Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
Fixed | com2019 |
Sat Apr 6 08:18:55 2019 |
mugast | RUN | Software | CD2 | Online Scalers run 256 @8h00 am 06/04 for reference |
|
Attachment 1: Scalers060419-08am.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Must2X060419-08am.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Must2Y-060419_08am.png
|
|
Attachment 4: Must2MugastXYMatrix060419_08am.png
|
|
Attachment 5: MUGAST060419_08am.png
|
|
Fixed | com2019 |
Sat Apr 6 10:57:35 2019 |
Nicolas | OFFLINE | Software | CD2 | time of flight v.s. energy in MUGAST (run 256, all stat) |
|
Attachment 1: ToF_dE_MUGAST_run256_all_stat.pdf
|
|
Fixed | com2019 |
Sat Apr 6 11:40:08 2019 |
mugast | OFFLINE | Software | CD2 | AGATA spectrum in coincidence with MUGAST VAMOS run 256 |
|
Attachment 1: 04.png
|
|
Fixed | com2019 |
Sun Apr 7 14:24:18 2019 |
Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CD2 | Ex and E gamma with all statistic (run 256+257) |
|
Attachment 1: bilan_run256_and_257_Ex_Egamma.png
|
|
Fixed | com2019 |
Tue Apr 9 10:44:40 2019 |
Valerian | MUST2 | Software | CD2 | CsI Calib files from the commissioning for proton |
CsI calibration obtained from the proton data of the commissioning of mugast. |
Attachment 1: Cal_CsI_E_MM1.cal
|
MUST2_T1_CsI1_E -349.193 0.0426562
MUST2_T1_CsI2_E -365.544 0.0445866
MUST2_T1_CsI3_E -395.1 0.0481881
MUST2_T1_CsI4_E -339.257 0.0413942
MUST2_T1_CsI5_E -300.562 0.036683
MUST2_T1_CsI6_E -305.873 0.0373042
MUST2_T1_CsI7_E -306.176 0.0372682
MUST2_T1_CsI8_E -306.058 0.0372823
MUST2_T1_CsI9_E -379.8 0.046326
MUST2_T1_CsI10_E -389.184 0.0452695
MUST2_T1_CsI11_E -323.838 0.0394854
MUST2_T1_CsI12_E -345.276 0.0421109
MUST2_T1_CsI13_E -346.313 0.0419908
MUST2_T1_CsI14_E -323.431 0.0394665
MUST2_T1_CsI15_E -381.394 0.0465157
MUST2_T1_CsI16_E -366.608 0.0447318
|
Attachment 2: Cal_CsI_E_MM2.cal
|
MUST2_T2_CsI1_E -395.198 0.0482442
MUST2_T2_CsI2_E -358.257 0.0437269
MUST2_T2_CsI3_E -222.987 0.0272904
MUST2_T2_CsI4_E -320.924 0.0391246
MUST2_T2_CsI5_E -304.016 0.0371591
MUST2_T2_CsI6_E -360.763 0.044042
MUST2_T2_CsI7_E -338.862 0.0413499
MUST2_T2_CsI8_E -323.388 0.0395278
MUST2_T2_CsI9_E -297.329 0.0362987
MUST2_T2_CsI10_E -353.491 0.0431759
MUST2_T2_CsI11_E -336.682 0.0410607
MUST2_T2_CsI12_E -322.943 0.0393981
MUST2_T2_CsI13_E -352.883 0.0430912
MUST2_T2_CsI14_E -265.011 0.0323568
MUST2_T2_CsI15_E -411.526 0.0502348
MUST2_T2_CsI16_E -381.945 0.0466196
|
Attachment 3: Cal_CsI_E_MM3.cal
|
MUST2_T3_CsI1_E 0 0
MUST2_T3_CsI2_E -233.624 0.0285431
MUST2_T3_CsI3_E -269.869 0.0329581
MUST2_T3_CsI4_E -198.672 0.0244026
MUST2_T3_CsI5_E -167.381 0.020794
MUST2_T3_CsI6_E -285.043 0.0347164
MUST2_T3_CsI7_E -306.174 0.0372958
MUST2_T3_CsI8_E -289.492 0.0353261
MUST2_T3_CsI9_E -262.419 0.0320755
MUST2_T3_CsI10_E -262.419 0.0320755
MUST2_T3_CsI11_E -339.706 0.0412583
MUST2_T3_CsI12_E -276.843 0.0338448
MUST2_T3_CsI13_E -283.321 0.0345096
MUST2_T3_CsI14_E -282.583 0.0344342
