCP side so the beam went off. We wait for a guy to come in ~45min and solve this issue or understand WThell is happening.
RUN 158 won't be stopped to avoid DAQ problems.

TO UNDERSTAND: even after beam stopped 30 min ago, OR Vamos is still counting ~100 Hz while AGATA and MUGAST are counting nothing.
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 04:04:27 2019, Jenn & Franco, RUN, General, LiF, Beam back at 4.00 h scaler_5.pngIMG_20190730_040124.jpg
We had the beam back at 4.00 a.m.
Beam profile and intensity checked: 1.2e7

OR VAMOS ~ 630
OR MUGAST ~ 170
OR AGATA ~ 35k

The AGATA rate is still very high.
    Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 04:25:49 2019, Jenn & Franco & Teodora, BEAM, General, LiF, Beam intensity, profile check and SUMMARY night IMG_20190730_042215.jpg

This is what we were seeing in agata. We think it might be possible we were having a bit of beam implanted somewhere. We called PCP to check.



Jenn & Franco wrote:
In run 158 at around 01:00am PCP took the beam to try to optimize it. We got the beam back after ~15 minutes.

Beam intensity ~1.2e7
OR MUGAST ~ 160
OR VAMOS ~ 650

30 minutes later: comparing the actual beam profile with the previous ones it looks like the beam has shifted on the horizontal axis (before the centroid was -1.9, now it is -3.4).
At the same time we noticed an increase in the AGATA counting rate (~ 35k). AGATA itself is not very stable, each now and then all the detectors go in back pressure for few
seconds and then they come back to the normal status. Moreover we see more counts on the second line in the correlation matrix (see figure attached). We think that maybe
with the last optimization the beam is slightly touching somewhere out of the target.

At 02:15am there was a problem with the vacuum on the PCP side so the beam went off. We wait for a guy to come in ~45min and solve this issue or understand WThell is happening.
RUN 158 won't be stopped to avoid DAQ problems.

TO UNDERSTAND: even after beam stopped 30 min ago, OR Vamos is still counting ~100 Hz while AGATA and MUGAST are counting nothing.
    Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 04:40:18 2019, Jenn & Franco & Teodora, RUN, General, LiF, Beam back at 4.00 h scaler_6.pngIMG-20190730-WA0000.jpg
Due to the high rate of AGATA and Mugast (probably due to some implantation) we asked the PCP to readjust the beam.
They centered it a bit more on the profiler and now it looks better. Attached are the new rates.

OR VAMOS ~ 620
OR MUGAST ~ 170
OR AGATA ~ 7k


Jenn & Franco wrote:
We had the beam back at 4.00 a.m.
Beam profile and intensity checked: 1.2e7

OR VAMOS ~ 630
OR MUGAST ~ 170
OR AGATA ~ 35k
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 05:32:33 2019, Teodora & Franco, RUN, General, LiF, Screenshots run 158 - 5:30h + beam profile at 6:00h 20x
Scalers and beam profile measurement taken at 6:00 h.
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 07:49:09 2019, Teodora & Franco, RUN, General, LiF, Check beam intensity and profile run158 h 8:00 IMG_20190730_074602.jpgscaler_8.png
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 11:08:30 2019, OttoRun, RUN, General, LiF, Run159 
*************************
Run : 159
*************************

Start at 2019-07-30 11:07:33.907674

15O beam

Brho = 0.556 Tm

target LiF thick number 1

OR VAMOS 653
OR Mugast 156
Fag 206

beam intensity 1.3e7 pps

TRIGGERS:
MG BACK
MG 90
MUST2
VAMOS%10
BF2%100

Stop at 2019-07-30 16:22:08.584979
Stop comment:
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 15:47:46 2019, Nicolas, BEAM, General, , Beam stopped since 11h30 
vacuum problem in CSS1
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 16:22:21 2019, mugast, RUN, General, LiF, Beam is back. Intensity= 7e6 pps. Start a new run : run 160  scalers_run160_1.png20190730_161935.jpg
Run 160.
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 16:39:03 2019, OttoRun, RUN, General, LiF, Run160 
*************************
Run : 160
*************************

Start at 2019-07-30 16:38:24.263869

15O beam

Brho = 0.556 Tm

target LiF thick number 1

OR VAMOS 715
OR Mugast 168
Fag 206

beam intensity 7 106pss

TRIGGERS:
MG BACK
MG 90
MUST2
VAMOS%10
BF2%100

Stop at 2019-07-31 16:43:13.641726
Stop comment: Let's go to the beach......
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 19:13:57 2019, Faïrouz & Ksenia, RUN, General, LiF, Screenshots run 160 @ 19h10 & scalers 20x
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 21:36:43 2019, Faïrouz & Ksenia, RUN, General, LiF, Beam profile & scalers (run160) @21h36 20190730_213330-21h35.jpgscalers_run160_4.png
Fixed, e768s, Tue Jul 30 23:46:25 2019, Faïrouz & Ksenia, RUN, General, LiF, Beam profile & scalers (run160) @23h45 scalers_run160_5.png20190730_235130-23h54.jpg
Fixed, e768s, Wed Jul 31 03:22:42 2019, Freddy, Chloé, BEAM, General, , Beam profile (run160) @2h24 20190731_022419.jpg
Fixed, e768s, Wed Jul 31 03:25:57 2019, Freddy, Chloé, BEAM, General, N/A, Scaler Evolution run 160 r0160.pdf
Scaler evolution during run 160 until 3h30 on Wednesday 31st.

- rather stable condition around 1.5 * 10^7 pps
- square detector seems to have some fluctuating trigger rate certainly due to some strips with larger noise or baseline fluctuations.
Fixed, e768s, Wed Jul 31 04:13:31 2019, Freddy, Chloé, BEAM, General, N/A, HF CIME disjonction 20190731_043126.jpgscalers_run160_8.png
Disjonction HF CIME at 4h14

Restart at 4h30 (see beam profile and scalers after restart)

ELOG Home Page