MUST2 SAMURAI_2018 S3-LEB-LPC SUPERNEMO MUGAST EXPAND SCALP GALATRON HiCARI VELO
  MUGAST, Page 2 of 132  Not logged in MUGAST
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
Status ExpNbr Date Author Type Categorydown Target-Source Subject
Fixedcom2019 Sat Apr 6 08:18:55 2019 mugastRUNSoftwareCD2Online Scalers run 256 @8h00 am 06/04 for reference
Attachment 1: Scalers060419-08am.png
Scalers060419-08am.png
Attachment 2: Must2X060419-08am.png
Must2X060419-08am.png
Attachment 3: Must2Y-060419_08am.png
Must2Y-060419_08am.png
Attachment 4: Must2MugastXYMatrix060419_08am.png
Must2MugastXYMatrix060419_08am.png
Attachment 5: MUGAST060419_08am.png
MUGAST060419_08am.png
Fixedcom2019 Sat Apr 6 10:57:35 2019 NicolasOFFLINESoftwareCD2time of flight v.s. energy in MUGAST (run 256, all stat)
Attachment 1: ToF_dE_MUGAST_run256_all_stat.pdf
ToF_dE_MUGAST_run256_all_stat.pdf
Fixedcom2019 Sat Apr 6 11:40:08 2019 mugastOFFLINESoftwareCD2 AGATA spectrum in coincidence with MUGAST VAMOS run 256
Attachment 1: 04.png
04.png
Fixedcom2019 Sun Apr 7 14:24:18 2019 ValerianOFFLINESoftwareCD2Ex and E gamma with all statistic (run 256+257)
Attachment 1: bilan_run256_and_257_Ex_Egamma.png
bilan_run256_and_257_Ex_Egamma.png
Fixedcom2019 Tue Apr 9 10:44:40 2019 ValerianMUST2SoftwareCD2CsI Calib files from the commissioning for proton
CsI calibration obtained from the proton data of the commissioning of mugast.
Attachment 1: Cal_CsI_E_MM1.cal
MUST2_T1_CsI1_E -349.193 0.0426562 
MUST2_T1_CsI2_E -365.544 0.0445866 
MUST2_T1_CsI3_E -395.1 0.0481881 
MUST2_T1_CsI4_E -339.257 0.0413942 
MUST2_T1_CsI5_E -300.562 0.036683 
MUST2_T1_CsI6_E -305.873 0.0373042 
MUST2_T1_CsI7_E -306.176 0.0372682 
MUST2_T1_CsI8_E -306.058 0.0372823 
MUST2_T1_CsI9_E -379.8 0.046326 
MUST2_T1_CsI10_E -389.184 0.0452695 
MUST2_T1_CsI11_E -323.838 0.0394854 
MUST2_T1_CsI12_E -345.276 0.0421109 
MUST2_T1_CsI13_E -346.313 0.0419908 
MUST2_T1_CsI14_E -323.431 0.0394665 
MUST2_T1_CsI15_E -381.394 0.0465157 
MUST2_T1_CsI16_E -366.608 0.0447318 
Attachment 2: Cal_CsI_E_MM2.cal
MUST2_T2_CsI1_E -395.198 0.0482442 
MUST2_T2_CsI2_E -358.257 0.0437269 
MUST2_T2_CsI3_E -222.987 0.0272904 
MUST2_T2_CsI4_E -320.924 0.0391246 
MUST2_T2_CsI5_E -304.016 0.0371591 
MUST2_T2_CsI6_E -360.763 0.044042 
MUST2_T2_CsI7_E -338.862 0.0413499 
MUST2_T2_CsI8_E -323.388 0.0395278 
MUST2_T2_CsI9_E -297.329 0.0362987 
MUST2_T2_CsI10_E -353.491 0.0431759 
MUST2_T2_CsI11_E -336.682 0.0410607 
MUST2_T2_CsI12_E -322.943 0.0393981 
MUST2_T2_CsI13_E -352.883 0.0430912 
MUST2_T2_CsI14_E -265.011 0.0323568 
MUST2_T2_CsI15_E -411.526 0.0502348 
MUST2_T2_CsI16_E -381.945 0.0466196 
Attachment 3: Cal_CsI_E_MM3.cal
MUST2_T3_CsI1_E 0 0 
MUST2_T3_CsI2_E -233.624 0.0285431 
MUST2_T3_CsI3_E -269.869 0.0329581 
MUST2_T3_CsI4_E -198.672 0.0244026 
MUST2_T3_CsI5_E -167.381 0.020794 
MUST2_T3_CsI6_E -285.043 0.0347164 
MUST2_T3_CsI7_E -306.174 0.0372958 
MUST2_T3_CsI8_E -289.492 0.0353261 
MUST2_T3_CsI9_E -262.419 0.0320755 
MUST2_T3_CsI10_E -262.419 0.0320755 
MUST2_T3_CsI11_E -339.706 0.0412583 
MUST2_T3_CsI12_E -276.843 0.0338448 
MUST2_T3_CsI13_E -283.321 0.0345096 
MUST2_T3_CsI14_E -282.583 0.0344342 
MUST2_T3_CsI15_E -280.308 0.034049 
MUST2_T3_CsI16_E -239.464 0.0292454 
Attachment 4: Cal_CsI_E_MM4.cal
MUST2_T4_CsI1_E -274.041 0.0334448 
MUST2_T4_CsI2_E -238.158 0.029079 
MUST2_T4_CsI3_E -212.05 0.0259187 
MUST2_T4_CsI4_E -328.425 0.040072 
MUST2_T4_CsI5_E -238.067 0.0290967 
MUST2_T4_CsI6_E -255.208 0.0311713 
MUST2_T4_CsI7_E -274.469 0.0334524 
MUST2_T4_CsI8_E -264.172 0.0322145 
MUST2_T4_CsI9_E -228.564 0.0279046 
MUST2_T4_CsI10_E -274.475 0.0335075 
MUST2_T4_CsI11_E -313.537 0.0382149 
MUST2_T4_CsI12_E -333.735 0.0405833 
MUST2_T4_CsI13_E -241.099 0.0294403 
MUST2_T4_CsI14_E -214.379 0.026157 
MUST2_T4_CsI15_E -212.264 0.0258707 
MUST2_T4_CsI16_E -250.657 0.0305457 
Fixede744s Tue Apr 9 18:08:22 2019 Marlène and FrançoisDAQSoftware new inputs in the ADC Mugast
new inputs in the ADC mugast
T_Mugast_HF = input N°2
E_AGATA = agata 42 = input N°3
T_AGATA_HF = N° 4

