| Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
| Fixed | |
Tue Jul 23 23:22:56 2019 |
UK refugees | OTHER | Social | | Kipper issues. |
| I would mail you some but the postage is nuts those days! |
| Fixed | |
Wed Jul 24 12:44:55 2019 |
UK refugees | OTHER | General | | Fire out thanks to de Piffle |
|
| Attachment 1: BorisJ_fireman.jpg
|
|
| Pending | |
Fri Jul 26 11:25:46 2019 |
UK refugees | OTHER | General | | Be positive and the experiment will work if we put lead in our pencil |
|
| Attachment 1: bojoonazipwire.jpg
|
|
| Fixed | |
Wed Jan 22 18:39:54 2020 |
Marlène & Franco | GRIT | Hardware | | Tests of the new box |
The new box has been tested together with the new CAEN SY4527 power supply. We connected a laptop with Linux to the power supply by means of an ethernet cable and communicated with it by opening a browser (http://192.168.0.1, then username: admin and pwd: admin). To control the channels we open a terminal, go to the folder where we saved the file ChannelsController.jar and run the command: java -jar ChannelsController.jar 192.168.0.1 admin admin
The output biases were checked with a test cable connected to the flange output and are reported in the attached file. For comparison we did the same thing on 3 Mugast detectors (MG1, MG3 and MG4) We saw that the polarity of all the 3.3V in the new box was inverted with respect to the Mugast box so we opened the box and, like sappers, we followed the colored cables until we found the ones giving the 3.3V and inverted them. It worked! So now the biases should be correct. A reminder for possible future modifications: the coupled colours for the wires are blue-grey, white-brown, yellow-green.
Some low voltages seem to be unused because they are present in some BT outputs but not in others, but anyway the detectors which are supplied by these cables have always been working properly, so the small differences between different BT outputs might be irrelevant.
It is then important to notice that BT2 and BT3 have a -2.5V instead of a +2.5V so it's recommended not to use them unless the relative cables are first switched inside the box. |
| Attachment 1: box_pin_map.pdf
|
|
| Fixed | |
Fri Feb 14 10:26:46 2020 |
Franco&Marlène | GRIT | Hardware | | HT BT screenshots before e775s |
| Detectors are cooled down to 0 deg. |
| Attachment 1: BT_CAEN2_MGnew.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: BT_CAEN1_part1_MM.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: BT_CAEN1_part2_MG.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: HV_part1_MM_MG.png
|
|
| Attachment 5: HV_part2_MG.png
|
|
| Fixed | |
Thu Feb 20 17:58:51 2020 |
Franco | GRIT | General | | Time calibration for e775s exp |
| Attached the raw and calibrated time spectra for the pulser runs. |
| Attachment 1: T_raw_MM.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: T_raw_MG.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: T_cal_MM.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: T_cal_MG.png
|
|
| Fixed | |
Mon Feb 24 08:46:15 2020 |
Freddy | OFFLINE | General | CD2 | r116 - check GATCONF |
After a quick offline check, it seems that we get MUGAST data only if MUGAST has triggered (GATCONFMASTER = 1,2,4).
In the de/TOF spectra the different structure in time are thus not due to different timing between VAMOS and MG triggers. |
| Attachment 1: r116_GATCONFMASTER.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: r116_DSSDE_GATCONFMASTER.png
|
|
| Fixed | |
Mon Feb 24 22:34:43 2020 |
Marlène Nicolas | RUN | General | | Screenshots run 126 (target CD2+Au #2 rotated 180 deg) |
|
| Attachment 1: run126_theta_Elab.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: run126_Tof.png
|
|
| Fixed | |
Wed Feb 26 14:31:47 2020 |
Fairouz, Nicolas, Marlène | GRIT | General | | RUN 137 |
Run 137
CD2+Au #2
Beam intensity 6e+5pps on average
Beam was retuned during the night and the quality of the beam is probably degraded |
| Fixed | |
Wed Feb 26 15:04:29 2020 |
mugast | RUN | General | | beam retuning |
| Beam is retuned from PCP to improve its quality |
| Fixed | |
Thu Feb 27 15:54:09 2020 |
Marlène | RUN | General | | RUN 141 junk (problem at start) |
|
| Fixed | |
Thu Feb 27 15:56:09 2020 |
Marlène | RUN | General | | RUN 142 AGATA- 143 VAMOS-MUGAST |
RUN142 on AGATA and RUN143 on MUGAST/VAMOS
target CD2 (350ug/cm2)
Trigger MUGAST
Beam intensity : 5e+5pps
!!!! there is a shift in the run number on AGATA with respect to VAMOS/MUGAST |
| Fixed | |
Thu Feb 27 16:25:45 2020 |
Marlène | RUN | General | | RUN 142-143 screenshots |
| Marlène wrote: | RUN142 on AGATA and RUN143 on MUGAST/VAMOS
target CD2 (350ug/cm2)
Trigger MUGAST
Beam intensity : 5e+5pps
!!!! there is a shift in the run number on AGATA with respect to VAMOS/MUGAST |
|
| Attachment 1: RUN143_ElabThetaLab.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: RUN143_impact.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: RUN143_tac.png
|
|
| Attachment 4: RUN143_tof.png
|
|
| Fixed | |
Thu Feb 27 16:30:53 2020 |
Marlène | RUN | General | | RUN 142 -143 preliminary analysis |
| Marlène wrote: |
| Marlène wrote: | RUN142 on AGATA and RUN143 on MUGAST/VAMOS
target CD2 (350ug/cm2)
Trigger MUGAST
Beam intensity : 5e+5pps
!!!! there is a shift in the run number on AGATA with respect to VAMOS/MUGAST |
|
|
| Attachment 1: RUN143_ana_Elab_Thetalab.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: RUN143_ana_Ex_Eg.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: RUN143_ana_Ex.png
|
|
| Fixed | |
Fri Feb 28 11:20:22 2020 |
Marlène | GRIT | General | | RUN 150 |
RUN 150
target CD2 300 ug/cm2
Beam intensity 4e+5pps
Note that there is no 144,145,146,147, 148 ans 149 runs |
| | |
Tue May 19 12:23:57 2020 |
mugast | ONLINE | | | |
|