MUST2_T3_CsI15_E -280.308 0.034049
MUST2_T3_CsI16_E -239.464 0.0292454
|
Attachment 4: Cal_CsI_E_MM4.cal
|
MUST2_T4_CsI1_E -274.041 0.0334448
MUST2_T4_CsI2_E -238.158 0.029079
MUST2_T4_CsI3_E -212.05 0.0259187
MUST2_T4_CsI4_E -328.425 0.040072
MUST2_T4_CsI5_E -238.067 0.0290967
MUST2_T4_CsI6_E -255.208 0.0311713
MUST2_T4_CsI7_E -274.469 0.0334524
MUST2_T4_CsI8_E -264.172 0.0322145
MUST2_T4_CsI9_E -228.564 0.0279046
MUST2_T4_CsI10_E -274.475 0.0335075
MUST2_T4_CsI11_E -313.537 0.0382149
MUST2_T4_CsI12_E -333.735 0.0405833
MUST2_T4_CsI13_E -241.099 0.0294403
MUST2_T4_CsI14_E -214.379 0.026157
MUST2_T4_CsI15_E -212.264 0.0258707
MUST2_T4_CsI16_E -250.657 0.0305457
|
Fixed | e744s |
Tue Apr 9 18:08:22 2019 |
Marlène and François | DAQ | Software | | new inputs in the ADC Mugast |
new inputs in the ADC mugast
T_Mugast_HF = input N°2
E_AGATA = agata 42 = input N°3
T_AGATA_HF = N° 4
gains of the signal AGATA 42 were changed from 200 to 50
|
Pinned | e744s |
Wed Apr 10 11:57:37 2019 |
A. Lemasson | OFFLINE | Software | | VAMOS Conversion HowTo |
HOW TO convert a run in VAMOS
- Do : source $HOME/GoToVamosAna
- To Convert a Run : MyVAna -d2Ar <RunNr>
- Otherwise, If you want to convert a single file : MyVAna -d2Ar -f <Infile> <OutFile>
- Output Root rile is written to : ./RootA/
If you encounter the error on Brho "Could not find the BrhoRef for the run <RunNr> ", Update the ./Calibs/ListBrho.dat file with relevant Brho for RunNr |
Pinned | e786s |
Wed Apr 10 13:30:48 2019 |
Valerian, Adrien and Antoine (edit by Louis) | OFFLINE | Software | N/A | How to perform analysis for e786s |
Here is the updated procedure to convert a run, with VAMOS data and add those data to the Kinematic plot.
Every 4Go there will be a file change, to see if there is a file change do :
- ls -ltrh /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/run/
convert the last 4Go file and add it to the chain using the following step:
Step O: Take your favorite ortholinear keyboard (optional)
Step 1: Login the VAMOS environment and convert the run :
Open a terminal from one of the mugast computer:
- Type: source $HOME/GoToVamosAna
- Type: MyVAna -d2Ar -f /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/run/run_$$$$-DD-MM-YY.HHhMMmSSs /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/RootA/r$$$$_000a.root
OR
- Type: MyVAna -d2Ar -f /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/run/run_$$$$-DD-MM-YY.HHhMMmSSs.N /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/RootA/r$$$$_00Na.root
(If you encounter the error on Brho "Could not find the BrhoRef for the run <RunNr> ", Update the ./Calibs/ListBrho.dat file with relevant Brho for RunNr)
Step 2: Analyse the file using the npanalysis program:
- Type: exit (<-this exit the environment of VAMOS)
- Type: lpcgrit (<-this load the analysis environment )
- Type: npp MUGAST