gains of the signal AGATA 42 were changed from 200 to 50

Pinnede744s Wed Apr 10 11:57:37 2019 A. LemassonOFFLINESoftware VAMOS Conversion HowTo

HOW TO convert a run in VAMOS
  • Do : source $HOME/GoToVamosAna
  • To Convert a Run : MyVAna -d2Ar <RunNr>
  • Otherwise, If you want to convert a single file : MyVAna -d2Ar -f <Infile> <OutFile>
  • Output Root rile is written to : ./RootA/

If you encounter the error on Brho "Could not find the BrhoRef for the run <RunNr> ", Update the ./Calibs/ListBrho.dat file with relevant Brho for RunNr
Pinnede786s Wed Apr 10 13:30:48 2019 Valerian, Adrien and Antoine (edit by Louis)OFFLINESoftwareN/AHow to perform analysis for e786s

Here is the updated procedure to convert a run, with VAMOS data and add those data to the Kinematic plot.


Every 4Go there will be a file change, to see if there is a file change do :

  • ls -ltrh /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/run/

convert the last 4Go file and add it to the chain using the following step:

Step O: Take your favorite ortholinear keyboard (optional)

Step 1: Login the VAMOS environment and convert the run :

Open a terminal from one of the mugast computer:
  • Type: source $HOME/GoToVamosAna
  • Type: MyVAna -d2Ar -f /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/run/run_$$$$-DD-MM-YY.HHhMMmSSs /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/RootA/r$$$$_000a.root
OR
  • Type: MyVAna -d2Ar -f /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/run/run_$$$$-DD-MM-YY.HHhMMmSSs.N /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/RootA/r$$$$_00Na.root
(If you encounter the error on Brho "Could not find the BrhoRef for the run <RunNr> ", Update the ./Calibs/ListBrho.dat file with relevant Brho for RunNr)

Step 2: Analyse the file using the npanalysis program:
  • Type: exit (<-this exit the environment of VAMOS)
  • Type: lpcgrit (<-this load the analysis environment )
  • Type: npp MUGAST
  • Type: edit the exe.sh to treat releverant run. command should be: npanalysis -D mugast.detector -C Calibration.txt -E ./Reaction/46Ar3Hed.reaction -T ./offline/root_e786svamos/r$$$$_00Na.root AD -O run_$$$$_N.root

