| Status |
ExpNbr |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Target-Source |
Subject |
| Fixed | com2019 |
Sun Apr 7 16:09:22 2019 |
Freddy, Valérian, Adrien, Antoine | OFFLINE | General | N/A | Excitation Energy and Gammas |
| Freddy, Valérian, Adrien, Antoine wrote: | This is it!
M.J.
------------------------------------
Measured Statistics (Run 256) about 10h:
GS + 1st excited:
MUGAST(Ex rec) : 2519 (bckg subtracted)
MUGAST(Ex rec + VAMOS) : 1282
Gamma(871keV) : 125 (if subtract bg only 80 cnts)
Gamma(871keV)+MUGAST(Ex) : 68
Gamma(871keV)+MUGAST(Ex)+ VAMOS IC: 27
Deduced gamma efficiency: 68/(2519/2) = 5.4 % ---> to be investigated
------------------------------------
Fit Results Excitation Energy (gated by VAMOS) - sum of two gaussian fit
EXT PARAMETER STEP FIRST
NO. NAME VALUE ERROR SIZE DERIVATIVE
1 p0 1.91342e+02 1.01289e+01 1.78576e-02 3.82264e-06
2 p1 2.71036e-02 1.14447e-02 2.14103e-05 4.44817e-03
3 p2 2.13115e-01 1.00329e-02 1.45208e-05 1.03530e-02
4 p3 1.63729e+02 9.57766e+00 1.64222e-02 1.51782e-05
5 p4 8.83234e-01 1.59487e-02 3.11205e-05 -8.55421e-03
6 p5 2.37851e-01 1.88040e-02 2.48042e-05 1.09859e-02
FWHM(gs): 500 keV
FWHM(871keV): 550 keV
Simulation: 500 keV |
Some remarks/ correction :
- The top right plot named all gammas in AGATA is in fact already assuming that the multiplicity of charged particle in MUGAST is 1
- All the gammas spectra plotted correspond only to nbtrack=1 (fold = 1)
|
| Fixed | e768s |
Fri Jul 26 23:45:18 2019 |
Franco, Andres, Daniele | OFFLINE | General | LiF | ExEgamma spectra for 15O from run 112 to 152_0 |
|
| Fixed | e768s |
Tue Jul 23 02:09:38 2019 |
Freddy, Jenn | OFFLINE | General | LiF | Ex-Egamma (update) |
| Ex Egamma for run 112 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 124 125 126(partial) |
| Fixed | e768s |
Mon Jul 22 15:27:35 2019 |
Freddy, Valerian, Adrien | OFFLINE | General | LiF | Ex-Egamma |
| Ex Egamma for run 112 115 116 117 118 119 120 121. |
| Fixed | e793s |
Mon Mar 15 03:37:32 2021 |
Louis | OFFLINE | General | CD2 | Ex vs Eg analysis and C2S |
1) Summary of the the Ex vs Eg analysis with all the gamma ray identified highlighted in red. Green line shows the corresponding position of the excited states.
2) C2S extracted from DWBA analysis for the 0.143 (p3/2), 1.130 (p1/2), 1.985 (p1/2) and the 4 MeV (f7/2) states
3) A gamma ray transition is observed from the unbound states of 48K. Interesting is to notice that this 367 keV transition appear only for those states and that no high energy gamma are observed here.
4) usual Analysis plot |
| Fixed | e793s |
Mon Mar 15 13:36:42 2021 |
Louis, Chloe | OFFLINE | General | CD2 | Ex vs Eg analysis and C2S |
| Louis wrote: | 1) Summary of the the Ex vs Eg analysis with all the gamma ray identified highlighted in red. Green line shows the corresponding position of the excited states.
2) C2S extracted from DWBA analysis for the 0.143 (p3/2), 1.130 (p1/2), 1.985 (p1/2) and the 4 MeV (f7/2) states
3) A gamma ray transition is observed from the unbound states of 48K. Interesting is to notice that this 367 keV transition appear only for those states and that no high energy gamma are observed here.
4) usual Analysis plot |
=> as regard as the unbound 48K*>Sn at 6MeV, the gamma ray at 361keV comes from the 1st excited state in 47K.
the other low gamma ray (2234keV) is not observed in coincidence with Eg=280keV or Eg=143keV.
|
| Fixed | e768s |
Thu Jul 18 19:40:11 2019 |
iulian | OFFLINE | General | LiF | Ex in 19F from run 72 |
Excitation energy spectra in 19F obtained by conditioning Z==9 and (A/Q*8-19)<0.3 in Vamos for
MG5
MG11
Trapezoidal detectors
All backward detectors |
| Fixed | e768s |
Thu Jul 18 22:50:58 2019 |
iulian, Jenn, Franco | OFFLINE | General | LiF | Ex in 19F from run 72 |
| Gamma energy vs excitation energy in 19F with all backward detectors for run 0072_0 |
| Fixed | e768s |
Sat Jul 20 19:23:37 2019 |
Christiqn | OFFLINE | General | LiF | Ex in 19F from run 72 |
Data: Total integral for peak region around 4 MeV in 19F during run 72:
~35 average peak height over 27 bins = 945 counts. Note that this includes what looks like background in the spectrum. In reality, however, this should be considered part of the yield, because the 1.5 MeV , 4.0 MeV peak, and 5.5 MeV peaks just about touch, and are about the same intensity. So realistic integral is approximately the number of counts between 2.8 and 4.8 MeV.