- Type: edit the exe.sh to treat releverant run. command should be: npanalysis -D mugast.detector -C Calibration.txt -E ./Reaction/46Ar3Hed.reaction -T ./offline/root_e786svamos/r$$$$_00Na.root AD -O run_$$$$_N.root
(This could be used with any file, either from Offline conversion, or the VAMOS Analysis conversion or the Merged Tree from AGATA)
The run will be created in the NPOutputs folder |
Fixed | e744s |
Thu Apr 11 11:36:09 2019 |
Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | Comparison between the two e744 |
Current calibration is off, a shift of -1.5MeV was done to reproduce the previous data. |
Attachment 1: current_exp_old_e744.png
|
|
Fixed | e744s |
Thu Apr 11 13:43:26 2019 |
Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | Target position for 14N runs |
|
Attachment 1: XY_run14N.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Xshift_run14N.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Yshift_run14N.png
|
|
Fixed | e744s |
Thu Apr 11 16:07:59 2019 |
Valerian and Louis | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | HF resolution |
Using the value of the HF=83,4ns. We can obtain the calibrated plot of T_CATS2_HF which is joined and gives us roughly a 2-3 ns resolution for the HF |
Attachment 1: T_CATS2_HFns.png
|
|
Fixed | e744s |
Thu Apr 11 18:20:27 2019 |
Valerian and Diego | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | Timing issue between vamos and mugast |
A cut is seen on the TAC between MUGAST and the focal plane multiwire of VAMOS when one select XF or DC0_Y>-1500
Edit: This must be a reconstruction problem as it is not seen in the Raw files (using DC0_X for example)
Edit: This is not only a reconstruction problem as the cut appear again if one select DC0_Y
Edit: We changed VAMOS FAG validation window from 500ns to 800ns |
Attachment 1: T_MUGAST_FPMW.png
|
|
Attachment 2: T_MUGAST_FPMW1.png
|
|
Fixed | e744s |
Fri Apr 12 10:12:45 2019 |
Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | Comparison between HF and CATS for ELab ThetaLab |
Using the HF show noises that is not seen with CATS on the ToF spectra |
Attachment 1: ELabThetaLabrun87_E744_HFvsCATS.png
|
|
Fixed | e744s |
Fri Apr 12 14:13:11 2019 |
Giuseppe D'Agata | OTHER | Software | N/A | Converted runs |
Runs additionally converted up to now:
70
71
80.0
80.1
81.0
81.1
82
83
84
85
86.1
91
94
95
96.1
97
98 |
Fixed | e744s |
Fri Apr 12 19:44:09 2019 |
diego | VAMOS | Software | | SetAlias script for VAMOS identification |
|
Attachment 1: SetAlias.C
|
char cond[1000];
TTree *t1;
void SetAlias()
{
gStyle->SetPalette(1);
t1 = (TTree*) gROOT->FindObject("AD")
;
t1->SetAlias("fExist_DC_Y","DC0_Y>-1500&&DC1_Y>-1500&&DC2_Y>-1500&&DC3_Y>-1500");
t1->SetAlias("fExist_IC","IC[0]>0&&IC[1]>0&&IC[2]>0&&IC[3]>0");
t1->SetAlias("mT","(T_FPMW_CATS2_C*-1 + 305.3 + -4*(MWTVN==8)-1*(MWTVN==9)-1*(MWTVN==10)-2.2*(MWTVN==11)-0.7*(MWTVN==12)-0.5*(MWTVN==15)-0.6*(MWTVN==16)-1.1*(MWTVN==17)+0.6*(MWTVN==18)-1*(MWTVN==6)-0.5*(MWTVN==5)-0.5*(MWTVN==4)-1.5*(MWTVN==3))*(T_FPMW_CATS1_C>10)");
t1->SetAlias("mD","D");