(This could be used with any file, either from Offline conversion, or the VAMOS Analysis conversion or the Merged Tree from AGATA)

The run will be created in the NPOutputs folder
Fixede744s Thu Apr 11 11:36:09 2019 ValerianOFFLINESoftwareCH2Comparison between the two e744
Current calibration is off, a shift of -1.5MeV was done to reproduce the previous data.
Attachment 1: current_exp_old_e744.png
current_exp_old_e744.png
Fixede744s Thu Apr 11 13:43:26 2019 ValerianOFFLINESoftwareCH2Target position for 14N runs
Attachment 1: XY_run14N.png
XY_run14N.png
Attachment 2: Xshift_run14N.png
Xshift_run14N.png
Attachment 3: Yshift_run14N.png
Yshift_run14N.png
Fixede744s Thu Apr 11 16:07:59 2019 Valerian and LouisOFFLINESoftwareCH2HF resolution
Using the value of the HF=83,4ns. We can obtain the calibrated plot of T_CATS2_HF which is joined and gives us roughly a 2-3 ns resolution for the HF
Attachment 1: T_CATS2_HFns.png
T_CATS2_HFns.png
Fixede744s Thu Apr 11 18:20:27 2019 Valerian and DiegoOFFLINESoftwareCH2Timing issue between vamos and mugast
A cut is seen on the TAC between MUGAST and the focal plane multiwire of VAMOS when one select XF or DC0_Y>-1500


Edit: This must be a reconstruction problem as it is not seen in the Raw files (using DC0_X for example)

Edit: This is not only a reconstruction problem as the cut appear again if one select DC0_Y

Edit: We changed VAMOS FAG validation window from 500ns to 800ns
Attachment 1: T_MUGAST_FPMW.png
T_MUGAST_FPMW.png
Attachment 2: T_MUGAST_FPMW1.png
T_MUGAST_FPMW1.png
Fixede744s Fri Apr 12 10:12:45 2019 ValerianOFFLINESoftwareCH2Comparison between HF and CATS for ELab ThetaLab
Using the HF show noises that is not seen with CATS on the ToF spectra
Attachment 1: ELabThetaLabrun87_E744_HFvsCATS.png
ELabThetaLabrun87_E744_HFvsCATS.png
Fixede744s Fri Apr 12 14:13:11 2019 Giuseppe D'AgataOTHERSoftwareN/AConverted runs

Runs additionally converted up to now:
70
71
80.0
80.1
81.0
81.1
82
83
84
85

86.1

91
94
95

96.1
97
98
Fixede744s Fri Apr 12 19:44:09 2019 diegoVAMOSSoftware SetAlias script for VAMOS identification
Attachment 1: SetAlias.C
char cond[1000];
TTree *t1;
void SetAlias()
{
  gStyle->SetPalette(1);

  t1 = (TTree*) gROOT->FindObject("AD")
;
  t1->SetAlias("fExist_DC_Y","DC0_Y>-1500&&DC1_Y>-1500&&DC2_Y>-1500&&DC3_Y>-1500"); 
  t1->SetAlias("fExist_IC","IC[0]>0&&IC[1]>0&&IC[2]>0&&IC[3]>0"); 

  t1->SetAlias("mT","(T_FPMW_CATS2_C*-1 + 305.3 + -4*(MWTVN==8)-1*(MWTVN==9)-1*(MWTVN==10)-2.2*(MWTVN==11)-0.7*(MWTVN==12)-0.5*(MWTVN==15)-0.6*(MWTVN==16)-1.1*(MWTVN==17)+0.6*(MWTVN==18)-1*(MWTVN==6)-0.5*(MWTVN==5)-0.5*(MWTVN==4)-1.5*(MWTVN==3))*(T_FPMW_CATS1_C>10)");
  t1->SetAlias("mD","D");
  t1->SetAlias("mV","(mD)/mT");
  t1->SetAlias("mBeta","mV/29.9792");
  t1->SetAlias("mGamma","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta*mBeta)");
  
  t1->SetAlias("mM_Q","Brho/3.107/mBeta/mGamma");
  t1->SetAlias("mM","(mE)/931.5016/(mGamma-1.)");
  t1->SetAlias("mMr","mM_Q*((13.*qmq13+14.*qmq14+15.*qmq15+16.*qmq16))"); 
  t1->SetAlias("mQ","mM/mM_Q");
 
