| Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 07:33:42 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run154 |
*************************
Run : 154
*************************
Start at 2020-02-29 04:31:41.631084
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4e+5
Restart in same conditions as run 152 after reloading RCC config and initializing |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 07:33:46 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run156 |
*************************
Run : 156
*************************
Start at 2020-02-29 06:00:50.625977
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4e+5
Restart in same conditions as run 152 after reloading RCC config and initializing |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 07:34:54 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run160 |
*************************
Run : 160
*************************
Start at 2020-02-29 06:49:38.061167
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4e+5
Restart in same conditions as run 152 after reloading RCC config and initializing
CURRENTLY ISSUES WITH AGATA : AGATA IS NOT RESPONDING SINCE ~4Am ISSUE STILL PENDING
Stop at 2020-02-29 07:39:20.250159
Stop comment: stop for agata test |
| Ongoing | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 07:35:21 2020 |
mugast : Valerian | AGATA | General | CD2 | AGATA is not responding |
| Since ~4:30am AGATA is not responding, everyhting was frozen. Unclear if it comes from disk problem or other... |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 08:01:52 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run161 |
*************************
Run : 161
*************************
Start at 2020-02-29 07:57:29.567615
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4e+5
Restart in same conditions as run 152 after reloading RCC config and initializing
CURRENTLY ISSUES WITH AGATA : AGATA IS NOT RESPONDING SINCE ~4Am ISSUE STILL PENDING
test AGATA
Stop at 2020-02-29 08:01:56.572900
Stop comment: |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 08:51:28 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run162 |
*************************
Run : 162
*************************
Start at 2020-02-29 08:49:53.401544
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4e+5
Restart in same conditions as run 152 after reloading RCC config and initializing
CURRENTLY ISSUES WITH AGATA : AGATA IS NOT RESPONDING SINCE ~4Am ISSUE STILL PENDING
test AGATA
Stop at 2020-02-29 08:51:59.327149
Stop comment: agata not working |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 09:02:46 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run163 |
Stop at 2020-02-29 17:52:47.142006
Stop comment: |
| Ongoing | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 10:34:31 2020 |
mugast ; valerian irene | OFFLINE | Software | CD2-Au | Issues in the EX reconstruction |
We are currently working on the EX reconstruction which is off for detector 1, 3 and 7... One of our guess might be that there is an issue with the position of the detectors which gives error in theta... As the energy calibration is ok. Joined are :
- the Excitation energy for good detectors compared to all detectors,
- the theoretical kinematic line for the 3.57 state for each detectors,
- the excitation energy as a function of the laboratory angle (for this last spectra a clear dependency is visible for telescopes 1,3 and 7)
- the 3D view, which doesn't show clear problem in position... |
| Ongoing | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 14:27:48 2020 |
mugast ; Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CD2 | Issues in the EX reconstruction |
| mugast ; valerian irene wrote: | We are currently working on the EX reconstruction which is off for detector 1, 3 and 7... One of our guess might be that there is an issue with the position of the detectors which gives error in theta... As the energy calibration is ok. Joined are :
- the Excitation energy for good detectors compared to all detectors,
- the theoretical kinematic line for the 3.57 state for each detectors,
- the excitation energy as a function of the laboratory angle (for this last spectra a clear dependency is visible for telescopes 1,3 and 7)
- the 3D view, which doesn't show clear problem in position... |
Testing changing the beam impact :
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
Red lines corresponds to Ex = 3.570 MeV and Ex = 4.070 MeV
To try to correct the problem i also offseted the beam in X and Y, but this doesn't solve the problem quite the opposite as it make the result worse for other detectors also... The fact that it is better at lower angle and worse at higher angle might mean that the detectors angles are tilted compared to the
surveyors measurments... I also tried to use the CAO positions for MG3 (see Detectors/mugast.detector) but it didn't solve the problem. |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 14:32:39 2020 |
mugast : Valerian | GRIT | Hardware | N/A | Scheme of the Mugast position in the nptool referential |
| The detectors with a cross show the problematic detectors |
| Ongoing | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 15:53:12 2020 |
mugast ; Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CD2-Au | Issues in the EX reconstruction |
| mugast ; Valerian wrote: |
| mugast ; valerian irene wrote: | We are currently working on the EX reconstruction which is off for detector 1, 3 and 7... One of our guess might be that there is an issue with the position of the detectors which gives error in theta... As the energy calibration is ok. Joined are :
- the Excitation energy for good detectors compared to all detectors,
- the theoretical kinematic line for the 3.57 state for each detectors,
- the excitation energy as a function of the laboratory angle (for this last spectra a clear dependency is visible for telescopes 1,3 and 7)
- the 3D view, which doesn't show clear problem in position... |
Testing changing the beam impact :