t1->SetAlias("mV","(mD)/mT");
t1->SetAlias("mBeta","mV/29.9792");
t1->SetAlias("mGamma","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta*mBeta)");
t1->SetAlias("mM_Q","Brho/3.107/mBeta/mGamma");
t1->SetAlias("mM","(mE)/931.5016/(mGamma-1.)");
t1->SetAlias("mMr","mM_Q*((13.*qmq13+14.*qmq14+15.*qmq15+16.*qmq16))");
t1->SetAlias("mQ","mM/mM_Q");
//t1->SetAlias("mT1","(T_FPMW_HF_C*-1. + 559. + 3*(MWTVN==8))*(T_FPMW_HF_C>10)");
t1->SetAlias("mT1","1.5+((23.7593+1.03259*MWTV)*(MWTVN==0)+(-9.53168+1.0711*MWTV)*(MWTVN==1)+(-30.486+1.11554*MWTV)*(MWTVN==2)+(-31.1261+1.11624*MWTV)*(MWTVN==3)+(-62.99829+1.1569*MWTV)*(MWTVN==4)+(-47.9021+1.13413*MWTV)*(MWTVN==5)+(-14.3957+1.08086*MWTV)*(MWTVN==6)+(-24.6655+1.1058*MWTV)*(MWTVN==7)+(60.4375+0.981809*MWTV)*(MWTVN==8)+(4.44472+1.06168*MWTV)*(MWTVN==9)+(11.408+1.04492*MWTV)*(MWTVN==10)+(56.8282+0.990287*MWTV)*(MWTVN==11)+(59.6833+0.995356*MWTV)*(MWTVN==12)+(27.6344+1.02846*MWTV)*(MWTVN==13)+(6.02794+1.06554*MWTV)*(MWTVN==14)+(20.1561+1.0342*MWTV)*(MWTVN==15)+(51.0718+1.01008*MWTV)*(MWTVN==16)+(36.5605+1.0391*MWTV)*(MWTVN==17)+(-6.01158+1.09581*MWTV)*(MWTVN==18)+(37.6143+1.00939*MWTV)*(MWTVN==19)+(29.3289+1.01291*MWTV)*(MWTVN==20) + 3*83.4*(GATCONF_MASTER==8)-0*(GATCONF_MASTER==1)-2*83.4*(GATCONF_MASTER==4))");
t1->SetAlias("mT1","540-2*T_FPMW_CATS2_C");
t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[0]+IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3]+IC[4])*(IC[0]>0.1&&IC[1]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1&&IC[3]>0.1)");
// t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3])*(IC[1]>1&&IC[2]>1&&IC[3]>1)");
t1->SetAlias("mdE0","IC[0]*(IC[0]>1)");
t1->SetAlias("mdE1","IC[0]*(IC[0]>1)+IC[1]*(IC[1]>1)");
t1->SetAlias("mD1","Path");
t1->SetAlias("mV1","mD1/(mT1)");
t1->SetAlias("mBeta1","mV1/29.9792");
t1->SetAlias("mGamma1","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta1*mBeta1)");
t1->SetAlias("mM_Q1","Brho/3.107/mBeta1/mGamma1");
t1->SetAlias("mM1","1.3*(mE1)/931.5016/(mGamma1-1.)");
t1->SetAlias("mMr","mM_Q*((13.*qmq13+14.*qmq14+15.*qmq15+16.*qmq16))");
t1->SetAlias("mQ1","mM1/mM_Q1");
t1->SetAlias("ProjD","-174.*1.");
t1->SetAlias("Xt","TMW1_X+ProjD*tan(TP_Theta/1000.)");
t1->SetAlias("Yt","TMW1_Y+ProjD*tan(TP_Phi/1000.)");
t1->SetAlias("mT2","535.1-2*T_FPMW_CATS2_C-1.2*(MWTVN==11)-0.3*(MWTVN==12)-0.5*(MWTVN==10)-0.7*(MWTVN==9)-2.8*(MWTVN==8)+0.2*(MWTVN==7)-0.4*(MWTVN==5)-1.0*(MWTVN==4)-3.0*(MWTVN==3)-3.0*(MWTVN==2)-8.0*(MWTVN==1)");
//t1->SetAlias("mT2","mT1-TMWT1_MWT2_C+31");
// t1->SetAlias("mT2","mT1-4.83");
//t1->SetAlias("mD2","D-10.5/cos(TP_Theta/1000.)/cos(TP_Phi/1000.)");
t1->SetAlias("mE2","1.42*(IC[0]+IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3]+0.3*IC[4])*(IC[0]>0.1&&IC[1]>0.1&&IC[2]>0.1&&IC[3]>0.1)");
t1->SetAlias("mdE2","(IC[0]+IC[1])*(IC[0]>0.1&&IC[1]>0.1)");
// t1->SetAlias("mE1","(IC[1]+IC[2]+IC[3])*(IC[1]>1&&IC[2]>1&&IC[3]>1)");
t1->SetAlias("mD2","Path");