  //t1->SetAlias("mT1","(T_FPMW_HF_C*-1. + 559. + 3*(MWTVN==8))*(T_FPMW_HF_C>10)");
  t1->SetAlias("mT1","1.5+((23.7593+1.03259*MWTV)*(MWTVN==0)+(-9.53168+1.0711*MWTV)*(MWTVN==1)+(-30.486+1.11554*MWTV)*(MWTVN==2)+(-31.1261+1.11624*MWTV)*(MWTVN==3)+(-62.99829+1.1569*MWTV)*(MWTVN==4)+(-47.9021+1.13413*MWTV)*(MWTVN==5)+(-14.3957+1.08086*MWTV)*(MWTVN==6)+(-24.6655+1.1058*MWTV)*(MWTVN==7)+(60.4375+0.981809*MWTV)*(MWTVN==8)+(4.44472+1.06168*MWTV)*(MWTVN==9)+(11.408+1.04492*MWTV)*(MWTVN==10)+(56.8282+0.990287*MWTV)*(MWTVN==11)+(59.6833+0.995356*MWTV)*(MWTVN==12)+(27.6344+1.02846*MWTV)*(MWTVN==13)+(6.02794+1.06554*MWTV)*(MWTVN==14)+(20.1561+1.0342*MWTV)*(MWTVN==15)+(51.0718+1.01008*MWTV)*(MWTVN==16)+(36.5605+1.0391*MWTV)*(MWTVN==17)+(-6.01158+1.09581*MWTV)*(MWTVN==18)+(37.6143+1.00939*MWTV)*(MWTVN==19)+(29.3289+1.01291*MWTV)*(MWTVN==20) + 3*83.4*(GATCONF_MASTER==8)-0*(GATCONF_MASTER==1)-2*83.4*(GATCONF_MASTER==4))");
  t1->SetAlias("mT1","540-2*T_FPMW_CATS2_C");
  t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[0]+IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3]+IC[4])*(IC[0]>0.1&&IC[1]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1&&IC[3]>0.1)");
  //  t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3])*(IC[1]>1&&IC[2]>1&&IC[3]>1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mdE0","IC[0]*(IC[0]>1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mdE1","IC[0]*(IC[0]>1)+IC[1]*(IC[1]>1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mD1","Path");
  t1->SetAlias("mV1","mD1/(mT1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mBeta1","mV1/29.9792");
  t1->SetAlias("mGamma1","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta1*mBeta1)");
  
  t1->SetAlias("mM_Q1","Brho/3.107/mBeta1/mGamma1");
  t1->SetAlias("mM1","1.3*(mE1)/931.5016/(mGamma1-1.)");
  t1->SetAlias("mMr","mM_Q*((13.*qmq13+14.*qmq14+15.*qmq15+16.*qmq16))"); 
  t1->SetAlias("mQ1","mM1/mM_Q1");
  t1->SetAlias("ProjD","-174.*1.");
  t1->SetAlias("Xt","TMW1_X+ProjD*tan(TP_Theta/1000.)");
  t1->SetAlias("Yt","TMW1_Y+ProjD*tan(TP_Phi/1000.)");

 
  t1->SetAlias("mT2","535.1-2*T_FPMW_CATS2_C-1.2*(MWTVN==11)-0.3*(MWTVN==12)-0.5*(MWTVN==10)-0.7*(MWTVN==9)-2.8*(MWTVN==8)+0.2*(MWTVN==7)-0.4*(MWTVN==5)-1.0*(MWTVN==4)-3.0*(MWTVN==3)-3.0*(MWTVN==2)-8.0*(MWTVN==1)");
 //t1->SetAlias("mT2","mT1-TMWT1_MWT2_C+31");
  //  t1->SetAlias("mT2","mT1-4.83");

  //t1->SetAlias("mD2","D-10.5/cos(TP_Theta/1000.)/cos(TP_Phi/1000.)");
  t1->SetAlias("mE2","1.42*(IC[0]+IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3]+0.3*IC[4])*(IC[0]>0.1&&IC[1]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1&&IC[3]>0.1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mdE2","(IC[0]+IC[1])*(IC[0]>0.1&&IC[1]>0.1)");
  //  t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3])*(IC[1]>1&&IC[2]>1&&IC[3]>1)");
  t1->SetAlias("mD2","Path");
  t1->SetAlias("mV2","mD2/(mT2)");
  t1->SetAlias("mBeta2","mV2/29.9792");
  t1->SetAlias("mGamma2","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta2*mBeta2)");
  
  t1->SetAlias("mM_Q2","Brho/3.107/mV2*29.9792");
  t1->SetAlias("mM2","(mE2)/931.5016/(mGamma2-1.)");
  t1->SetAlias("mQ2","mM2/mM_Q2");
  t1->SetAlias("mMrec","int(mQ2+0.5)*mM_Q2");
  
