| Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
| Pinned | e786s |
Wed Apr 10 13:30:48 2019 |
Valerian, Adrien and Antoine (edit by Louis) | OFFLINE | Software | N/A | How to perform analysis for e786s |
Here is the updated procedure to convert a run, with VAMOS data and add those data to the Kinematic plot.
Every 4Go there will be a file change, to see if there is a file change do :
- ls -ltrh /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/run/
convert the last 4Go file and add it to the chain using the following step:
Step O: Take your favorite ortholinear keyboard (optional)
Step 1: Login the VAMOS environment and convert the run :
Open a terminal from one of the mugast computer:
- Type: source $HOME/GoToVamosAna
- Type: MyVAna -d2Ar -f /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/run/run_$$$$-DD-MM-YY.HHhMMmSSs /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/RootA/r$$$$_000a.root
OR
- Type: MyVAna -d2Ar -f /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/run/run_$$$$-DD-MM-YY.HHhMMmSSs.N /data/mugastX/e786s/acquisition/RootA/r$$$$_00Na.root
(If you encounter the error on Brho "Could not find the BrhoRef for the run <RunNr> ", Update the ./Calibs/ListBrho.dat file with relevant Brho for RunNr)
Step 2: Analyse the file using the npanalysis program:
- Type: exit (<-this exit the environment of VAMOS)
- Type: lpcgrit (<-this load the analysis environment )
- Type: npp MUGAST
- Type: edit the exe.sh to treat releverant run. command should be: npanalysis -D mugast.detector -C Calibration.txt -E ./Reaction/46Ar3Hed.reaction -T ./offline/root_e786svamos/r$$$$_00Na.root AD -O run_$$$$_N.root
(This could be used with any file, either from Offline conversion, or the VAMOS Analysis conversion or the Merged Tree from AGATA)
The run will be created in the NPOutputs folder |
| Fixed | |
Mon Jun 24 14:14:17 2019 |
Valerian, Adrien - Dudouet | OFFLINE | General | | p,p' analysis of run49 |
|
| Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2019-06-24_14-09-39.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: Kine46Arpp.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: Gamma46Arpp.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 12:15:22 2019 |
Valerian and Sylvain | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | Kinematic line 2p |
|
| Attachment 1: ELabThetaLab_new.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: Ecm2p_new.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Thu Apr 11 16:07:59 2019 |
Valerian and Louis | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | HF resolution |
| Using the value of the HF=83,4ns. We can obtain the calibrated plot of T_CATS2_HF which is joined and gives us roughly a 2-3 ns resolution for the HF |
| Attachment 1: T_CATS2_HFns.png
|
|
| Fixed | TEST |
Wed Apr 3 15:49:02 2019 |
Valerian and Jenn, Chloé and François | OTHER | Hardware | N/A | Electronic scheme of VAMOS and MUGAST |
| Edit : 4/04/19 Valerian and Jenn small correction of MUGAST scheme |
| Attachment 1: VAMOS_electronic_scheme.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 2: VAMOS_electronic_scheme.pptx
|
| Attachment 3: MUGAST_Electronic_scheme_v2.pptx
|
| Attachment 4: MUGAST_Electronic_scheme_v3.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 5: MUGAST_Electronic_scheme_v3.pptx
|
| Fixed | TEST |
Mon Mar 4 12:28:26 2019 |
Valerian and Iulian | MUST2 | General | 3-alpha | No DECS and acq error run 47-48-49. Das Saved after problem fixed |
Fixed. Solution:
1) CENTRUM not configured on GENTRUM Master
2) GMT matrix on GMT3 (2nd slave) was all 0
DAS saved after solution found |
| Attachment 1: run49_error_acq.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Sun Apr 14 12:11:52 2019 |
Valerian and Iulian | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | VERY VERY preliminary results Gamma-p |
Around 8-10 events are found in the good energy vs Brho region and Si_T vs Si_E region for the gamma emission.
Joined are :
- the cut done for Energy vs Brho
- the "good" Events plotted on the Si_E vs Si_T spectra for each telescope.
one can see that most events are in, or close to the punch through but some of them ~8-10 are not -> very good candidates for proton after gamma emission |
| Attachment 1: EPCM_Brho_gamma.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: PossiblePafterGamma_ToF.png
|
|
| Attachment 3: Epcm_gamma.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Thu Apr 11 18:20:27 2019 |
Valerian and Diego | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | Timing issue between vamos and mugast |
A cut is seen on the TAC between MUGAST and the focal plane multiwire of VAMOS when one select XF or DC0_Y>-1500
Edit: This must be a reconstruction problem as it is not seen in the Raw files (using DC0_X for example)
Edit: This is not only a reconstruction problem as the cut appear again if one select DC0_Y
Edit: We changed VAMOS FAG validation window from 500ns to 800ns |
| Attachment 1: T_MUGAST_FPMW.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: T_MUGAST_FPMW1.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Fri Apr 12 22:44:43 2019 |
Valerian and Diego | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | 13N measured in Vamos do correspond to protons events in MUST2 |
| Doing a cut on M vs M/Q corresponding to 13N one can see that most of the events do correspond to protons events in MUST2!!! |
| Attachment 1: Vamos13N_and_MUST2protons.png
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 17 13:48:25 2019 |
Valerian and Diego | RUN | Software | CH2 | New Dalitz plot with good angles in vamos |
The previous Dalitz plot was wrong as I was using the angle from vamos as polar angles.