t1->SetAlias("mV2","mD2/(mT2)");
t1->SetAlias("mBeta2","mV2/29.9792");
t1->SetAlias("mGamma2","1./sqrt(1.0-mBeta2*mBeta2)");
t1->SetAlias("mM_Q2","Brho/3.107/mV2*29.9792");
t1->SetAlias("mM2","(mE2)/931.5016/(mGamma2-1.)");
t1->SetAlias("mQ2","mM2/mM_Q2");
t1->SetAlias("mMrec","int(mQ2+0.5)*mM_Q2");
}
|
Fixed | e744s |
Fri Apr 12 22:44:43 2019 |
Valerian and Diego | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | 13N measured in Vamos do correspond to protons events in MUST2 |
Doing a cut on M vs M/Q corresponding to 13N one can see that most of the events do correspond to protons events in MUST2!!! |
Attachment 1: Vamos13N_and_MUST2protons.png
|
|
Fixed | e744s |
Sat Apr 13 00:27:08 2019 |
iulian nicolas Nikola Mariluz | RUN | Software | CH2 | Screenshots run119 v1 |
|
Attachment 1: run119_Vamos_1_1.png
|
|
Attachment 2: run119_Vamos_1_11.png
|
|
Attachment 3: run119_Vamos_1_10.png
|
|
Attachment 4: run119_Vamos_1_9.png
|
|
Attachment 5: run119_Vamos_1_8.png
|
|
Attachment 6: run119_Vamos_1_7.png
|
|
Attachment 7: run119_Vamos_1_6.png
|
|
Attachment 8: run119_Vamos_1_5.png
|
|
Attachment 9: run119_Vamos_1_4.png
|
|
Attachment 10: run119_Vamos_1_3.png
|
|
Attachment 11: run119_Vamos_1_2.png
|
|
Attachment 12: run119_Mugast_1_9.png
|
|
Attachment 13: run119_Mugast_1_8.png
|
|
Attachment 14: run119_Mugast_1_7.png
|
|
Attachment 15: run119_Mugast_1_6.png
|
|
Attachment 16: run119_Mugast_1_5.png
|
|
Attachment 17: run119_Mugast_1_4.png
|
|
Attachment 18: run119_Mugast_1_3.png
|
|
Attachment 19: run119_Mugast_1_2.png
|
|
Attachment 20: run119_Mugast_1_1.png
|
|
Attachment 21: run119_Scalers_1_1.png
|
|
Fixed | e744s |
Sat Apr 13 22:45:27 2019 |
Beyhan, Sylvain, Jaromir | AGATA | Software | N/A | Agata yellow phase 1 minute |
Agata yellow 1 minute
All the trigers emitted by (every) single crystal were refused by ACQ for 1 minute.
Reason unknown now. |
Fixed | e744s |
Sat Apr 13 23:19:57 2019 |
Valerian, Freddy, Iulian and Fairouz | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | Very preliminary results for two protons |
Join are very preliminary spectra for the two protons events gated on 13N in VAMOS with a multiplicity 1 event in MUST2. This condition adds a lot of noise. |
Attachment 1: TwoProtonsMult1_run122_0_1.png
|
|
Fixed | e744s |
Sun Apr 14 12:11:52 2019 |
Valerian and Iulian | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | VERY VERY preliminary results Gamma-p |
Around 8-10 events are found in the good energy vs Brho region and Si_T vs Si_E region for the gamma emission.
Joined are :
- the cut done for Energy vs Brho
- the "good" Events plotted on the Si_E vs Si_T spectra for each telescope.
one can see that most events are in, or close to the punch through but some of them ~8-10 are not -> very good candidates for proton after gamma emission |
Attachment 1: EPCM_Brho_gamma.png
|
|
Attachment 2: PossiblePafterGamma_ToF.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Epcm_gamma.png
|
|