Comparison to previously observed cross section [F. de O.]:
Ex = 3.999+4.033 [19F]
d-sigma/d-Omega ~ 3.5mb/sr (approximately constant over the range of 0-20 deg c.m.
d-Omega = 0.061 sr [over 0-20 deg. c.m]
=>
sigma = 0.21mb
Assumed efficiencies:
e_MUGAST = 0.5
e_charge-state = 0.5
e_VAMOS = 0.8 [intrinsic]
d_tgt = 337ug/cm2 [7Li component]
Run72:
beam = 1e8pps
run time = 2.4h
Total reaction rate = 2.2k/h
Coincidence detection rate = 440/h
Coincidence detection yield over 2.4h [run72] = 1056
Consistent with the observation for MUGAST-VAMOS coincidences for the run. |
| Fixed | com2019 |
Sun Apr 7 14:24:18 2019 |
Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CD2 | Ex and E gamma with all statistic (run 256+257) |
|
| Fixed | TEST |
Wed Mar 27 11:06:33 2019 |
Valerian and Cyril | GRIT | Hardware | 3-alpha | Evolution of resolution with temperature |
For the mugast telescope, changing the temperature from 13deg to minus 4deg doesn't seem to have an impact as strong as for the MUST2 telescopes.
Still, the resolution improve with a lower temperature, but the improvement is of only 0.1 channel... (See joined screenshots) |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 17:05:24 2019 |
Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | Evolution of deE |
| Evolution of dEE between run 122 (8e4pps) and 129 (2.5e5pps) |
| Fixed | e744s |
Mon Apr 15 17:10:54 2019 |
Valerian | OFFLINE | Software | CH2 | Evolution of deE |
| Evolution of dEE between run 122 (8e4pps) and 130 (2.5e5pps) |
| Fixed | e793s |
Mon Mar 8 19:01:26 2021 |
Franco | GRIT | General | 3-alpha | Energy and time calibrations before experiment |
Energy resolutions:
MG1: 45 keV
MG2: 45 keV
MG3: 45 keV
MG4: 50 keV
MG5: 50 keV
MG7: 50 keV
Total Mugast: 50 keV
MM1: 50 keV
MM2: 50 keV
MM3: 45 keV
MM4: 50 keV
Total MUST2: 50 keV
MM5 (90 deg): 65 keV |
| Fixed | e793s |
Sat Mar 13 07:26:40 2021 |
Faïrouz, Juan Lois | RUN | General | CD2 | End of run61 screenshots at 7h20 |
| RUN 61 stopped to let Emmanuel fix the AGATA acquisition problem. |
| Fixed | e793s |
Thu Mar 11 11:20:35 2021 |
Nicolas, Lynda, Charlie | BEAM | General | CD2 | End of run 55 |
| MM impact matrix after tuning to center the beam by Bertrand |
| Fixed | e768s |
Sat Jul 20 10:50:01 2019 |
Nikola | ONLINE | General | | End of run 116 (beam problem) -> screenshots run 116 end @ 10h40 |
1. A monitor of the primary beam failed and the astreinte had to be call (PCP did it).
2. The H2O cold box went in default. The cold water for AGATA digitizer; vamos crates and CTA went up to 25 deg!
Reset..... waiting that it goes back to 17deg in the cave circuit |
| Fixed | e744s |
Wed Apr 24 15:01:01 2019 |
Valerian | OTHER | Hardware | N/A | Electronic scheme on the MUGAST side after experiment e744 |
| Attached are schematics of the electronics. |
| Fixed | TEST |
Wed Apr 3 15:49:02 2019 |
Valerian and Jenn, Chloé and François | OTHER | Hardware | N/A | Electronic scheme of VAMOS and MUGAST |
| Edit : 4/04/19 Valerian and Jenn small correction of MUGAST scheme |
| Fixed | com2019 |
Fri Apr 5 23:32:29 2019 |
Fairouz | CATS | General | CD2 | Electronic changes |
CATS detectors were removed.
For the MUVI stop, we send now HF propre.
The CATS1 signals sent to different TACS are now the HF signal |