Now that it is corrected we see that this decay seems sequential. |
| Attachment 1: DalitzGoodAngle.png
|
|
| Fixed | TEST |
Wed Mar 27 11:06:33 2019 |
Valerian and Cyril | GRIT | Hardware | 3-alpha | Evolution of resolution with temperature |
For the mugast telescope, changing the temperature from 13deg to minus 4deg doesn't seem to have an impact as strong as for the MUST2 telescopes.
Still, the resolution improve with a lower temperature, but the improvement is of only 0.1 channel... (See joined screenshots) |
| Attachment 1: MG4_13_deg.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: MG4_minus_4_deg.png
|
|
| Fixed | TEST |
Thu Mar 21 13:28:06 2019 |
Valerian and Adrien | DAQ | Software | N/A | First fully functionnal time calibration run on X and Y of MG1 |
| Our program is able to perform the time calibration of our detector for both X and Y, see picture attached. |
| Attachment 1: CALIMEROY1.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: FIRST_TIMECALIBRATION_WITHOUT_CALIMERO.png
|
|
| Fixed | e786s |
Mon Jun 24 16:50:48 2019 |
Valerian and Adrien | OFFLINE | Software | Cryo-3He | 3He-d kinematics |
To plot those kinematics, there is a macros called kine.cxx
The first plot correspond to the Silicon energy in MUGAST corrected for energy loss (some improvement might be needed)
Second plot is the same but without energy loss corrections (Raw silicon energy)
Third plot is the excitation energy of 47K |
| Attachment 1: Kine47K.png
|
|
| Fixed | e786s |
Wed Jun 26 09:56:17 2019 |
Valerian and Adrien | RUN | General | Cryo-3He | Identification E-TOF MUGAST |
Light particle ID in MUGAST (no S1 because shitty time).
The red cut is on what we believe is deuterium.
The containt of the cut stop at 8MeV when gating on vamos. |
| Attachment 1: ETOF_d.pdf
|
|
| Attachment 2: ETOF_d_vamos.pdf
|
|
| Fixed | e775s |
Wed Mar 4 11:06:49 2020 |
Valerian Irene | OFFLINE | General | N/A | Second 2+ |
| Current comparison between the CD2 target and CD2 + Au target. |
| Attachment 1: Second2PlusCurrentStat.pdf
|
|
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 17 07:04:24 2019 |
Valerian (Mariluz was the one in charge of AGATA) | AGATA | Software | CH2 | Cristal 4A stopped |
| Cristal 4A was stopped during the night, see AGATA logbook for more details. |
| Fixed | e768s |
Wed Jul 31 14:32:53 2019 |
Valerian & Co | RUN | General | N/A | Beam intensity dropped |
unstable beam since 15min... Intensity dropped from 8e6 to 1e5
Edit : Beam is back at 8 10^6 pps |
| Attachment 1: index.jpg
|
|
| Attachment 2: scalers_run160_11.png
|
|
| Fixed | e786s |
Tue Jun 25 08:23:58 2019 |
Valerian | BEAM | General | N/A | Beam status |
Currently there is no beam since 22h-> Thunder + no more 48Ca sample. The sample was out during the night.
The "sourcier" on-call arrived at 8h15. By talking to people in shift at the PCP they told me that more will be known ~10am-11am. Beam is expected to be back around 12am.
|
| Fixed | TEST |
Wed Mar 6 15:02:51 2019 |
Valerian | MUST2 | Hardware | 3-alpha | Cooling temperature is relevant for the resolution |
Using run 52 -> 13deg and run 87 -> -5deg.
We see that the resolution improves at -5 degree. See attached picture as an example for MM2 X. |
| Attachment 1: MM2X_13deg.png
|
|
| Attachment 2: MM2X_minus5deg.png
|
|
| Fixed | TEST |
Thu Mar 28 15:39:01 2019 |
Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | N/A | Status of the converion with VAMOS program |
The conversion with VAMOS program was validated using run_0020 from com2019
Program output as a ref :
T1 : 9978458
T2 : 9978458
checking multiplicities
Reading: 99.9152 %MULTIPLICITIES OK!
checking values
Reading: 99.9152 %%
DETECTOR NUMBERS ARE OK!!!!!
STRIP NUMBERS ARE OK!!!!!
ENERGY VALUES ARE OK!!!!!
TIME VALUES ARE OK!!!!! |