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
Red lines corresponds to Ex = 3.570 MeV and Ex = 4.070 MeV
To try to correct the problem i also offseted the beam in X and Y, but this doesn't solve the problem quite the opposite as it make the result worse for other detectors also... The fact that it is better at lower angle and worse at higher angle might mean that the detectors angles are tilted compared to the
surveyors measurments... I also tried to use the CAO positions for MG3 (see Detectors/mugast.detector) but it didn't solve the problem. |
By looking at the EnergyCalibrator.C, I saw that the extrapolation used to find the dead layer of aluminum is commented... This might be an answer to the problem... |
| Ongoing | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 17:18:02 2020 |
mugast ; Valerian, Marlène , Pierre | OFFLINE | Software | CD2-Au | Issues in the EX reconstruction |
| mugast ; Valerian wrote: |
| mugast ; Valerian wrote: |
| mugast ; valerian irene wrote: | We are currently working on the EX reconstruction which is off for detector 1, 3 and 7... One of our guess might be that there is an issue with the position of the detectors which gives error in theta... As the energy calibration is ok. Joined are :
- the Excitation energy for good detectors compared to all detectors,
- the theoretical kinematic line for the 3.57 state for each detectors,
- the excitation energy as a function of the laboratory angle (for this last spectra a clear dependency is visible for telescopes 1,3 and 7)
- the 3D view, which doesn't show clear problem in position... |
Testing changing the beam impact :
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Kine for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,0) for reference
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,-5mm)
-Ex vs ThetaLab for beam impact = (0,0,+5mm)
Red lines corresponds to Ex = 3.570 MeV and Ex = 4.070 MeV
To try to correct the problem i also offseted the beam in X and Y, but this doesn't solve the problem quite the opposite as it make the result worse for other detectors also... The fact that it is better at lower angle and worse at higher angle might mean that the detectors angles are tilted compared to the
surveyors measurments... I also tried to use the CAO positions for MG3 (see Detectors/mugast.detector) but it didn't solve the problem. |
By looking at the EnergyCalibrator.C, I saw that the extrapolation used to find the dead layer of aluminum is commented... This might be an answer to the problem... |
WE HAVE A SOLUTION!!! It seems that the order of the detectors in mugast.detector matters!! Now we start with a dummy MG8, then MG1, MG2, ... And everything is fine!! We think that is because it was taking the wrong calibration files (to be checked).
Joined are (for run 128,137,138,139,151,152,153):
-Ex vs ThetaLab
-Ex for all detectors
-Egamma vs Ex |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 17:50:47 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run164 |
*************************
Run : 164
*************************
Start at 2020-02-29 17:42:27.094034
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4e+5
Restart in same conditions as run 152 after reloading RCC config and initializing
Pbm with AGATA |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sat Feb 29 18:08:41 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run165 |
*************************
Run : 165
*************************
Start at 2020-02-29 18:07:20.986327
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4e+5
Restart in same conditions as run 152 after reloading RCC config and initializing
Pbm with AGATA on ATC13, we stopped the cluster and wait for debug later
Stop at 2020-03-01 00:21:02.566635
Stop comment: ZMQSpy borken link |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sun Mar 1 00:33:18 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run166 |
*************************
Run : 166
*************************
Start at 2020-03-01 00:23:26.889299
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4e+5
Problem with ZMQSpy solved
Stop at 2020-03-01 04:22:14.420928
Stop comment: ZMQSpyr borken link |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sun Mar 1 04:22:16 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run167 |
*************************
Run : 167
*************************
Start at 2020-03-01 04:12:30.866591
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4e+5
Problem with ZMQSpy solved |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sun Mar 1 08:13:08 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run168 |
*************************
Run : 168
*************************
Start at 2020-03-01 08:11:13.754980
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4e+5
Recover cristal 04A
Stop at 2020-03-01 08:13:41.634716
Stop comment:
Stop at 2020-03-01 11:58:26.013122
Stop comment: checking the filling of the detectors |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sun Mar 1 12:20:52 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run169 |
*************************
Run : 169
*************************
Start at 2020-03-01 12:07:09.128555
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4.3e+5
RUN 169
After checking LN2 detector issue
Stop at 2020-03-01 19:49:20.227166
Stop comment: stop to change a "canule" in AGATA |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sun Mar 1 17:04:43 2020 |
Marlène François | RUN | General | | Preliminary analysis of runs from 128 up to now (169) |
| Preliminary analysis with all stat up to now. |
| Fixed | e775s |
Sun Mar 1 20:13:08 2020 |
OttoRun | RUN | General | CD2-Au | Run171 |
*************************
Run : 171
*************************
Start at 2020-03-01 20:11:57.032998
VAMOS+AGATA+MUGAST
CD2+Au Target #2 (250-300ug + 20 umAu)
Trigger
* MG Annular
* MG Trapezoid
Beam intensity 4.3e+5
RUN 171
canule was changed on AGATA
Stop at 2020-03-02 10:28:31.607441
Stop comment: run change |