}
Fixede744s Fri Apr 12 22:44:43 2019 Valerian and DiegoOFFLINESoftwareCH213N measured in Vamos do correspond to protons events in MUST2
Doing a cut on M vs M/Q corresponding to 13N one can see that most of the events do correspond to protons events in MUST2!!!
Attachment 1: Vamos13N_and_MUST2protons.png
Vamos13N_and_MUST2protons.png
Fixede744s Sat Apr 13 00:27:08 2019 iulian nicolas Nikola MariluzRUNSoftwareCH2Screenshots run119 v1
Attachment 1: run119_Vamos_1_1.png
run119_Vamos_1_1.png
Attachment 2: run119_Vamos_1_11.png
run119_Vamos_1_11.png
Attachment 3: run119_Vamos_1_10.png
run119_Vamos_1_10.png
Attachment 4: run119_Vamos_1_9.png
run119_Vamos_1_9.png
Attachment 5: run119_Vamos_1_8.png
run119_Vamos_1_8.png
Attachment 6: run119_Vamos_1_7.png
run119_Vamos_1_7.png
Attachment 7: run119_Vamos_1_6.png
run119_Vamos_1_6.png
Attachment 8: run119_Vamos_1_5.png
run119_Vamos_1_5.png
Attachment 9: run119_Vamos_1_4.png
run119_Vamos_1_4.png
Attachment 10: run119_Vamos_1_3.png
run119_Vamos_1_3.png
Attachment 11: run119_Vamos_1_2.png
run119_Vamos_1_2.png
Attachment 12: run119_Mugast_1_9.png
run119_Mugast_1_9.png
Attachment 13: run119_Mugast_1_8.png
run119_Mugast_1_8.png
Attachment 14: run119_Mugast_1_7.png
run119_Mugast_1_7.png
Attachment 15: run119_Mugast_1_6.png
run119_Mugast_1_6.png
Attachment 16: run119_Mugast_1_5.png
run119_Mugast_1_5.png
Attachment 17: run119_Mugast_1_4.png
run119_Mugast_1_4.png
Attachment 18: run119_Mugast_1_3.png
run119_Mugast_1_3.png
Attachment 19: run119_Mugast_1_2.png
run119_Mugast_1_2.png
Attachment 20: run119_Mugast_1_1.png
run119_Mugast_1_1.png
Attachment 21: run119_Scalers_1_1.png
run119_Scalers_1_1.png
Fixede744s Sat Apr 13 22:45:27 2019 Beyhan, Sylvain, JaromirAGATASoftwareN/AAgata yellow phase 1 minute
Agata yellow 1 minute

All the trigers emitted by (every) single crystal were refused by ACQ for 1 minute.
Reason unknown now.
Fixede744s Sat Apr 13 23:19:57 2019 Valerian, Freddy, Iulian and FairouzOFFLINESoftwareCH2Very preliminary results for two protons
Join are very preliminary spectra for the two protons events gated on 13N in VAMOS with a multiplicity 1 event in MUST2. This condition adds a lot of noise.
Attachment 1: TwoProtonsMult1_run122_0_1.png
TwoProtonsMult1_run122_0_1.png
Fixede744s Sun Apr 14 12:11:52 2019 Valerian and IulianOFFLINESoftwareCH2VERY VERY preliminary results Gamma-p
Around 8-10 events are found in the good energy vs Brho region and Si_T vs Si_E region for the gamma emission.

Joined are :

- the cut done for Energy vs Brho
- the "good" Events plotted on the Si_E vs Si_T spectra for each telescope.


one can see that most events are in, or close to the punch through but some of them ~8-10 are not -> very good candidates for proton after gamma emission
Attachment 1: EPCM_Brho_gamma.png
EPCM_Brho_gamma.png
Attachment 2: PossiblePafterGamma_ToF.png
PossiblePafterGamma_ToF.png
Attachment 3: Epcm_gamma.png
Epcm_gamma.png

ELOG Home Page